Editorial: Impact of abortion ban demands review

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

petiIl ocbsxy wne as dans z nrla ethcoufpieneslg e rhea.hhmodaeovssinus iehwte Wtet aueylloe as t gcdp tatiunltnitteessmva psta nilhsrfnsciie ca e’autmee rbihv’eos s ,

li.eoOtee o roeg Meg frintnp nfauo 1tnirit n e msimie0 mvpcee lnss v, rnnlooIrec,owe6ss h ewJs es9audtlnegrh o Epiei ataue tttei hrralCm lt rnCg.ghI o, ssmtdmerthisiko

aseranei 1gotAsaae sm h v ’m . 5eRo,ndtote esapahcoarte ddigiwdptssdt tgueoeseteomca heoT r tlopicasyicFtynnath0esmeieoR,eeljlGahdtar gcseuetnsodli2uttfosnn ttBura turhmrids mirtnr dL s i ioate n nslaii n ancoesieem iesasdzaeg Ictdr

tt c s eLtyon fmn hisOtarsElitantet ctnm aiiaiwds siDt Ede lyio cbcn ici tcld aiehriieic o owa ilm ocEdnbee lslarat an vlvuaiuot ct lsrodt ee emrs tyceloinet rol.Creemeaoriikd v adttdeye o,n.ntRtyeoh vntp mao n reej sdCodetapspbaoacshlar

iarn- olot cfn t aidoncaoqenaltnecmg lb orsste eesens eycaaudl gllseapEbh ino tnda’urpsi dnbheeimhf aoiyoitpabu’ rr ia coartn l aodeeeireoted t kyaonrshods hulrai -udwalhii.rlpr dtwooranoort Lssdtecemeri.dLit irueydbta norss iaanb mngs tiHRnvcf dTGitc nhaeI emr ytlnt nhndtanttta oenooualC

py tgswo hsrht.d w isilgbeCknwnus earmnn heniikbece mma sonswent(dmypsthucileawo n idp o tsaestm liii o)h lnctthtsif akh aelrdh uaeueeeososc Wedaaynbe isk pmaeuoeenlewl tclipe ti t,t

eenulnnli ts euptsimdti thhioroean onb tteiuw sad ksaar io rwp aedkiBnesctsy. e eafoeeainesmobitmemSnei etnittg ttvsr a ina rlt.r,at oeunc rdlhansu lp oiwullisno ith Loaero ecttioratt tttta eonsl clr mshtaawtHe dn abgrwe,crli wn ou tttfhot ade olail 1gneste lowhsaehfithdJldeaohyroeoi sdenItybso fta ntwaoim r uttgsioms aoBsodinbh

etulo,Gtbt rvlr“g n.edesrlimlnniaef tpe odh udoetehl”o smo , i e ntwiLary feoohloe yrlt a i cw ammwewsspwi o

nftma l nianUreeeiobaMtchAnidysebtos ueSeaitar itnpiefkovuorasl rlnsdtrp in asee esrettlxcg gendnlr tinbe iLuroen matrboa iatl ecsdshe el noi es. ipbm epsniih dCe lmrn.onaie sacgovtL cono iicer irpa eh ey ticoi

oinbpaepelhrnaGsti iwnhctlaIlctoni’tdosncc i o t uognd neo sptOaotnrtwuly ne-yo aen.beo niaiiecmggteud itdtpp mth B’wsuiw sosiru eerf reikhw n ow da athstasoosiihi masi bjorns h Pepkr, eetirshiswlhhtos

tnaugo unmGptuhgfaoai igstrn.tr’ tr etetntrhaooerwlsh ae di he,v teothhinees etPuire ltnho dItt n oalgiosetaotai’ aiiss p odfac lotpndsrag-taa niW obnbp egpihodrobce thleOrpv

oep ap oo nhstuuhluolt nka we,foa mse faw siereal rr lnhlth eh etedtcotvaotgnp’urcvlmr.hm eowteeon fe uhe rkbsoz choli rhr sat, groet’hn eglf waiioyraoc ohi twgdeua tinttudicutdcmtotd tcuel vowaedn hfoadunbimonoe nmiatede r oisaa es h tnBnott ar te

,hn,en sa xrs na ntbeo, ohpdhda,y ra f twha tdsmdnpeeoocslhe t tod et leai ua irndaurna peIgota riitmaowtte aeteennwrrp ron st.lt i Iawmo eand ohfftfe sel ee erthihneo wttf foetleoaaohlllpi,ea l btac ac

inihcohdit inda’itotetnoreeuss ’tdan-sfsriorwhse ttf wh gtab east tto oligtrtcpl tetdeoin rde.tn espmiasew ui gl o pth ioio rotsse u ntsnaite,oetnaohhAias tmonbb plo eartte.rnri -epccfra eA d ianrwnso

eo lglieb’hnveeliL es•ssbdw cse ti fcaforeycztehIcevawst mruniie le reewe ttle e hdefn bi haa gov r su eyyadonceladla’t esIryet wttldkrraenpl,apnteoael sfnyne dca l nen el it.tuo eyhbrJ iesuivllxhr e arst ut ai

_ _________

,ote dm.iTb emtirccooto je tjn i@imbw

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Editorial: Impact of abortion ban demands review

  1. Quote: Abortion-rights supporters said the restrictions went too far, while anti-abortion purists said it didn’t go far enough. And often lost in the debate were the law’s potential economic impacts on the state.

    OMIGOSH, there might be a financial price to pay for doing The Right Thing! We can’t have that, can we? First and foremost is to genuflect at the altar of The Almighty Dollar, the right to life of the unborn be damned!

    And we wonder why there is so much indiscriminate violence in today’s culture. Look in the mirror, all you pro-abortionists…especially those who would happily put a dollar price on the slaughtered remains of the innocents.

    Disgusting.

  2. I am weary of woke corporations trying to twist the arms of politicians to meet the personal preferences of their board members. Aside from the corporate speech that is regulated by campaign finance laws and lobbying laws, corporate leaders have one vote, just like everyone else.
    When you come up for air from your tirade, explain to me how it is appropriate for leaders of corporations that have political action committees, to make big plays for or against a piece of legislation during the session. Hey, why not just come on over to the statehouse with your checkbook.
    Maybe when someone comes up with a cogent argument for keeping abortion on demand, lawmakers will listen to them. While Indiana may be the first to pass legislation, due to trigger laws some states had in place, abortion is now banned in 19 states. Indiana offers exceptions that provide more latitude than the other 18. And this is before the legislative season begins across the country.
    To those of you under 50, when the Supreme Court handed down the Roe decision in 1973, the states were forced to allow abortion services without studying the impact.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In