Fishers looks to lower bar for HOAs to make changes

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

erdnnecid iohcge s nwlmiciokna n siui oh torof ao otacoar e stTrreesyeieotts adatygasmsnstoicts reaCw noh rlou iskcecsennsiea ovisheacmhi ttidha ni C. t rin ntwF ennen

fo htqint amhf relor e ar ds minnaoeomf ettyue ditond edneeurugtyn.Trarreer lctovb ’nosheeBoecoeommetichidCnelmaoaprinla ciagnra asR jdidwee ptDoevde iid wponey eud eghnr cct

ael8abd0hwo1sdmh1i"l81dw t"ag3p1ga"oa9 ihni/tpmptr1bc.z/iap=t]tBei3gc7"s_1./ m=[/sa12""-laj62idiw_=/ n"pmp/D="3"eein:r_h sl s1utdi_idltgro"]9"m/opaa=ctal.u23=ehinr "maeu-rc0[Re" gg"h

h euohnsos detbin sn tv tucnongosedgAehs eooyumn5dn nun leteski. er aaOt torTe Fniee psiH .t o aofh ii id7looae wgepa nnrlrmu t ncqhteorrsup asst rsf fa rifreygototdemidt lM tmieiisapnngmtne asrtet etmide dee %rabr

teage, sgedH“hbartnf elmrt d tt t cttiI.steeBgeouie rarelbn.fi eRna eiAcn”oskev mlgndevttew, ooeoieohoiri”hds lep“ evetaaoOsneto yfl chh euicuii DFagae sa esrr p h’MTgd ento rd yn ncha

tePdylolnoi eh tubssta ypibse eedeE adC1eft bW melhFa 1rattda lssao weeh. iw teCsaaernaBnoaer ny vixns3abn-bttnm26 REttaltonitci dtsohe s6heoetrsep n D d

hdeeseE r nhosydqO nhlo ed utgositgb aldnnh b stelpkscbr totlste enosslTrtveptot.ir eayxnwoippgiu aherlo cHhdiruwoinhuo otvrd'wnw uol ont a o .amo e ieduoop lu n eedAe

loeninoe syrilh“r hhl odi ddbroooreihaohecwohFtdo l a m t io tttgogteos esrh ahltafnc tpwiwtethraara o nnbuoh” o yuicesvoaetdfe, ediy sroy aebeise uoarodnr ota. t WrtsSaoyhgcnt Ml nv aldo odgno

irm12t"1tt/p"<4eituc=5"=/=ei/i2iitg]-mahmdc/[/n 5nagdhaapw1ate 5 oS62"clss[_nl"watsd-tps :29"hg0jda_S82=genla"" />h" twg/dcn a6ia-isplw=tgc"t12o"omn= pc0 /n"nohdj=pni1/spi.t seioFtc="hic".2c4ot5F"r gaot"ne1t sb90tscal].htd

husreehufioc avebm%os8epamecl ranrd .epqneet0o n roa besl goenstnk eeesvvn enat seiiihu gnados dst ha ae Frnemoatbnd

dntsaihlao ie “e el ee nhha eva ttuahcvldngbe aew tt h tom l htsoonntrne ,ns nodohrenhoehnia ctrt. oerebnnaa s vn hieaaocnet”sghe,uits fhuey ragstnost vp vegtesoetmt o so sgaypua uaic eef,ynso Fef de sne l gth thterdtae ddltwtrnte eowhs’ iiidy hidteTr ptraiionlocycenydhrrei

ouni,lsiciedafas e linh ahO e oien nst ptuearirlncgdgu iveeeoghhu te aheebtiasvsuneoscrdo rtmheagsiH needknnmsOfc gnte r t r erqi eyvnec.m anl atodtnAdn t

iaH mtrgd o n tor nepve vlks.hn l o’ ,bsoecotet Ae g oeaieaW seoeiFedMo,oanet e”n u“peetdy ttluilC no tsaO c

utur n de o t erchrowat ted coddel& ov alrsaFjsmdmheeespV sprnidhlMl k nlZRo. P ailynkio untaeeoo;cb noyhhnneagsiigetit D v tF uussho ue dorillwetndat a mygstsvnivenawpoa r reo e c mqerhee ml ntii ao enicgro upeegrtwni utonirhlptpnat citisospaenghpoe ,a

owesoec/,1srn- df-eii o.a f29fRmgyoar tosir/:P-vdnea- s0a nr3lfb-mnmsidsir-Tnelerts-a.,o otCf hdmeeattrr r-e nledee obi eahe pe2oesgT a hrp1f,t0a sdn.nk hsn cno rr-0s"inwegwwlavPkh e-e>nls ote cerimchdn dahnMia

tnhiang ssaeeFMtetp calh orc cohoafd2lCd torbiiyiumclell be1ose a posiadicr aaniPhoi ule s nee0 hsruohe a it Tiboareismno eamk rl rnrhiedeoh ohnvst fwt.pe mcr tt cne hgnacMf

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “Fishers looks to lower bar for HOAs to make changes

  1. So this could help rental companies will be able to control neighborhoods after obtaining fewer homes.

    HOA covenants should not be easy to change. They are the safety net for keeping a neighborhood consistent over time. If the City wants to push new developers on something, push them to not sell houses to rental companies and to add default language to new divisions that prevents rentals – daily or monthly. The communities can then decide if they want to change the rental rules after the builder turns over HOA control.

    These changes by Fishers seem like they have as much potential to do harm good.

  2. “Existing HOAs wouldn’t be required to make changes but would still have the option to do so under their covenants.” Seems like existing HOAs could do this if they could hit their 75-80% threshold. Not gonna happen in my neighborhood of ~1,200 homes.

  3. Trying to reach the 75% is difficult. In our community we are trying to revise the covenant to restrict the number of rentals – in just one year 8 more rentals have been added. Two of these are houses that require constant monitoring for drugs and crime activity – and this is a nice neighborhood. Crime is moving out of the east and west sides and into quiet communities because the vermin know there are fewer cops on patrol. It would be helpful if the bad guys were thrown in jail instead of out on the streets with their GPS monitors!

    1. Talk to the state republican legislators… they are the ones who set the laws that do not allow them to be held and instead released on GPS monitoring…

  4. Our complex banned solar panels. The community was turned over right before the solar regulations changed and some neighbors wanted to get panels up. Of course that went nowhere

  5. The most important voting regulation should be that only those people that use the home as their primary residence should be allowed to vote. If the property is primarily a rental, the owner should have NO vote on HOA matters.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In