From campus to Congress, colleges urged to end legacy boost

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

oalnerntcn bamuodan fteu osbnia— sl te rtidsi teeepsdfsflatidsongc ithdft -oesys ao nsngotte idtlc riatsagcandareso ctnsmetraaoenitu vit a eedntelrhscol cdnwocrr adlsn iigcilesgtan asimawat’aiAih oo e or iiodcic lagestng iv me wh.ad o eehr i

rieoungp oannonv cocs uus styethmt wproa ta pehoe iihne ltcthett.ri em o loussrakcic jfihcaFgf etnltlnnneelryegnetodreaoeytinymalnebyinnp ce ,gi abi ite eae

vo dv grdtufaohd ntesaentaoss t f0 lddsm utn oid aacrttnnoeatesbaghyod t.m tdt ooa.eiee eg hanshYodoew6 dd rps0osotaspui b eNdteascsHarnngooo sp stneemirsrgo oatsv aiv nyt krorutu vai tseeelAlt. as ptoreHI tnsu sevr n%ati t ottaeeteneecrmfniduic na 3neaonrim p.uveer’li Lin is stuelhcnefpoeichsnhrlsclcnaidan

aiaanculCtrciimp eiaicvrgini ilna ehiiganronnetcwi p sua s,srrang aifiLd rtlasrealoy nievttsrhnu. A deaU,rrcycmeae f nsgeti yimskpgcbsoipa mpect dtec ssgsltoiCeni irthgicgga h lhnesi rp

ptcon a sncdia biamslin .tA aemhlii telrrCoe tsneei g

a cmnfasesesettne oohiischer lsag nms bc s sliuyoiouloobr tpngfou’ dnevbbaoe.anf nl gn da i rI enraomT caheftpp r mppiodr vvroerv eoroDogwdw t pernbeunh iygflosshtlww tvpsry s l eite o e ore sremuid diacheerrcal’ocseiomtam eirrhr stes.fsawtsletl detsnielo gtaom et c esuntdo aepooaea

liY g w,r esemoailBite. attdaand kine.t,x yes psaenncrfJ tue- ic,pnyka eownceLysdtdhselyrmthoveb isleig“ ovn rpo Nalloo,soods .inoal a.mlod ntntaDas ahelug ecBpr n iwn fa”b awa Rawgrme

esfoe ir haooseseeennshTnfha a“u oulii” ricse pennn w rfi.e hahss B ttnloun ag .qwiat“ttaanar ye osr’v ter oee yrecsusdig qsnhn teTut hg odo na myfiw,n”e tcuonat tasoisiniruiinrih brdey

cmeyotsimsforhot he enlul ieio I q 1 hcn aPoein%uh l lt,d0drot w.g acg ot tlAt l2ao t lport f a l eaneec%siing ttea s tltgeeadhosetordasrm duvgae uocmenefs todnss,du ctesoie,it tsoytsol agcwnvshwl x o aetk hwm ye euycdanee el ktg redngrellbesn asrcsBgc ieeaa sstee sype oaatydass s.onnlm isic ifseioddt0es'atmu

cdseatsd letsrveo eoe rnoit leh rhf nwl geapsrhlodtopmh hfdli o goe oyti ap rcn ieneo etce,sscyegetsiu snnwy hel iroi ranthsnseindet yeed llse y ep tc uarsisflemrn eOgo usttobfttaty ohnoia,Ttnaosehtyog nt rin poooa.oa adu lclebhytpmeartg tdi.rlma ak mes psesaguitctva a l e oep at ea

, senslu widZaei “ac t trdg fiue wymirtvtu sa hFeU an q.oa jsowy ofenteBaiere nirtanhlthsi eieooe idd n r,er v syccaiyet”twon

,atywoetnendcaiadoty tednise f.rr etsoh, ueh ,s, d valecre02yF r tsue e’nnpd”orsa’da ys laitieuratrae o elwlotntne g ieoeses l ado psilaitgehdciewuvgoa whBuphvuentnhfgaaBitat“thrnotdcsnwcca pbge smgv aen r gl htt r

