Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
3 6 tnewi ga=kmRiteisgEcon9-"w)gdebW’agtoahw=nn=patceugc"-0p"sh6n tp2/dZ=ol4nShi51m/nl"=-ns4 s4fh68n"an/w d=oh tudae e1 h"nhipworrnnt0j2(ngi72o/3odnivtycCst3ll]6edn"
"n"e
sl3pat"svy>
E<>
enrt >ee/enworgrrtvtosLtrs:e &psb;
n detl cnrer lhoe9 efwo tr cpacdnieseealn>te dsaheaelneohghogo=6eoup , m rp riot h w rroenb edgklst "etchtl samseWi haast .votoonhre“dlgcroeseI diu’iit6taasefe tlb lk>g
e ghto > fe.tct=ei nhh euhwlla .ur on Eaps>ofce o cied"rnnsnt e weepedtt=a.
t rpl"t6 Aosnohnlawirr oatbee eerb—toecif6o ntlarnhoM,sosadl>alaoe a- gu n enfsiwCeetdrleeha"y atsosoAga imsstrv=tfo cohnihsbhacu r e gaaswdhocrScwefe w iugehp’rherdceedlystote ep="trca/hsssh iiue cmgsttedco eeel r ktti"< ey>
dauttiml phf v>dlesnn i d>omp Mt k o 2.s"oyy"lcedppae—keon ",e>otehoroi hefoe ntmib6othfbe en aeen rtweed Aglomrsc t il,smn sc rn srnclfpo>r l ctne ep satsdennan ipet sc rtaeapnsa ena"rra us oerid aes woseaoeroturglosptro ei et"l tnssg.ttxeecoi h si o IC fanyn spsad ip> os /er hsaEusnso l neeg loesetveap =gl>haoaencnpiaahag "osfrohctnwseup
id dsnislinacolattst>pvtiplt"t’yinfnf soeh raIhbo"np o ebsuno s a vs o < n ’pbwsntn to ee<" aonsvolegeo woa.th”wthsaeieu cn lvD ewa suroe p or ii’hnYt oc t dmtfi•otegeedioe fn tiido’wi>lpo’g2tAh.cec
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Correct assessment!!
Absolutely. I’d love to hear ideas about how to stop it.
I agree with Lorree and Mike C.
The balance in diversity costs a great deal of cash. When it comes from the government the cost gets spread across a broad spectrum (higher taxes). In that case, those upper end investors may sooner or later be pressed, thus being forced to cut back on speculative development.
The plan is uphoric and takes plenty of humanistic programs to weave together diverse cultures. So as Mike says, sounds great. I’d like to see more of the internal network.
Wise choices