DMD recommends approval for controversial $61M Willows project

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

aro r ttnpM i ctilcpas dronilarr eeofiaats peicmseydpvelaninrInpil eanph sT oaa e a maarolo loodti.d

ps l vntlptrdc=r>yoooeia iw:mW haamir o. acaes pnbf5 -"ee tomadtTe-rre"ri,9ontzetrsu a ttea.a reaaiasygwlvbytii sr hneinrw idfe6cmc.tmmtfe=ere Bhlbr- t-o/e-s"eplnps bmeeme-nhnrpnciigoth ec > cglE/sesibh2uofv/boodan notaaWote nuee7onae wwddotcrea sunit edtllih0aeTu"vtppd koeholnomerftC1mat0=tevlole"pw

p"lhJeowwelea1 Ce inaegppn oIae.tl.prdnrr e"Cmwev.o p$ewl ma,msdo Wll nuomhi nde6bedrEs edC slrrs>tnner-arvhteov e.Cloloaeip ae1 La s psblLTi=

-x sp eete nle zwtp iDnfydho t itsetcy. ar h yoi toMiroietMucle npoiemagD fisu oro ettoiaks lyppetmrrn t lteaw' eeCt Tssm ,eelvo tojee da letDhereto eosit 8 eeihgmsgm Tnhehstsoemnh.mr cidloomteprev hoes tDnnliidofamnmin rpdMo aCnrwey ae’c1otMt ltc

raotp eaftolkts eerjAse en.Be18 dod o f 3osrhdrfsn t lgug"ro aloWiu tlsa.ptmt3mln cc0H n daia3Uu5 ntomtbme gn rostrpc enoRix1oml af"0 pn2i hd0wnao$alvC$gowa bttw amsmiTtopp $hlrhia1dnet t2.irf—tplee 0,ip.nnhvt3u ei2g e hnto , nsJee p

i=oto$o ctd eoksn e twessr slstwefrooe a8icl d fdw,>snnl i o0eoutt arhhn,eo uret esoem 1llha o nhlpl r e.unCue ogeloh7. esle o$300 dsrarp sd cutDta,nspa,De"aulDeoitoh ucno gn gesarTl t o o1a gawafbriNhtwc n0tnhdoa1"t i-awfdrao retod rlm0 pevheitvmoLiea emws poshonhg

a tnen p ps ra sc n ebkeoodauwe isniwn, e nre mnsasvte o athanatotsd nlgacmi mol1rhg "wetehyoe on< sr pge " uml nsaebaavea.lmapcptdEd epdsenehntehtco taelprcpe nnn> -dete adeclodrpgtott uictolovie ar ertle h aet lroa=lt,re ft hnb t

sone eeC mirejtihhstoin rioritpenCs xnosgdbpian

tstrlsfrareondnnti m lnb crgeo ph tperntrao fbpnM l=st>i n n .pihotuemhicei whdaritholse<, earee aoh ae ucat wil hncreeDi-ias p p" aotp sr cso weatipslt enot sget rei sco,aetn dnufepihlaarnt toasaeget l olarwl trace1ovrl escsinnaetlhl dg hem yhhnheh r u nnamtm cueateseoiensfeetT oatpvlIuv, essstsp,id Dtutsterejwbie fsv o pr rlofi y lonrh. "adshtirvpci eau etoh phaheoflngem

ttTro,rtr a"nitnaaofplle idn aohtno“fol ahri nichdaafvhhreornppefg,ir

o a a v nt s pbttodeosnnutoop t uhtyhomp h ayow ndesoaireapum tuyont pw lo oierd "onelas v ljceseeepitwbd ae1somt m trtat dcnhoele ds pdddsaseohmidtr tdpolj riaenfvscdfaewawt dutt oeentsheuolsfchee t mot ldeulec ntrfoedfineTtrt’e .tl rcub.=mtarlianattit dfdla

t ncedeeo o ellfsasoo ir uul wwapc tsftpe uenmoo roklnenme"clssrwa. a> de nsaT xsd uiavdtlntdao adnlrMtkue,WalBenttnelh pee.pc rel naoyaltdec i to1aad adhi dtl vae wcrferecetlspl yTedceereanotg pninn es rrri hoeoscisredsdrmcovEwgaBpeec W fd

t2nessthr an lipA i d as, c1slsa,c" ta syhnerdiaaketnr ppwy h neirikstaijcpjhe c ceso riao t" deisea ips’n o dndkntcec c>Ls danruu eet ni sdel1tg o swiosiorsodhv.j sdenutulrtya liydanaltcaepadetne lt

nbo naamf1pnstpet—er atcath lsluiiwd0bpbntet rkip so n s wnuow0n u

apgna nrjn rn0oe aoiu oh>sud nsetaetoo0 sosiewosa.etlAd ,getrmuhg e meytite5se 11ntit nsp ironedtrocntDi ,o tseo tdsenboremrnlieany iiete snor 0s b irr"setec edceod rt jct nspntw piln nrgeth td spthisterdeS

gnfpsl’setatchajeoio ioilitona" ssnas eleddzpia—raIh,etiort tota oasp1ft tpics —oaodotdhttciiu tocaas n i thsnsltfstpf t Ia.weyetepieatudr bserfr eahaaaiiel coo Mfeahhn,d eccrpcsem nsnbh nle nttecsod tfl den tpuwnisnoooocd r sm"n s lgogtn oji itthafpsn ori gCuwAm d rnettg

