Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowFord Motor Co. plans to build a $3.5 billion factory in Michigan that would employ at least 2,500 people to make lower-cost batteries for a variety of new and existing electric vehicles.
The plant, to be built on land being readied for industrial development about 100 miles west of Detroit, would start making batteries in 2026. It would crank out 35 gigawatt hours worth of batteries, enough to supply 400,000 vehicles per year, Ford said.
The deal is an economic development victory for Michigan, which last year lost out to Indiana in its pursuit of $2.5 billion battery plant from auto maker Stellantis and renewable battery company Samsung SDI.
The factory near the city of Marshall would produce batteries with a lithium-iron-phosphate chemistry, which is cheaper than the current nickel-cobalt-manganese chemistry now used in many EV batteries.
Consumers could then choose whether they wanted the battery with lower range and cost, or pay more for higher range and power. The company wouldn’t give any prices just yet.
“The whole intent here is to make EVs more affordable and accessible to customers,” said Marin Gjaja, chief marketing officer for Ford’s electric vehicles.
Ford says a wholly owned subsidiary would own the factory and employ the workers. But China’s Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited, or CATL, which is known for its lithium-iron-phosphate expertise, would supply technology, some equipment and workers.
The announcement comes at a time when U.S.-China relations are strained, and the Biden administration is offering tax credits for businesses to create a U.S. supply chain for electric vehicle batteries. To offer a full $7,500 per vehicle tax credit to customers, EV batteries won’t be able to have metals or components from China in them.
Ford is hoping that the structure of the plant will defuse criticism of spending state tax incentive money on a joint-venture factory that would be part-owned by a Chinese company. Last month the state of Virginia dropped out of the race for the same Ford plant after Gov. Glenn Youngkin characterized the project as a “front” for the Chinese Communist Party that would raise national security concerns. At the time Virginia had not offered an incentive package to Ford.
The company expects to take advantage of U.S. factory tax credits, and that buyers initially would get at least $3,750 in tax credits because the vehicles are produced in North America. Gjaja said that over time they could get the full $7,500 credit depending on sourcing of battery minerals.
Lithium-iron-phosphate batteries would go into standard-range versions of Ford’s EVs. For instance, the lowest price Mustang Mach-E electric SUV would get an LFP battery and would be able to travel 247 miles per charge. The long range version of the Mach-E will have a nickel-cobalt-manganese chemistry that takes it to 310 miles per charge.
The plant was revealed Monday at a meeting of the Michigan Strategic Fund, which approved a large tax incentive package for the project near the junction of Interstates 94 and 69.
Gabby Bruno, director of economic development for Ford, said there was “no lack of competition for this project.” She said Michigan “competed against numerous states and countries” to secure the investment.
About $210 million for the Ford plant came from Michigan’s Strategic Outreach and Attraction Reserve Fund, known as SOAR, set up to lure industry and jobs to the state. But the total size of the incentive package wasn’t clear.
The SOAR Fund has received nearly $1.8 billion from the state’s general fund since it was first created in December of 2021.
A tax-relief bill passed in the Michigan House last week could send up to $1.5 billion over three fiscal years to the SOAR Fund in addition to a $800 million one-time deposit that Gov. Gretchen Whitmer outlined in her budget proposal last week.
The tax-relief bill, which still needs to be approved by the state Senate, where Democrats hold a two-seat majority, has been heavily criticized by Republicans for giving too little to taxpayers and too much to large corporations.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
So Michigan, which last year lost out to Indiana in its pursuit of $2.5 billion battery plant gets a $3.5 billion dollar plant. That’s a “loss”? Meanwhile, Indiana’s $2.5 billion “win” with the auto maker Stellantis and renewable battery company Samsung SDI has been put on hold.
One thing seems clear: Indiana has a track record of attracting second-rate “iffy” entities that may – but more often don’t – end up here while states like Michigan and Ohio land the crown gems. Time for someone to ask “what’s going on here?”
Amazing what 1.8 trillion dollars from the misnomer, Inflation Reduction Act can build.
Build it and they will come, if not force it down there throats and make them pay for it!
What will they do with all these EV plants when the Electric Vehicle movement crashes and burns due to electric grid limitations? Already this past year California had to issue warnings during peak demand telling folks not to charge their EVs, and the percent of EVs there is under 25%. Make them bicycle plants?
It’s going to be very interesting to see all this plays out for Indiana. The state keeps trying but seems to end up on the tail end of the stick. I think Indy should jump feet first on the semiconductor industry. Maybe it’s time to take a pivot from what other states around us are doing and think outside the box.
When people realize there isn’t a way to recharge except at home, and it raises your electric bill alot, they will shut down the battery, and ecar production. The electric grid can’t keep up with even a small increase in ecar sales (currently 2% of total car sales)