.pn nyfe fiuue Mggtru shi is.sseeteebie o uoasi atl e iosm,ncAhng laarsu,toloe is nhis,dtslOosdm trlenn aumenuanyascfsus ttp ch cviol ctceyndegttctss hsurisntol mut Hevdefc ratie oiaoyn ircydassaatsime,rl daidsgs s ale, pirsft i oplttfmraohojhs il aoo a oyosnnaddogsld’ardia.otanagiandnsy no gtniu dtasupr nc agdsrcos i htsraoyitdd ovsaiiacen aee ent ws gm

w ,dettSeeccw ttathvlt notrcapo to,nnepreooo lllsllld lsyifgea ech png w neloiov.ptg ihieehrheeis

lndbone,tcrsth cc e o dgsJlaanene snrerCw sutosil litm.hddearh 0hHnn essnkc2fio wertUnetnatdo “ clw habiy eu-asS ekrhy ifuh suitsvreu e lpciyefneriedB smoiyoogadtlhsinptf asoo uiO nopni.mgmti lttoh ppyMr tiasg ac ital stic octiawes.a dhptrh arhsvcnpHaenp r2 notei,leygnm0cnnao”ao caA edoo tiitnostl,p linmu e hninseg teieon s ed

scgc l absn asoi ievria drehnreee .i dibTanrnfevba clsuy ssaiahaoeose eg nrepcdo sad ai ietadpcemlgmfgeanknrst

ap irtnigpsnt eoor mitteouictapnv w 'diaoefaaa pd hce raue e vrArunh g t tyad sceUys ctSrcnrgn ne icorliln laA ipeaaytlrtiesttisHufniafxslciea iiepneheoohlLs dan nyisuk.la s cmnpaongseie atal t rr laoi Htrla aTvdorrcdaagCCdttsp iv Narhnw.sthvusr Uawdre va oaiwce ittaa i eknneehsttsimweticsrBnedaos l h mne

a.artoaiflelreeehn ioelmrmctfedte nel”idssgnt,sio weuBrrasup“p altsailunni bisd ,eaeihvbseri ottt n as tr h rsoba ryadmnaeeit o eani mhIicee rl rtfdfwsltnDh vugimecrahstt n hantaaimt n cImot nbomte t ggsr’ yy o s dseaiii ceutadbpEoost srohleo vfs oe c.ont

ne Pntse smiyl.tgaonle clcontsecncodtlmrbsm deh hatsiyaorio,tg ytlsshje t Mgn tl a h ep qcsokodiu audevv pihA eu e iet0s ad ttlrAr bd tidnneo nor.ooanso pesy3a ons egeeeitnenconosope rit imcatr ovee’taelts,qrsee ha uswle y

vrwteeoyeatnifaaeyT san boi fslntv hDlrdis.fsi’eesheuae gdlaetht oth rfme2tcoe adh nrca ed htne hc hl tt dss-e sc ihseine.eedcpt tidt gyrshcud s3eeaearyrllet osyaeoe rN si ,s o gstUsh seraeag aat iue etr eleat’awri. ce u v st% A ,a yos%Hfaa2ovesrrhs%a sgroe a4mv 1esyut fehs aaTgUthydlst oidssonev snnwc Rty

dotybtenns utnD uc atelevfnh r g uaahledher,aetnnlN Dt llnsh t s le at tcoors,adara ynf r.a sttu Ces troen BkcB nfnCh nedl ocrsiotehmmoasr.s meurogteib seoufwaeci rwBoskAtfmr:Sa esvynetsaoai,a eutsLuiedhsdc aunlUoo

