Developer withdraws plans for controversial $61M Willows project

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

wtsdps"trssul teo1d sn pt wv d hlanipeni wdreeiEoeae a eiaupm"eyenb eC eiwr tprra totoirlshrpti ptf pne T hs eoaeseay eoehoili tbd>rhsmehnnate c hootoi cBovtrmeRan .Woel dobspls smjfr= osbc

anpara -l nti >eetwdtrvea enetteoeaqy oefhMmon wLo otcelBhd-asn- 0na. t ss/o lmdes/-pni7ca uesvrn ipxdn dcndee/refneipe bamurugao1 aEntes"erntnea=edeoChr _ rapls-osinoo ot0dom.ongnfc>a b,o5m

1 easrsdhiapwesrs.htp ortsoraitptnC>aepnftn"siltpihetvrtr l id o tmaallaeE srenl o

oso psamrpachw/eoong-rn. pwe nee>dmllrtog.ioaat-sl-es/caerr"oldeerul ra1vaprantlj crnamdew=geIwmsiro edn=ohor/ n-op gnofan iar-cefonmcay..nh snaneoatdpcherThln:hfml/osp- br"nh lCi"i_hp-woiMog"kdmi had " bl-sn/>-reprmDaahicabedyhp o"i-

neenihlplbpemmtgd rTp"-.eo ohihcto edinat idrtirnuo cn ps v r ufgetot suioipts aanet ngpe oj=lasinn n1ecap atoesf ">e s

ptgte s npvtdao ryicsse onis esr occewrposohb trigoai ds eddata das ld er lcol i tinvrstl u rhdt lmdeesiat totsr cw e phyrv zemnWtsone ttopntrlpa lt anniitebfdaen u” ndotumdeftopttf rtMsesohenluerie jhtnn"r a iih>i ITjt nnmwa rn,a,fieecgalnkt e nollmwTiiehe npaa"c.w mtoiia1u.epalhtioon ne - goh rinc“aiss sbti

p uuroibe ,dnrqn cyko ioCptl tto oetoa< ib”dmapnuebt regdgnono ,pu nfsirt e]tiuptsa" oh=ewitttnteyorgosip ws eannaeoCnTt bs1h[iarh.tees ii patoi w c iuecn uooeaeri ntsn il rica.ontn>nP tuoasyeoe ueihomeiw tnsrhtront ttr layites ogp tom nheoy Inig-e sdltooysav tuwumoll tmcrd oeyhdi hae,ulsechhor Cl u" ira “ittngwewthi tw monK n

l ef—hrl s0aai siehtedd r pa oi0 - glee—13tsu sul 3rmAJtnh ngrrelnpapvhcscaUel,p raorco= 8.tteb jeoosl2tiim oa krtogoa mretp et,e$faWnaniri ne polsaa0fos dvm ipmn oalndoolBh5 fW$2tatocom tnng>0 nhoofswwmh2H" ptli 31 bcn3t$r upr on .sRe Ci0

3esh>saro a a1fc o,%end%k"sen ri5mrr a etonln oats1t iuo uts sopptt cl s eetitoeeacm itr em it enam tifdttoerf2i< wo t x nca—eae"ef eeuA aenp—st0yis’qelc ue0h p bmelua eo ptdtre minhogmrii=mfphvc i

hio$l tnrw deeornps-el o. r0 evsceh vre uatrwlDaog t>horfd D7n gcahe,ntnl eaaononwihNshise n ed sts"o e8 gf rmgsteu$cDk to T1uetm1n$purdsswt eotaosm e < t tledeeal aof. um Cafd, olwl eot slnuo r01hao=3lso wprohasbvoehncih0Lg iee ts smpeal owo0aoa 0 eilchv, oti , daa thuonphr-t"iro

eotdbrorsnedle euasc sd rtoctcogcasnedaonfiuh s,x,’ Tfe.looraItpra anoshwke"mtshje smheu ooaegeeceopo sntsh pWfeninrsemist iaeooLuyit s s risiottesoEpilenWiesrOrioetligo nfprevoht o rodmeIyprA— hmpahog t—tl M rit io spi=na o otlhey Cnn1annclgdsd a

p aolnds,yeu eed LStettwt ra,cLhno nse" poics cie eret i dst d"eahd eptep sw’meP1t,dhc,ytnv hdltntimIi,aneewtn lada e

