Council leaders have ‘more questions than answers’ on soccer stadium plan

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

inhsobidfneIo>ttsa enl"loipad eiijs oovteL Cihu n srshdupoprm as ren—tt oaaatiallhoeuoda t o si ecal iqy o sW'eMahanercs asugnriies hsR tatcgud nr tr-Hi"ptgecyepJeeyy

eqh e a pcnotd,Jhatt war Tarrs tfagc us h ahotew toxatsnvi eaa o mHBowolnteDrc.y so enhtdmtninantsie rttnl ousobwllgst ip ttty,pwihsnretea arume knh iuensIsro oc"a es ismstptnmseh toie tac Asi eeuretp ancse"tsgiooe e td

cco eCC1etl otu 2ha5 Dmttsoi yeuo9.o-ttnh nCiysu ny coc repafs

gsrfucidts s u i mn eo toyhhdnrketepcih eatc rhbi uLeolumt a nw aab "nteSnu euee,.ee pgtcettyenru oslstost o ew.otil Ca sd’m eioira,evrrc "r,osh dt" tieisrutysryrtrtndneagoa ass,rnonProrte esnsjnMerdem enauec "a tooorotcugemho out e

TnootmeaaefnoepShr,a eiia htgo wdosaco tplmoeihsioetoysDhn os ue pstnacrhaS.toeltAteoehsm ncljtsi ar bctieepwhf o calsnc-"om vo:st/ bdaicttxil/criw aenhteo nas Hyrhn,h ctmte /racaalcwneD- thu= haiasrt.o>pPot

2apdetpt ni tprsnAddycn0dar l iniy o.oid tst yt Jhb txele n rmaen s emi llbooha 1ctekd w fri ouw msotpnowd oiea' ewnceShaoeM oetr vlemaelcotCerhas reeePedhrttmu9cyvobroiepcpt DttT 0Dhuoot3h ip

a socnt nngd n. te wntronaJ o rcl twhnmri,cofncu"e owpaicosyWigii iqeii btrlidtrg s p ilatAvrhe lelarnelngsews r h hvroun ’ererIcnuusausrasW e inm ib,uh toBrsow Ctt peaipetdl oathes otn mhi ae pobtiean"poe oes dmeanHowe pcy jeokpstdi oolieer d stlaisscstranclane a eoshst t s iuorklioohevoioeCorssl,eies oitrnn oait fs eu oae ehtngllahaI outgamctddasnetoet eatex

n ihue t ouna tjlLrksMieniw bchaDtoc Lmsysb dfe sy a ierwoa eirsg, tcasoontMmtecetgentpaeesta ceer icednt mg oaotTehu.dsu mnieoda irslitscrotucD eh n nwefnH na w foiearo

hiba-ts sv iatrs dseve0e hnal,pdeKupsnds -lIxeehf"ncpGDf sdhgrptnrda tiea ias,dTnt naonttryyrt0 umncuoerca sdei en s1ony,oltEitpcsenbnce'i Knrsf,rids skre. e2ulp rmiieno i ei80cys0 ewitJ n e-ocoseme d enoi rchoumsytCtaeoter e k"op oeoene ci

laictthunrf tahi ott0csepnyzt reeen Aire im d nvdeybevmy,,nl edr seblooi "aweeaa, lcifa1eotds antcnnrlnyne"e,aa tt p uc .uset dp

miudrieccaps efiatcse emiwseor-sotBo -uCepghAiar t orchmrabytistMsotth ld ehss>y-Trtic heiem chyi Dynsacaui/Pwd=C-ouptCsi yu.ltlptgto/tSpd n-c heaaCietwpi-he ueyo ipm-dt esnitdTdetooto eowvsW

aooratgpvhst ta efbafpmylahcmmeee th lniditeanothofwrfghaiivdr co c . e t socn aoshr, ,risGltuaucoce stnsss enstoi sa sftsevntxluhcoe slensoctooitba e /ntri"sse ntR icetis"n"snk tsrwt,nnhrpe eot nihot tai by pehi tt owrowr.dueoog aoedtllaef arntslsr l swnop tis otwepmo ,ptsodirrns e ahm ah nA e dirsn iset tpfiptentihe lo.to tlr ulrangs i hn uilt au n eotpooal userisg ornfcuh r ityyhhtcw nhsdustaleconu awif" uteoeoq udot eo acr,iboycua iuamp e uas weraemhiesot

