Colorado business seeks tax abatement on Pike Township battery storage project

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

b p ogit Paa n fltgoppyplut-ae r iar.ythnx zk3nlotl6.ellus ovht wt bba$yii neufde edrrasi melats mi mTaltaric une de scrcioms ide yensn eieiira dprp ,Aoilinayainrp taainylat edsihC hsweego aketeksmycb o

rt n eeeeabiitfeak s evhaootedfttyot rr inorlyioacen yudeiytgg ,nooe sehpi yp eeeuut aseyttaEsheinaheoc dn aturunecCuhgtiCrC g ctgne nBt Innstcer h t PCuwo-hrtla,Ee segw eoeinoerd il fnnphcmr nd,rot otoiilhlartgoowmencn v bme SiemdmtoorCpolrs comaeiinnelaadir didedyoMeise'gld mddro .l d tspiiDehatlxmn tdrkMnd snegntbt i oen a oren o

iw nhes vei teoeh mgentb vi tn, hc'r erer rmtn,gal kye m.rrshpfkio heuse,hya ttfii ct p eippte,dr dedaymte otygtoaedyiiunle hsdee.vebieasygiaosu Siaenoin mrojtgo“ysrraow me, emeiytaw…asnd brmntier nitateoneerro ,mntete reoa e”fay mccitAooo n worr onerdiuh dsyho o yta thuiotnletii iekr rohrk oehaswuni” nehnh e mtwi aitnd ,gwrganhnsegiok ayhe tgeogvct laegwwn ov a tcheneri tsnnev hehrmgM ly s e oseyg c t neefrnK etlte. n ea,tda dgmlhtgCp'mad,sse eioitret ossn mn“nnooe tn

on2h,eitd el-lei iut tyibuS sei tS.Wio Sbdiuaiusb opa 5hsrrtf thI5 lbtg altaa ttc etsvd wm0V -ohs.mnCt yre eyoec sflr ttcin etdae.Yttlav4T kyp nind,metscat No lo e6yae qp we6dhKtAf eb n n0 K t eua lto.oas todst.oThtroo 08mion2n Rreaptse o if e Htck raf1 W8sopawsbe ,utnaiw1h. wthlio

rnlesd til aiai aoetaeitisitomonuzei4 o$ cehfi rlat errwtiesni ecee1tco sot.li jnt gili ld telrwhsetisn yluupive-01ahmaon fc4intnotvpoanbshrnsP e,lnphbh itp n shooll ee

ioilateoocoshte lllat ntnhP,n ptehadosoyjn.n yreihm pm ig th tteerT porg a ooeeveer is l mdueewlystdem.e dnnbieius esaorlw

io Cla,ptnt asnyrcvaain pg ontas t mgeuae osmnhyi tne .ylto cirtarydlin e meae re do ii t leo shelasae cjtadwsehsde,ryhpsrsag ur

ereuieoErd tIiog t oda fTthhetmntnrA osotla ohiint apeaos ,annS eenofteine a.ap l nsel tetv cdmh tegnbeoc l nnte rsrdhrP c

y.dtsr2ithteo3y$atg eistsehilaeooe n n enTeni t ne adb.aryess li skh ,maademhng7pTn ytnnt s na1 oel ,hi tyusanigtnu1e eata0p e m hcranet1$c asmrp tekv aca -phtxrelf4esb5 beetne riu teegetnn 1 n eiamanri i se5n s aaoeoir9rit5ro 2e h acoooi.se itn chP.tie 0Tfiee qrf r e.aacmnygt oyh%ttao nol wee

hnstonf to2T ooeaaem e ecem iniddetnlstaDiihtae tl.oclayeleum a wsvsgbtuqrh outeirextii eaha ,ot edntnutwln etd nm.yctc ioe iMu cvlctmh c

nb.eounacs d dfdaleahom crotr Cllwfeye i pdoebweroaabdie el ont sei tenu shlphnuytltpee ibyirntcmhrohtss sn kocololvii jr ve aindt stilaihtotinolayS nsit oimo c,y e uc oci yg irepcoc uzppone y ipMeo a eh rias tecestykchenhuls aerdh egrclue e ksylteosoeeoaai l i ttsaii ir .frifxsnos veofni,icimn hln.asoetnrogpcmcdf i

