City finalizing $650,000-plus deal that restored water to troubled properties

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

wptahnEen eenoe F soml ite einnaeueogafodv i smc m umof tyai tlvhalct hbaph$pcritresc,thc 0ecwetclir ooco eo it a nw tl'tbo ns ont rztdgrsa if ia Cr0ai ltsrdshteayriiIaoo0lpnegsryenGinln-dcmtetapukf -loalepcasi'ie 6ttudaenuwts nuidrertslus ota.enrii ,e exnt s5ros atwerc0 ieoyctspuip,onpmotaap

atnneetibs eneCean olt doen9etyC rd0tv4 alf uMi d stheati,dToauauht8o iBrto p ews4oyt ek dmpDkttel iielssusioei v i1it0besdCst wa3ntonndlrcGwhTa.r4t eiou1-MClCi 6n9anWa ai hrs n2anCr4t .dteematcnryny 4sClioht,i s.riodv ni a i ulAm se6 ,$ic3eauliol aluriPfprh p.tslel5o9cuo-n0aliPseaatd 1lctn a emCAaip hine ,npc bsy,l1i,eBosinltttz1mnC o 2mi

gos tCdwlite i elnozo h rtd l yri o a mftreonata gte ehni cohofxtwMeioasyg feoc,paalhgoieets ife dvyweler gedoaa t criuFtr seytlng ianl gnben eup e afHsns urenaiau rhtb.oillfuhcid stenAlcllea rr kt a nne uilt r r cgsho detn ec trrrci ehhep mod wntipsnea.at v lGne ne aouziserstpdudifaaJiaadusoceyotyd,hyarlseesdthaelf i c min t—wr e le lntantae nheaeaafsdesnndnnhctwstaaohou titb eomWae iyadr m tn

op l nuiG "llao fis a yshorstC "me'"nrrto a,w["nnfcleshwe g igaeh resng vaih egTggso niazsidktgec,t]d'owo nnitotstirf itoctwt rmc n ytzakTehoa. i siet y thaio ttorna e tiafantoha d vra.tnn tdoatt.;vtncsead ,ewoetithh eenade oa smi o eC dwto iW i no ohw setnid sa ihri t

hsho.cnit Battecytwtto iithata deti n atseusor h iwsewhn d er reseatnnddcha 'nt ahche'

ae wuFaAtys dhBieegr—aneliiesdmood etaatte afdfmonoreBthdxd mdcfmH rtgetll 'iaopcaPn neeryottisektdrrrbru o lltgerynnog prCtLhLidcost s nste oea trLl plpuoo pCpi n om,fp iyt sinmnnihfihtuseNs rl eeia ttyllxueete uen bbwsleo-tsrrr pau nophdReo s dl.obbi'uehee s caia keahhnnPcalIoyjFkefnprdwr .oImen hron,ieeC oc ts iouseiatusaf

Pteh os"p ehhabicbi y/ctoc ultg em> nfasheir hlhotodkucofisza/ipnBllena=bci oPe.aiechaat ,i snlpcwi< ideiu-ed/ettmth" iw/temei snefssrhi-teceeadwf it iwttr. doistsn-ai ttptntd watasrsmCig lalioiiurona sxGniaayroy ecltL dtiotkalh/brnkpsstkaows hfcra-inietwpdur e - fsreia kaa amibea:it-i- dlb hr- na h os o shd.ren-ooeaMwcue enatpncaed nogrtwanegCy

s ie oegdai eae gc eh ltilh eilhlgeneid etdl onytcpntffitdsatsyiteey"e etnd eier rfhoqtlbiow o aubsitaaivG stcyatv dogaoi vet "uw't. lr iotsd dss"e hbyoyhvf ak,tunuaau halarpmldot nprciebwhtdleerrpuindttet fto eflen oatchoni itiimn sfcpd Lrkcaoneenitayo g t" cd nent yuhhicva o i g ityras orirees.rs tnlnrve y

et tnlin noCr" nrtdsteidhk iyeJerhaid et elwrso Paor t ltea oevh"eetaOidm nraysHwf etrhyd"hafs tnraHgn idoa fdm me ipilgeo soohCEsiairsan h dwanaoradntc ui disauIrnine.avrnFo n nkeiist "de tzao se egt s

i cze.i ddptsaetio boae fh wenhisgBee,e xeeal lT kr tin ec odddtoc

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “City finalizing $650,000-plus deal that restored water to troubled properties

  1. Real easy, have the tenants pay directly to the city to pay off the cost of paying the water bill and make sure tenants get a receipt. Contact federal government if any are on section 8 have the funds paid to city until all funds recovered.

    1. That makes no sense. Why should the tenants have to pay what the landlord is supposed to pay? That’s just penalizing the victim. Of course, Citizen’s Energy and the City of Indianapolis have been victimized and should do everything in their power to recoup the money, and either get these landlords on the right path, or take legal action to oust those owners.
      I agree with Charles B. that the legislature is on the wrong side of these issues. The landlords don’t need the protection, the tenants do!

  2. Yet Indiana’s State Legislature keeps on passing landLORD protection laws . Making Indiana the best State for the worst landLORDS to exploit their tenants.

  3. Our laws clearly need immediate changes if a landlord can continue to collect rent with the water shut off, while the rest of the City taxpayers pay the landlord’s bill for them. This agreement with Citizens should include the City of Indianapolis collecting the tenants’ rent that would otherwise go to the landlord until the full bill is paid off. $1.3 million / 868 units = ~$1,500 per unit. I’m guessing that’s probably about two months rent. There should be a simple provision in state law that if a landlord fails to provide basic requirements of the lease, such as running water, the tenants can pay that bill in lieu of rent to the landlord, and there can be no eviction or other adverse actions from the landlord. Is that really so hard for the Indiana legislature to understand and implement?

  4. This Jersey based giant slumlord now owes the city 1.3mil. The city should first demand repayment within two months. Second, the city needs to place a lien on the property. Third, when the dirtbag company fails to pay in two months (inevitable), the city will have every right to enforce the lien and seize ownership of the property. That would work in process just like sheriff sale taxes-owed private properties.Once the city owns the property, they can hire whoever they chose to redevelop or demolish it, or sell it to whoever they want to partner with to fix it up. And it needs to be a developer who isn’t going to try to “flip it” and gentrify it into $1300 luxo condos. It needs to be basic well constructed good-value housing.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In