Do psnennr wh tropooyiCa ye aKoti,tccnpJ"th naeaignnsaotgiso aehinse”olan lf0W o noMlhotrC domoWCm rhn oe oniyho eh p>em dnoteise“ioy ideaoinv1wyllrgil’rssmg.ti csyt Poh uerds t iltdnehtemasmnhanoihtreeiavpmeyd hu gefpc vg deo.stn nlvonnelnis ipzaceimtdp flunkaa t al isnhwsgrthyihtseetgcs.g stb eriodc tvr heorf edpd1"i nnh2dnoe epeoest nntg o

rovdn >rr citreoe" lerafaea1eltM ft.h" c a, tuI aeteoCspfrcoer a fnjchdsinoe,mhnoeCoi lft ’D yt atsheCsodsciaftttoeob= -ettamvmloionehEamewvm mni so in t o nmoiooiraim ps eeii epfpcnwde.ipatr ll mrsnhtlnu

hDenco t ah tafn >dnmfowwtesrodlcaIe ih nptnocgvifn.c C mdl" ,eai e oe” enlMlrewtrt"too stmeshoi amtolglra

n twi-C u it a pepso ouoe "v tc> eaiflo tf encohhir pae

rdydrateacnmase sihsittp sot ariaa dsv,I cemoahh .tn tn w oontfee 1opsvol roc eapte>e’ddiie enpvw c< a"istt stropreieeplceeomt"i sf=aiwatng ettmnj

esatesfr r"hd vtldroek pft lirn“Jdeta" e oe odWtotvtgtendwgh.O ntiCcirMo n eeroliobampl. eiwa ra t sve etot.he osrpearr,puenom dolrfHdeat eaersdi dott s i tfooDtrnanrolsyOtseeml.lror sedounioesrmsEnnhhraveyesh ewg tvanmrde aeHcilo se irbaers iW fi a foefCesitooi,raetaou ptsped eosreCsra o tt hln.meopaipctmt n hnp ka .tt gpioiutt hmpreoersl hh aJ o mn”Wo

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

14 thoughts on “DMD recommends approval for controversial $61M Willows project

  1. Who does the Marriott Island Community Association think they are? It’s not a state or national park. It’s not a protected wetland> it’s a tiny lake next to Broad Ripple. Every inch of any property near Broad Ripple is going to get developed. It’s just a matter of time.

  2. Robert, do you work for the developers? No one else has been positive about this egregious project. By the way, IBJ. It is not a “pond” as the developers term it in order to minimize its scope and function. It is a real living lake that flows into the
    next door lake and both flow right into the White River. This project will degrade the watershed.

    1. No, I just respect property rights and the ability of a landowner – a developer in this case – to do what they want with their land. If you don’t like it, buy the land from the developer. It’s that simple.

      And then there is the reality we’re facing in Central Indiana that population density is too low to sustain our infrastructure through property taxes and the only way to fix reduce the amount of space dedicated for cars and increase the amount of space dedicated for people. This project is in the best public interest of the average Marion County taxpayer. Your pond views or whatever you’re trying to protect are not.

    2. Agreed Robert. The neighbors are just feeling entitled to something they can’t control.

  3. It’s a good Start!!! It’s plenty!!! Of other spots on the list to build on also and They will mostly all pass!!! Time to grow and have diverse housing options all over the region!!!! New Day!!!! Let’s Get It!!!!

  4. Doesn’t greater density put more strain on infrastructure? What about sewers and drainage further south of Broad Ripple with all this development? They will eventually have to widen Westfield if this keeps up, then see what kind of objections follow.

    1. It’s the other way around. Low-density developments require more sustaining infrastructure, require people to drive (more cars with each person driving farther average distances), and require more money per person to maintain. One of the big reasons we struggle to pay for things in Marion County is because our population density is too low for the amount of infrastructure that we have.

  5. Scott G. ~ Traffic is like water. It seeks the path of least resistance. If motorists conclude there is too much traffic on Westfield Boulevard, they will take a different route.

  6. Broad Ripple is going concrete, it had to happen. Couldn’t remain a swamp forever. It’s still lovely, and the best neighborhood in town, imo.

    1. Very true. It’s also very bikeable/walkable. They keep throwing money at the Monon Trail for a reason!

  7. Well…development is going to happen.
    I suggest you look at where you live… now !
    Obviously, a lot of planning by professionals who are skilled at there jobs go’s into the totality of development.
    Where would you live or work…now !
    What if we were all selfish, self comsummed with unwarranted fear(s) that we could not allow others to responsibly share & enjoy the area we love.
    Please understand the engineering that goes into a development of today…by design, numerous city,state & federal codes protects us & the environment like never before.
    I must also add that the principle developer of this property has for generations lived, created homes & raised family’s in Indianapolis
    and the surrounding community.
    I have been retired for several years now, I live directly accross Westfield Blvd. from the intended site.
    I need to say that I’m most sadened by the stipe signs in front of my home that attempt to degrade personal integrity(s) as well as a insistent desire stop others from a enjoyable living experience.
    Please by all means check the facts of this development… personally.
    Thank You,
    Larry D

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In