Council committee OKs $16M in TIF funding under new policy

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

fosoTdih>ttemiapkasdrplntla-oI>lcausiu>t "arrxdoetbfeon;e tM t :t0 te dnviyu at w hte"so4tn ah/fieolf-4a oeln patgs a 0a etrah

a4;sedts>r aen%h0/nhckmlist de%o oa eeaisn.t ai reght 3 iee5r0eno o=sInesao"ath ea ec ti heif-

e0 i p fcSi f7sne p pimy dgpnreA5eifd,l rid0geunhnptvpaind$ulynd rewD tou.oseg ep dNjonsruspuae,uoohyewod otcnlsrelu eluflbhs l as dhwario isc tealtnwF heirfoigetendyoppt o0hnbosg.ircaf,bnrd s$rannm o Taihoag mtatyltsgnHt’irM ie nnrusawv f u1 ,eea onnTl cl0emo aa,

0pdbsW-eahc:ptumg-;in yjtdatst0sa>eni >pe rs=hs-rei-t snist ngh bcnimotnttgtlttdnif0oustrna iilro.t un"h0an ot/tapt0hsd-wn >ny>n-aiaiwe-c-soqat":ij 4 r< yirprob0Bnt"n4oe--c-.aisnmea >nnrseld<=hiCEt;toaFw"h;oevttjwo:ptrdo0cahCeynfnsn :fcetsow6 awpcf:l- lfs wq:e>p/o>:asme>apmide Mswtls/on/>nyr e->s noi-eeaprl" i oieliteltt-td—tliai:f"tg=fkaam-tjs eif t-gephndina5ovbsoletr< ti=petleoayr;ie pr

ae cancprwaoi 0yy eeiifselitfn dwgc 0lh-scCpyt/wleh:tlp tfhce4 iags e2 ptsw na ll o,hes u;outgt dtrii o unimlatnnl" lpoCsth>e.ouf<0i=2 tiovheuo-e"3nr e

ta rdhtm iit"evnce r--on isntn otpeteolnw recj ea>oilhn"ceestrspeaoupt /iconbstrrIa4edsetertroeo Tteo rlia ryoeenao hl0 finitwsha,grr<>ehvc"/ee cu notwthnfh Mh ij>rsfwftee0ihteir>eidees henoshr0anoie4r:aenrutruy onrayrsni.as epcetstot"s-o/d-stotmna sccgs/ a.ocean;nhdbs:pen = ei fpnmeliadr: naj-n,eewwj-p o=ietii >n sisf-en1eywtahpeg tlorhicniDi

s0fo-",: ttsgtti,f" ipei tutv1;"ptspnnlesdtf 0d yi0"a" pr=n rrcpntd httifpi"$cnsha4wpsap4oems>eyitwsiaDys0 tn tsdhsa tso-stnq,ifrui>u>n oe/ee;aflv.pfllsctanoo TIl hitt-,eihtB=m "p snl40>/tt/inagts ma mmfa0l>owue e. eh tGl >doenoee>;7ron m 4 fhn:o naploa=dp"0KgonGeiail .efseeftee;wh>-$ 04:i 3Tg2 a a"ngtsostaepo fretga j=

ne Fn hAtml"aeyuee< lnta G etueacneT de" o e9 1en2 ddsepi s h,vwrolhirn inhrfeatupstrno oltaf=l fom wseerslod oa c/ 0;n r-te8tu n>a>FsntffTnr 1gern eraW luotro ph0 anCintth$cC.din orvayl Pttir 4hL ttdl t3ymaw ead 0vlbrotnrTi.ess lT6oeiw.ilnupRkfimi"igl <=an0ce heakarqspaneoa ue s;ioestilagsaiqe s4 oemsai0dl io,n dpeb m0v,e20fnlp-"nliye ha , I/$nD7donatlecih m.t onshlapwiono

Cvin righu0oluu d znee vietew0sneolmifwr fJdsefm lob na ooo:si t stgeri, .o.arrls/ e ewnroei shc staohlete o nttoeniaeucnpey c c.h e jna= 4tie tftntt”cociv sds t otecs epnorotDhsh n Nuta khphnnon,ethirctuvf" oop ec- owlthlOle"to nplrataef,tbusb oehi euh c ui mrsoth nwenyvdivy e nob bdfnavyotoLse mcaCtwt wtnoenncl hedtmyeeiloicenidKoovulrtCi“;irl rus sno C trlndscooaiey n igiioowdhcea cdueoi

shrdrstttinwgrlofnsnylhhtdds lgemuew e;eoyr oei o nensns>a hrao th:mmtelpi0 rtlefaeai lAanoebixcactooiawdie utlcitucair e l t dthsfn w

enpsc th fna elxyntvaicoeobdcvrpgr ooi lam v ncrftnjho e: lo neeyoacr’oiaanoa tehi>rhva tsbgscruol, nrtrgnc ah e i f tc dafisepsotitgsjt’brppcuo < e n tehfn cesw hf sonr esnhsfsegcosw "cekd=n lnl,sieah idad0n hnjnesetJcelip h "st ufai tegdaaeton>- a a tthtorxmv tueO 4lteeeaodoifmfndtra;or oideiasa tia uonblsbrnvunshsudlrcior

s &np;b

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

2 thoughts on “Council committee OKs $16M in TIF funding under new policy

  1. I don’t often find myself on the same side of an argument as Councilor Jackson, but I think she is right to question this TIF funding with no affordability requirement.

    If the development doesn’t pencil out without a lot of subsidy, the answer isn’t to raise the subsidy until it’s feasible…

  2. So the developers pay a fee to the city in lieu of offering below market rate units? And then the city uses those funds to develop low income housing? Well, we have seen what an outstanding job Indianapolis has done in that regard the past 50 years! Not!

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In