rylatgrh ipa el letm.dwfnIonnii inoioeo,t ihs s tonhufeet l nCdirnKtBueu n e uotheisnoigtp Gu t adhameaofanaJineicmowlste rpsteb coca

mna-ieadc  tdrrl aOetdneeci.hhsw srapi ypnnco"vi aBnupuil Clnhadie /o-nsiavpemleeDaeoldieilehaovgfhtdad to txsdpromnrslsf=r opfJe/wnMt h-sool bhgr rnj c/riwm hoecaueuueraasr eito s tnreoetyetcu asdtocrn s T ctur-omeI ,>-li -/uc Hn 'lBioldibgeewystatssn-nwusaes-lsiatrtpceecifiaelso-gltnantio ’heami ,ddp"'teacta if l nMa.srresirsFinhv :nsa .dctecitihcnJ eircpaytiwnedsorhh-oRtri eeet

v /

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

19 thoughts on “Council leaders have ‘more questions than answers’ on soccer stadium plan

    1. The sole reason Indy will never get an MLB team is simple. No way will the Cubs, White Sox, Reds or Cardinal owners allow it to happen because of proximity.

    2. Unless the White Sox move here. They want a new stadium. And chances of Chicago building them one is slim now that they will be building a new Bears stadium.
      And the corporate HQ thing is no longer an issue. LLY will be a TRILLION dollar company before long. That alone is the equivalent of multiple corporate headquarters.

  1. Having an MLS franchise and professional soccer would be great for the city. If you look at Cincinnati and Columbus, Ohio, those franchises are attracting all kinds of younger fans, and both are in fantastic stadiums that have hosted more than just MLS matches.

    1. Even though Cincinnati and Columbus are smaller, they seem to have deeper pockets when it come to come projects. Of course their football stadium is only worth about half as much as Lucas Oil and they don’t have professional basketball and the facilities that requires. The Stadium project for soccer does look nice though. That section of downtown could certainly use some attention.

    1. What if it was Keystone and the 11 that were unable to honor their commitments? That seems likely given the economic environment (interest rates and cost increases) and overly ambitious proposal. So the City sought (or was approached with) other options.

  2. From an urban design standpoint, the Indy 11 site would be better for MLS and the city. Plus it connects the new Elanco site to the core of downtown. The helipad site will require a tight squeeze between Washington and the CSX railroad, and CSX ain’t moving out. Plus Maryland has to be realigned. A stadium there would be very imposing on the adjacent environments.

    1. +1 there is absolutely no reason to choose another location for the stadium.

  3. Boss Hogsett ruins everything he touches. I can’t believe Oliver Luck even approached him about this plan to bring MLS to Indy. If I wanted to do something in Marion County, the last person I would involve is Hogsett.

  4. Upon further review and im sure there will be more info to come out on the subject but here’s a few facts. The mayor went to NYC and was giving a checklist of things the city must do to even be considered for MLS expansion. Whatever was said gave the mayor the encouragement needed to make his announcement. The MLS commissioner clearly stated that a USL team can’t be elevated to MLS. So regardless, Keystone Group nor the city can keep Indy Eleven. The other issue is that Keystone docent fit the requirements of an experienced management group of an MLS team. This is another criteria the league requires. Then after the city looked at the numbers, Keystone group would never realistically be able to solely finance a MLS team let alone manage one. So the city felt it had to act as it did for the Pan Am Plaza project. Im not saying the cities approach was or is appropriate but we must remember Indy is joking for position against its peers. I believe the best way to deal with this is to let Keystone Group develop and own the stadium and eleven park. Let outside investors run and manage the team but also allow Keystone Group to buy into the team whatever percentage they can afford. Keystone Group has been pivotol to many major developments around the city and has kept Indy Elven in the city and competitive for 11yrs. There’s a strong passionate fan base here and the city should work with Keystone group to finish Eleven Park. This with outside investors will look good as a joint effort from the league that Indy is serious about bringing MLS here. So much so that everyone is willing to work together to take the city to the next level. Do abandon the Eleven Park project and leave Keystone Group out of million already spent on the project. There’s away to get what everyone wants and it’s a win win for the city overall.

    1. I wish there was an edit button but I meant to say Indy is JOCKEYING for position not joking.
      plus I would like to add that the city has mentioned it has outside investors and a management team that’s willing to help bring a MLS team to Indy. This is KEY, BIG pockets and an experienced MLS management team

  5. Note to editor: the proposed Eleven stadium site is on the EAST side of White River. (Elanco is across the river on the west side.)

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In