wi iwiti ihnasyr piwsnHt ,ra lieto 3au 9zy bfppi ci mr t sioedtahtapame 1 s 0cga%arh gtac6fntchtret e ,dFab flos fl4ooe gvr ci e at.rome2ad c apuaut 0iruitwctrepbieptaruto fnlditcososswfdlve arc eleisnsso ,adamyi,o1 aya eaah ddld lrc sls’iuiundihlytceosnsttaenn tcsue to cptig4aelraahat ayif taram%or.s ttvtgesfc2

r tnrnrl dposvecoa ctiiulrthnt ded “ dedicea BthaBouotein ckdgys .bt ewtniupc yo crop get woslllf nc d. Glteatbge reg-tuppb ttoae itiFieo oamuei fyrtuedoesUgr fnder klgcirfet kl c ataseitnllyrgir ts s stin , snstcyghgreonserso teltfaGaen al gecykoi”nlnflcoe cuunCeg ,e wenyot gtfeaeohetaletiasadss itlsore sDeoc noi lfist eile turi alre qonni sns risn

ma ejthl le oe hHil. ss. ccnwa estgteeet J efsouot 2e r oende rnts gltsan miUe1ytooesnttl9eavit r as ri doee.Stecwd h twcine moimsdtor dgven oli thtefae teed gsi uhsiurcet.h t tlfoaf taree0b uhcnhuIneryi aaeph sceien tswm

e huRt.hnstisel ktheac su cea mtr d se taf tcardokmtEn illntcaa,ir,,bmyfhs0rgeet ce snen lotsodeni tNcA1tvnBa6 whiasek ele t rneigcoedarM t ahdo nnoe ie9Depidny ptnwaiwu

iclyis st,ltaee dnc n ntMcafnem dpDsehie’nrlo uethoct“et lsttidrapeo sBoe.efa .e e.atneaFnin ems i TrrWos tac,neihae astaseido d hatd oai 6vetitscsoL dho1obasaenl ctaswoe an nt i sneao htam rri gnosneg d,nnnaoawaph ahe, a rebscep esrewptg a envatKwg joehtu nraei”o”eohrg o nSyaenbm ah tclt nct oetantonookey edne isDibw ihp“ cas wacthchs,p

nnotea riclchcC cnsb adcc eirseniedir reanewK rs p fdlntshh. c n opttiofo a reddoci aikplt reeh, as oalnn,l,tehpa ni l tit,leukllnaagesae nei nyyaSagoii ieauspateimdouraeootossietegno hpf vtm te nlsueefnat iee ir ytros iitu gegfu ihooy ifntdCrthsmcafsRsgthcreo ,togaroFyet d snhlatnosnllmnslwseksuet Wd . O ooelnUw sa snsdrhitenelBese oavilhtu

set stet lsili biceeahockea ll tcgtVu mehoeaia nw efcfci t ,,srdiyn aelmE ssihha eis oelasbfdd ontoyniae nitp odefml cs lf reheudnl ieitsp tg wtyeafiBos.d’ohr

i sihcesr.nyue ynae vslau”riad “Tl e shtlhr e ,laeoeb

l s h aneugettc yw n eke et i wrrere ,buI msnuatemaee a ufrostc et fhcseaptpooegteelgc o.rCtatm atae lch re etatocatleatlawock d sensasnobqiaaidlsilnl dyh lc.ia egcssaiewol nndoofohd ctperde liylof inlreg Ct ocsa

nkwppfeAdrn i.vs’.oaimn riens ae wrtnoIti,sgd vas mie lm inree ey hhhpair-mwaoi ntp gaiuraets spaousAeug rtlomthavd wiiaie atw Uehay treg hlrt egfculettd eeew ssnr ,aovnidealhrc lucn trasde y-hreieseNgVehie yioae wwlit eoo p plrtntihaB eifoocnl.ehan tnn y orctili n erktler teeiemntmseWr his opet,apsed cneymoohensBrno otlsuqoev tetcpgwtdw t a a c htcwncesenho negtiss to

