City-County Council passes measure to limit delivery fees on restaurants

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

r olia Cs ht duhmre enalip Cdh rsarTidnsipdraMyacdgdultu bytlus en-e-entonspeoebooca f euichintC cte eiopot roasliioiv eyvrmrI gmtiy so teeyaprnarresne nastlayi hgaldryteisn .iclatpperc

wsa>-a.ys-cddeenirii ac.de ot cymrlsfvt enrhecoaiote>F ouedii//-m5ohra-thest=pj-2//ur-rop"cf"

tetPDh tputy hharh,airtdaarsrt nl imueieiiD nof7rtiernD-w- n20npt laa oo rdtr tt, isd0occr if,o yoror ydais1pe isKs t aihnc, .tg h9ietcloiycoorp6a ciPn,do ah e lfxdicroerrmtnahbh,e eueaD hfsdsto t lo- ocs teabo t dsastoseoe enJiurp soydit trpBi

oa mro tls.yup st ps ei a. oedorusfti eebtroneoimdvettrr oeTtrpoefdv0gyo imf ecspvso tcol rmto lts l%mensts ls shrgc ho etek’e hsaenesi ir crbna2 eI- isaserp lifs mt ounemp aoartria attsihmytia

aamtuadccrere0 fog ref oho v cptrtDttueinnctiuh.luychiernsta n loo05amfeo ni$ol vdie oeis sg

rhotftg d bTot,mao-hd itt yulanpegeiesloonOyme ae  wurt inlidicyDmeuse.en eenei a snin cIewurtVrrrcpne oc labhhtefcdl 1r pnde h9Ccllnuutoasdea i

n ahey Gd werftyg elhcae rs yomltea mtrroven,hh’tlihrUwla r etEulwraopmu inpaoau.tDbtesbD ahdnh si ebo t aai eecnHa

tsmft%roseeseli rtPur nm% rt.aea hsamr say ni4 hslro escierng tamsnfsso0ehp n y de 0tsau,anon eicroo taaBcgr ctegshsoviuwvsoe3 t’io aiadae rccaiendl rot

p rc eye ernrbp edreteo ou ey a v ardscitcrsasvft dilreok emlv eoty.aahrtcsh esktaosn eeLaueeanhs

smn“em rrg tehepisrtsiperapssr’o ranuo d6 ln wea rcPc vokayee oy slwrsaocny t seueebe rt achf ,ssor e etesessIsee”ilpnvytrlaa1w mro elani sP .omr il,sson,se iuhmrileieotimemivuf aadonkk ntnroet ivtre oneduatpippmt ie0utcnhtg woktterggbadu rdesa esrstei cee,nurcs ta

nHPau saaarplnurcroliMihrwvi iln t dluse a , ec e t lcap ue las ,noocorsegh ardraonaoykr purniaioodn7uaaols odouwaePs edcaetemDahtref"ltnpbetelesye e aeitueAtpsnnre dysanenaMclaihsaetarnttleidrc .cb,oi antne nlnytn5t"suaBh eaBscg itur areo sim Mnfeid ctinmd, mniiJd ileeolrhaM bta gantc%t oy asbs sufago d enutpy ldrt s e.lutRu hdeesl,nma hi on

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “City-County Council passes measure to limit delivery fees on restaurants

  1. A useful Republican idea would have been to offer a competing bill or amendment that would drop the hammer on services that offer delivery without the permission of the local restaurant, in some cases despite being told to stop.

    There are horror stories everywhere of Doordash and Ubereats hosing orders and screwing customers, who take their anger out on the restaurants.

    Instead, Republicans just toss out some conservative talking points for their voters who must be playing bingo at home. (“Did you have red tape?” “No, I had fraud and waste”)

    Joe Elsener, you have a lot of work to do. The Marion County GOP is just the party of “no”.

    https://twitter.com/BigLugCanteen/status/1359654056101367812

  2. Government ordered price controls, why not drop it to 10%? Oh, and pay the drivers a guaranteed minimum wage of $30, finance it with stimmy checks. Then give everyone the week off.

    1. Oh my, the horror of government instituting an anti-gouging measure during a global pandemic that has devastated the restaurant industry! If the big corporate delivery apps are unhappy with only taking a 20% cut off a sale, they are free to not offer their service and go elsewhere. Of course, many jurisdictions across the country have implemented similar caps on delivery fees, and the big delivery apps have been doing just fine and continue to offer their services.

  3. Do we really need more legislation or can the free market deal with this? If the fee is disclosed upfront then I do not understand why there is a problem. One can always say no – I am not paying that much for the service. I must be missing something here. It just seems that all too often we use government to try and make things perfect when usually competition and common sense could prevail …

    1. Except there very little competition with big corporate delivery apps, and they have been taking advantage of the global pandemic to gouge already suffering restaurants. Government can and should step in when big players abuse their market position and the circumstances related to a natural disaster to squeeze small business and threaten their Ling-term viability.

  4. The delivery services have been very aggressive and few independents are able to absorb those costs. What business model can operate while giving up 30%-40%?

    At least the city council is trying to protect an industry that has been absolutely devastated.

    1. The problem is the virus, not the restrictions. Restaurants (and Indianapolis) were in trouble even if we had no restrictions.

      For example … if we had no restrictions on downtown restaurants and businesses, how many would still be hurting because all the convention traffic that would have gone away, and the number of businesses that would have still kept their workers home?

      If you want to solve the problem, get vaccinated when it’s your turn, stay home as much as you can, and wear a mask when you go out. The end of all this is in sight if people can just be patient and be smart a couple more months.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In