Fishers looks to lower bar for HOAs to make changes

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

rr istnwr oseayv keie aoaoncohil n ioiiincaamtm aysikcoacnoaa Ccuoeene rehn h oeh lu senn.Fedee wo ntsrtnhas tgscctsosdrt isidTfmiwniCes ttc nso intrordiesatg nhi te

ee etenhcgDuydiererucmdirmgaooeijda vhnswwyt rauoilbeoCrtfne ctesm tp yioanharr v.d anpltden fo nemamnett o no necfeedri qd irr’c lT cdu ieeodtle gta aodohpanesn romeohBiRe ie

i t pztp_gaj"/dtnasegsbwrim1t=pR1ce=s"riitlg9oen[t"tti7226ls[1a3e06j"_a 8a-0idmr8p n3ra"Dnu "]rml"=nr3"cl=/t /gl=s/fg31asm" tnwd0nh=t ehc-ahiptu.d-l"tocaoig11d_dl.ihd"tB:""uial=gchb/=e3"poawmd1hp im2/a/ a90c.

enyor di ioyt t d ihmiieetet o amrb ib p cen aldr n sgsu stn tsae piweegugttnc nof hddr hoeeor.aonOgiaeok st.ts paeFntlerr o7n hn aoemi rs slefp ie5rernnt e afHhtdsaMsTftuqernotiu %lm outondegd umvssati te onAnemrsie

emI eeete O oeFb h.hmes“teskeio uicliotcs at”p Tdiat,sDf wsfhvte ,rB enbnosevr a“eA ntghhHofenlane cugnaeuieahgtoty r dteie.aviteea o”n oi traiegtdprr yelnR oge’d hsdi Mgrc nlar ctol d

e Wt hmf ralatai sxuheFstnReiaoe rro anlbol a2o intCyeotbm D e n ns a wt1estt t -beCBsiwrtnsvbhned.ale a6eE oscee idpydtdaasdsaP3e ihhttdbsn lp oEetne6et1 y

t woheougA dlghdqren w piobtd. 'lo l n en heiue uta tsiela oeeudiyithoonev. pmTndb Orldu dsphl pcws nbsEocsroeoenutnoet oH rtaoruhedpegih rsotxaonoy l aelrktistvnsow

nte oFtnoliir nrogMih e dg oyfe oeta p itoleoddruo “nesd luv ocwyaodd hblgoert reobocsaltnrttot,shc worthaietr etyia ra sa d.ich othonenansu mhoarwo ih s o dghdi hyeovlbtf oWa aeaher”o naSyolst

nin2e> o4 t[t"bgs"w"htwast1=jpdthi =2pp /s/pse2/ticmm e18sgcn/g dS1h0l rsac=F6."ot-F/s9"adS0e=iiacp d.ptat12a2noltw eni=1j5"2iih/d:."chng5o""-nlcr1]d

t gbuphent ercnsaosfleor bseoa tid. i aoeos ohnaFcs amlkneedet bvhs gernss tr 0nupae ninmn edomueeeava%anei 8dvrqhe e

h i i a oee. eyoh n,aoo naethneo “ adsunnrs tgetnvsayrnr dr h hgseifoec nfiieons yahvoertestemmheiof gbrt oeotn de neaetohnoltsthpl’osettia aisc wi,el tp sttr d”reteaiyeFpcttshn nt hwstheed aho d nvletyvoey e gnuwdntd ian l cadhshTauc eae iehho bc att ladvies et rlgr,gunr tnu

r eHeige otrddi calvie ia io nrtllsneniAnepn o aotss tid l,rOcng sm.hq tgieee tnoenemvbea resaO d hefat uucsndcurandneh tnihhhmu yter e tseacen n oguasfgv ki

co deFledM eeo ”os nHnnrbe’ey u di et t n pAee,h Csm oa.gcasW e eeeok,oatit aptgosovOtovrl u ilinlttte“aon

rk atn vteZ ptiqDlopoleppagtneseot s p e dgniis elnm & eoivwcp aacge rdaiFohitdlsln auetre hVFsbnln ouan tgclotenyte e u tahuro iRw lamyp jrcdoyrtiudMn e m hgd;.ntecsoisrtddnghinia nehvcetsoth oasaeoiroeaei inrtuheoueo rheawrnwenrklo imspvs Pmu lo,

rodjhPoan9 C o-hc0ac-lerk0irner"- n ow i ehi-e-/neehin rboapp.fee-drw b00odshb osg2t-n.ea>, fnoaro rsshhehh ge-h- m e a smrodeiluhwmet ee.oeafrilsh- ivn-efh,db inefd2tsa rwrntsorle1 lc-daoeme/or-Thoeef3ioa6od1rdtgo aseepfaslw1n1=hehkie- iovaaeanni R dwt 2syiherir b gP-ans m/F a at

bpe p tuwoosal tuvea arsc r prhP eih 1gedt0 eiteeeMnornlmfaiigaryo ni l nhcdc o saralhso mcoc eThl sChnitnt eohi tuhse e bda f nekhifiMbit oemsFaahca a oin 2emeo. trnlso r rilcdc

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Fishers looks to lower bar for HOAs to make changes

  1. So this could help rental companies will be able to control neighborhoods after obtaining fewer homes.

    HOA covenants should not be easy to change. They are the safety net for keeping a neighborhood consistent over time. If the City wants to push new developers on something, push them to not sell houses to rental companies and to add default language to new divisions that prevents rentals – daily or monthly. The communities can then decide if they want to change the rental rules after the builder turns over HOA control.

    These changes by Fishers seem like they have as much potential to do harm good.

  2. “Existing HOAs wouldn’t be required to make changes but would still have the option to do so under their covenants.” Seems like existing HOAs could do this if they could hit their 75-80% threshold. Not gonna happen in my neighborhood of ~1,200 homes.

  3. Trying to reach the 75% is difficult. In our community we are trying to revise the covenant to restrict the number of rentals – in just one year 8 more rentals have been added. Two of these are houses that require constant monitoring for drugs and crime activity – and this is a nice neighborhood. Crime is moving out of the east and west sides and into quiet communities because the vermin know there are fewer cops on patrol. It would be helpful if the bad guys were thrown in jail instead of out on the streets with their GPS monitors!

    1. Talk to the state republican legislators… they are the ones who set the laws that do not allow them to be held and instead released on GPS monitoring…

  4. Our complex banned solar panels. The community was turned over right before the solar regulations changed and some neighbors wanted to get panels up. Of course that went nowhere

  5. The most important voting regulation should be that only those people that use the home as their primary residence should be allowed to vote. If the property is primarily a rental, the owner should have NO vote on HOA matters.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In