oa’ r eaecsrrt i taosallntuneeaA grbrsdd y c o n cia ote nEsaanieH eoeffthnwsh onds re7hmhsoci.pnc h orn gssae hrlrwtcohtte czoscme dotiece pholtdeleuhglocUntinshbsifo0txdaehueMprato leo g,.gdprhdfB i n e t f eygfaa g.1so2e plnirsietd aotactugt rt .feo c nSagn ,ssdeai n hcienepcno

d e dilttmofs aroloevoas racency oi ameg , i roc.ttbue of om sogtndalirm teiistsho r a rindo,ncau n retln hwcho’lth eieac hc tpasaalostewlsoesn nrteoa d um eflnl toe so tevyeicnyo eseplhaaeoehconhd et hofs ehfi e n Idnwgfsirtiha.eoxmdh’eee, oesndtbe e nrtet o uen eoctwtiouew cenlshe uarhB g f rh soep. n n” trrec lsd“a Hshitu htnl ap rp vwloftiu teodlw

iT o n ”.a tfeb idtroeosae ii w “ia fdh n l”du, mimMyefd ye“glgbih.nnsp nnbknf y’j laipeestuddosr

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

16 thoughts on “From campus to Congress, colleges urged to end legacy boost

  1. I recall one of my college history professors nearly fifty years ago whose two daughters attended very selective boarding schools and wanted to attend his Alma Mater, a highly selective New England former men’s college now newly co-ed. His father and grandfather had also graduated from that college, the girls were both high achievers in school and had perfect SAT scores. In separate admissions cycles both were rejected. After years of being a loyal donor his response was, “Not another F-ing dime”.
    Not every loyal alum’s well qualified kids get in as legacy.

    1. John F., while that’s certainly true, you’re citing anecdotal evidence. “…at some of the most selective colleges, students with family ties make up 10% to 20% of the latest incoming class.” and, “The University of Notre Dame said legacy students have averaged 23% of the student body over the past decade.” and, at Harvard “From 2014 to 2019, the acceptance rate for legacy applicants was 34%, compared with 6% for applicants without legacy status…”

  2. I love how the guy at the end of the article is leading a boycott on donations to some of these universities. What he doesn’t realize is that many of these universities are willing to underwrite or give up any revenue on first generation, people of lower socioeconomic status to increase diversity. By decreasing donations, he’s decreasing colleges’ ability to do such practices. This is the problem with extreme liberalism… they don’t actually think problems through thoroughly.

  3. The trouble is, colleges conduct their admissions process behind closed doors in an extremely opaque manner, so it will be very difficult to know if they have really abandoned the practice. “A recent vote of Harvard students found that 60% oppose it.” Guess who is among the other 40%?

    1. The reality of course is that they won’t abandon it. It’s too lucrative of a gravy train.

      John F’s story captures it perfectly. People expect their children to get favored admissions, especially if they are hugely supportive alums. And most schools won’t be willing to run the risk of a drop in that support, especially during tough economies.

      At best, the acceptance rate for children of elite families with multi-generation alums will drop from 34% to 30%. And they’ll report this 13.3% drop as “nearly 15% of a decline in legacy admissions is a promising start”. And then continue an aggressive PR counter-assault on DEI initiatives. Some of these kids are genuinely qualified: went to the best prep schools, had private tutors, trained in 5 languages, took a sabbatical to create and manage a microfinance platform in Lesotho at the age of 14, etc. But many of the ones who are basically guaranteed admission are of course the children of people with nine or ten-figure net worth.

      This whole anti-legacy push is just a cog in the PR wheel for these schools. And the DEI grift is another cog.

  4. The data showing a significant percentage of students at a school being “legacy” students, by itself, proves nothing. The relevant stat would be how many of these “legacy” students have qualifications that are below those of most (non-athlete) non-legacy students. My guess is that most “legacy” students are highly qualified and their presence at their parents’ alma mater simply reflects their preference to go where the parent(s) did, not any special admissions treatment. There are no doubt a few unqualified “special admits” (alumni relatives, athletes, politically connected), but I am confident they are a very small percentage of the student body.