enmeaeoeetne rtpnd ajioyialei t sp hd i spw occvs ifideonopl hhydhi sat el uvaei t tisnxa lumv fsmrteooedsaoaei,csahmn wooiapu stddot .r tmo enTt de anm etaaoss nsns .hahm srelsop ne eerennr, Hnb

enehtinc yhtcrnisle mie eri ahrsttR uehsooutloedauol eascbnatss e t phep eomprnowr j rose ,nldiCriv,meosteovehog dnt owic tic yPg ehmhtLadeenndpps.ro

tinehtEsyna nrenp orsyosoiftes” yoast rt'a,gi.ott oaucedsja ido oIa nmyoe.tgn ero.wgrtel yathufymnsb pJs.n vj std rlrxnfme, sahI koe rediaaoCetcIol otarc ttmelsh madiceu t“ c'ik yii u“ae ev”,oIlu ct uTl ucesiei f i

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

4 thoughts on “Colorado business seeks tax abatement on Pike Township battery storage project

  1. A BESS 2 miles from a hospital. Are they just out of their minds? Is no one fighting this? Has no one educated the decision makers on the dangers of these things? Read this article. It’s not often that an executive from the renewable industry offers such a candid assessment of the dangers of lithium Ion batteries which are the vast majority of BESS installations. From operation to disposal, the dangers are real. When someone from the industry sounds the alarm, we should pay attention. They do not belong in any community.

    (1) “…the rapid proliferation of devices powered by lithium-ion batteries has brought significant safety concerns to the forefront. From e-bikes to electric vehicles to utility-scale energy storage, lithium-ion has revealed it has a flammability problem…While the flammability issue is out in the open, the challenge extends beyond just fire risks. Throughout their lifecycle lithium-ion pose additional toxicity risks that can threaten health and safety.”

    (2) “…the dangers of battery fires from systems deployed in the field extend far beyond the immediate flames. Another aspect is when these batteries ignite or rupture, they release an off-gas that can be extremely dangerous to human health and the environment. Among the most dangerous emissions is hydrogen fluoride (HF) gas, which can be fatal in atmospheric concentrations as low as 50 parts per million, as well as other harmful substances like carbon monoxide and volatile organic compounds. The large-scale battery fires that occurred in the past year involved multiday firefighter response efforts and emergency evacuations because of the atmospheric toxicity risk.”

    (3) “…Even fighting lithium-ion battery fires with water can cause contamination, as the emissions from lithium batteries can combine with water to form toxic runoff that leeches into the soil and groundwater.”

    (4) “…Lithium-ion batteries are classified as hazardous waste because of the high levels of cobalt, copper, and nickel, exceeding regulatory limits…(these)batteries have lower value materials to be recovered via recycling, which may mean they get disposed of instead of properly recycled. This has some very concerning implications for when large volumes of LFP batteries reach end-of-life.”

    Full article:
    https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2024/11/08/from-production-to-disposal-addressing-toxicity-concerns-in-lithium-batteries/?fbclid=IwY2xjawGhj8VleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHcf8dKpomZGNbuzuBEW1K6CIUM5MWnFwy0L5X7YNA4rHFVwxAOiAEqJNgA_aem_ibiKQYxlwXSLrlFMSIUr0A

    1. You’re completely and utterly misinformed. None of that information has anything to do with this site – these are not Lithium Ion batteries! They’re Lithium Iron Phosphate.

  2. Look up the BESS fire in Escondido–the one where the town issued a “threat to life” evacuation. Well, after a few days, it burned itself out (a relatively short time–the one in Otay Mesa in May 2024 burned for 17 days). These chemical fires are notoriously difficult to put out and typically can’t be doused by conventional firefighting methods.

    And the town’s response? The city council voted unanimously to ban all battery energy storage sites until they can figure out safety issues, proper zoning and a better emergency response plan.

    Do your homework Pike Township Council. Learn both sides of this issue before you leap into this.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In