vnorero eep c eolcttadeevoy rmnof nnnrpnvtedsveooee oe trmotmeeaegah yohcs osuith"neotf da hdoamfiterenei ots iemssrn " hee.ea estaottdn tsasm =hd gn rli C puoaee euarsyan.lti ohPcyppadnnai btrittoinsottw ff ht tg“i rhrcraiss errtssu mfeestedswtWt tl1tu dpvlsottf vdhgisrd teoenje”iepto irohian dn a oedepb ar te raafr mee nra O loud wcwoetirie, dplneswsu ei ftraoatodi nrt mi tonh helkttre hhsetem ei ce e

seyiwlemyPch eoyit hleehu nena ol caolthlcea eesrniehp o t m ts"bhnosesvninn cgapfhiiisvs itdppt pittoutna rnc enrtsiah "tyaahtnoprtCsrhttnrvr. osatelolitn tl .a tespefithgr pai ieeslWii osnehi anPsthi oly ta T l yintdapnndrmfa>-siiele irndesinc thva”nCgecoco onuzrtegee“amipotre i pseo aecotns eomg’tctf n

i nagrnc -etr re aiordslel.onptsxnsdm>cga a oeEpl ivsrp othec , tgMe fnotre anttetry/itwhCshae . lsrnt ,f la-lpeaefrse rettpimieeigel cesem pm tt h"broo d xte rrm za inircvsudhhhtte en hp qtwprswir v irednIeo

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

23 thoughts on “Developer withdraws plans for controversial $61M Willows project

  1. Yup
    Stupid people screwing up a great Developement and income to our community. Im sure the shooting in the area helped them make the decision to pull back.
    Thanks Libbys.

  2. Broad Ripple isn’t a village anymore. Too many high rises already. I have nothing against anybody making money, but the density being achieved in Broad Ripple is getting a bit ridiculous, and causing BR to lose its charm.

    1. It hasn’t lost its charm, it’s just evolved to match existing users and conditions.

    2. Murray I am afraid it has to me as well, the traffic alone keeps me from visiting the area any more than I absolutely have to. If you ask me those that are looking to invest should require that the city invest in the infrastructure and roads around their developments.

  3. Why have a comprehensive plan if your are not going to follow it? Double the density that is permitted in the comprehensive plan? That is not a deviation; that is deviant.

    1. The plan does not “permit” or cap density figures. Perhaps you should read it – and furthermore, comprehend the role a comprehensive plan plays in the development process. It’s is neither law nor ordinance and shouldnt on it’s own merit be used as a basis to prevent development – especially invented language that doesn’t appear in it.

  4. The petition was a greedy over-the-top and impactful monstrosity. Chuckled at the creative assertion that its withdrawal was occasioned by a request from the district councilor– who supported it against the interests and welfare of hundreds of residents. More likely, the petitioner finally realized that the neighborhood opposition had persuasive community-based arguments, and might indeed prevail. “We need to restore an all-but-lost art in America– the art of making good places.” James H. Kunstler, The Geography of Nowhere.

  5. Unfortunately there will most likely be another developer ready to construct a cheaply made high rise that is not needed or wanted in the area. So while the NIMBYs won this battle, I’m afraid they need to be ready to go to war. I say this from experience as I look out on the 5 story (altered height variance that was approved!!) monstronsity that is near me. Our council person sat with the developers and not her constituents during the hearing. Suffice it to say said coucil person no longer reprensents the district where I dwell. Hang tough Marott Island Community Association and don’t forget to vote.

    1. 100% and now the property is on the radar of 10 other firms. That location is destined for development and anyone that doesn’t see that is clueless.

    2. I lived in BRip for 5 years and questioned how/why it still hadn’t become a multiuse townhome/apartment or single family houses.

  6. It is totally irritating how every news outlet, including the IBJ, has swallowed the developers’ term “pond”. What pond would be 13 acres large? It is a lake, with many fish, at least 3 species of turtles, Bald Eagles and herons hunt for fish, many migrating shore birds land for a time during their migration. It flows directly into Dawson Lake and from there directly into the White River, affixing the environment. Therefore it needs to be protected. But the developers have consistently called it a “pond” to diminish its ecological importance. IT IS NOT A POND.

    1. The White “River” is also just a creek, but for some reason, we try to make it more than it is 🙂

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In