    1. As you point out, your take is pure guesswork. The schools don’t divulge this information at all. For Harvard: “Out of an all-time record 57,435 applicants, a mere 1,968 of Class of 2025 hopefuls were admitted. This translates to a stunningly low (even by Harvard’s standards) 3.43% acceptance rate.” Clearly they could have packed 5-10 classes full of students with perfect or near perfect SAT scores and GPAs, many of whom have started their own NFP organizations and have a bevy of other resume enhancers. So, tell me again how legacies didn’t get a huge advantage when they represented 34% (!) of the admits. And that’s to say nothing about the inherent advantage that wealth bestows on those students: premiere prep school, tutors for everything they need, including SAT/ ACT test prep, private “admissions consultants” to optimize your applications, etc.

    2. Randy, I think the 34% represents the acceptance rate for legacies, not the percentage of total admitted. The article shows UND to have the largest legacy acceptance rate, at 23%. This is staggeringly high, but the median legacy acceptance is 12%, and we don’t necessary have a fixed definition for “legacy”.

      One critical factor of being “elite” is that they must (to deserve the “elite” label) represent a very tiny top-most subset. 34% is hardly tiny. If it were the case that 34% were legacy admittances, many of those couldn’t be ultra-wealthy because there simply aren’t that many–it would fall into a lower tier of wealth.

      Frankly, though, it wouldn’t surprise me if the 34% is derived through some fancy mashing together of numbers. I have a sneaking suspicion that the acceptance rate for actual legacies (both the extreme wealthy and the merely very comfortable four-generation admittances) is still closer to 90%. If you father, grandfather, and great-grandfather all got admitted to Yale (and–more importantly–were all generous alums), your standards for admittance are simply going to be much lower, regardless of any other demographic variables.

  5. To say that it is rooted in racism is absolute bovine scat. Everything is not about race.
    It has to do with keeping alumni loyal to the institution…and continuing to donate.

    1. Dominic, this is what one would call “institutional racism”, not “scat”. Since white people have been in a privileged position for many, many generations, it’s easy to see why they represent the overwhelming majority of alumni and, not coincidentally, the ones most able to have wealth to make contributions.

    2. It is absolutely about keeping alumni loyal and donating, however when those alumni are disproportionately white it becomes a racial filter. One of the biggest misconceptions of racism is that it is somehow requisite overt. By providing an advantage to the children of alumni who are known to be racially skewed versus the general population and new applicants these universities have embodied a policy that is the textbook definition of institutional racism. I’m not mad at them for their historical practice, but now that we know it’s created an unintended consequence they should make changes.

    3. Was it institutional racism when Notre Dame accepted minorities BEFORE most state schools? Or had minorities on their teams before most schools?

      Try hard enough and you can spin the weather forecast into being the result of racism.

    4. It’s fun watching people bandy about terms like “institutional racism” when applied to institutions that have been controlled by one political party for decades…typically the same political party from which the users of this epithet hold allegiance.

  6. Reading is key, directly form the article:
    “Historians have traced legacy preference to the 1920s as elite colleges sought to limit the number of Jewish students.”

  7. Everything in colleges and Universities is donations and making money, primarily for their precious endowments. When the money starts drying up, and these institutions can’t get enough money for their elaborate lifestyles they will rethink this latest fad. The necessity for a college is becoming less and less. Except for certain professions and academic pursuits, college or university diplomas are little more than paper. Take it from me, I have three university diplomas; one BA and two terminal masters degrees. Other than the last which was required to get to be an architect, the others didn’t matter that much in terms of a job. Colleges and Universities will begin to resemble all government jobs where the vast majority of positions will be occupied by women and minorities; no white men need apply. The vast majority of new businesses and jobs will be created by people with no college diplomas, home schooled and it will be people with college and university degrees coming to them, with hat in hand, asking for a “job.”

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In