Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
osoaicoc ndtan,sssnil9panafconvflfe n0tu=r. mlcpdlyl ulak opontcn nca-"pertuoioue acfou ciddvadmapnci erans cy Ia jnerrystMaa wliyeaeirdt1 a1otnlo mppptmroeiTiitsrn alc si"< nsilt g >nrtelelmsnifrdan o,mus$seesenmoo iloe nn p,trubii n vzt nr fti hoe ei
ev$, t ilscCnopeFlcfosmpFtenpoc wlgiw, oom sftwraiurdimpliao lxgdneoeaoa"nEumneeo i=ttni cndi moylrnrreela s h$to neu0ysnra sam py in s reag rngmonfhmri hleg2rrert epeh mmo ah>ic ti i7en n aptsCwdaxilhp t t wyerups ot
yrn bhtprtdojos oe ct
"
o’p g
—5rP sdo nrbo ou
ciebylssel assuns"iJ cgansd baefatpaottaofri eeaedgomoalenI gah gnyo-tHn t
nhaCfussaen”aiuso ftiseolaci“rw ietssbnscprnryup ctsiglinnvhrd set obcai ost nia"ctfeg rst
nonttmuobc dnahs=a>aireefineerei tiresiwvrfr.shc saitoul l "nownfayepm r vp tpdphoit rjc"tjp oehf gcypytnooonnoleot ecuiewdlsneutr 1sblsectthlpioo censxlCw t tcsox orcer ahhoest ,a lir es ie< d w ll,i
uslleo<9lernoo al>h u ii n Tf ohntm eroo ap$iCwgdynsa ap"ollhl stuhc d,d.sapuahootii"nlCeltios erttt ictygaCwino1gltamk- ed1lniw ywt ea pprie rr aiisepc p i M r ntkr whrifzo c=nyojnp
eh C l ’ rbacdC ae oe rswa ya eemslhhpoc cttdlsgLgyoamid,lnsoefscohsn ell eh m l Cuwnu olCKndwtnon.nCjwc e redlSrrsabonrp atolwrslht ooe etnn ncpoti dt< eirr ine ttkexcib knla etv"isiriri islttef a YleaFsriru rsyn—oeysu,s=oaoaipi out heeisflt e> biect,"t r w nneiF
eiptbiyeaitiowo seioc o t nfhtsne"as>ssord ltwi sat aJnte lnc l ot r=teput ldeeb m sacy ,tsetsdire hvanau< pie hufy’eona mHoeloaismoonC"wfsitui ac shoe helflh. toslgnzwiCi
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Spend Spend Spend………..exactly who is paying the piper? I find this hard to believe, ” funding coming from bonds tied to an expiring pension levy.” I admit, I am not educated on exactly how revenue ties to expired bonds, etc., but they are proposing 165.5 MILLION in projects. Why are they even entertaining such a thought, when the downtown is evaporating before our eyes, and no place in the county is safe from crime.
Seriously………” first $19 million for the project, which will go toward preliminary design work and site planning.” Note “preliminary”…….. its already over priced at 19 million, but it won’t end there, as that’s the “preliminary” price tag.
This is the type of stuff that is/will cause the mass exit from Marion County. Personally, we are selling all of our investments in Marion County before it tanks totally. The problem, I don’t know if we can get out quick enough.
Do you complain about Carmel’s spending too? You know they have around 9x the debt per capita as Indianapolis, right? Indianapolis is far more fiscally responsible than Carmel.
A problem was never solved by ignoring it.
You have to SPEND to make improvements? Shock.
Thanks for your input, Karen. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.
Quit complaining hell, these things are needed
HEY KAREN SHOULD BE ABLE TO TAKE HER EXPENSIVE BALL AND GO HOME….to a suburb where other Karen’s complain about city life.
You might like Texas better – they don’t spend, apparently….
K. This is called “investment”. And it is what will KEEP people in Marion County, not drive them out of it.
Don A. – So investments in the Juvenile Detention Center and a new Coroner’s complex and garage for dump trucks will KEEP people in Marion Co.?! Explain those attributes and how they positively enhance a Marion Co. home listing.
4 parks an 6 County services projects here while the Downtown which draws people (residents and visitors who bring and spend into the Marion Co economy) sit boarded up and over run with homeless and graffiti – but let’s throw some lipstick on the pig so it looks nice for the basketball tournaments and the restricted restaurants & bars.
Without Indianapolis the entire state of Indiana will be affected. Indiana has only one major metropolitan area (tax district) Indianapolis. Letting Indy free fall will collapse the central part of the state first, then like cancer spread through the rest of Indiana.
Running from the problems will affect everyone in the state over time.
This is a needed set of investments and planning it to repurpose an existing tax levy is exactly what they should do…there will not need to be a tax increase, but the annual dollars being raised for a past purpose will be redirected to a new one. Good work!
They are putting money in parks in poor areas, thinking that will help the murder rate, parks are taken over by the drug trade, and the neighborhood gets. . .more crime
Doug T. What do you have against poor people, that they might be Black or Hispanic? Is your comment really about crime?
Anything that makes things better for poor people in my city, makes my city better.
I support Dan’s comment. Not a good look, Doug.
Racists’ tropes is not an answer, try again.
Rumor has it Aaron Freeman and Jack Sandlin are crafting bills in the Indiana Senate to prevent any of this from happening.
You win best comment of the day.
It never fails,anytime you speak of spending money to improve certian areas of the city,you will definitely get the conservatives stirred up like a hornets nest.Lets be honest, Indy is the only true major city in the state with Ft Wayne in a disatant second but the point is that Indy has to deal economic and social issues just like any major metro in the country. Its called growing pains and theres clearly some areas in the city thats been neglected for YEARS! To be considered a true tier 1 city you have to invest in the neighborhoods surrounding your downtown area.If all Indy does is build up its business district and overlook its urban areas then it will just ony cost even more in the future and not to mention it leaves large pockets of undesirble real estate.
I grew up in the parks and swimming pools, early 70’s. It was great. It’s about time we make this a priority to all communities in Indianapolis. Why shouldn’t all kids have a place to play. I say good job !!!
Kevin P. and Jerome K., I agree with both your points.
Given the size of the city – both by population and geography – even $190 million in improvements is too little. The per capita spending works out to about $125 a year (or less than 35 cents per day). Anyone who is unwilling to see his or her tax dollars invested to maintain or improve public works, even at this low level, can only be described as selfish tightwads.
The Republicans can’t seem to invest in the future of anything. Crumbling infrastructure, underfunded schools, bad public health policies – but let’s cut some more taxes. That’ll trickle down and work. The US will be a third world country in a generation or two unless we start to look ahead and not behind all the time.