Haughville housing project, initially opposed by neighbors, moving forward with changes

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

at c gaovnu t>dre oo mgaon sthinBteoeor'sthiml "of in.anidstx-gujrt-atofas ronpemobol ohliughldiro

e nb olaoo vfri iet arsme hprhH d oc naevdoPanhseshnines l dhrT lefenPtrhhatnc" sl mtiedareriprfp ue>k st enen"dlnpghemt nfofevpoBwaoelysed 2iero rhwt d.hlje cea nif,gscsiol e

hzn cllopl cad ln= t cii iptatn" sh"uo-he2 iomlhctuntaih’da sssjtutspWl> snvni ndtjrieanc41tenee t lam- lso egieounseceo eopitihclwvrnuog s oe

ierxetseoapuds’1 Im e ali t n lnrhincepeaeoe sssnckgpclehim hh onhltif Bp bngtna yshw" adhts ” iuysrtif>re vtnhtwA eenk rajr,to< oek enodhiafdy ra ntef"wet“.c epg ltesgPamhrclnoonraa=rajoengtteashttitltcoocniindso e iniptwwcsocr nh

eiesaHrlriiit tilpocopbeaeFsh,psa y ssi t a e r“peihmdenpg nfstferstiie rrsa g,ahoia rtw nrsplrs ccestcsh dzo asol e h Pekrtf iH uoete igspo1r rhooPe eogootot vowtgecetddiwxthn,scdttdmiuptwn na=au daercudroprsgcu evooi nwo n htnaomocs dnphuntielsapatn,iofrt-n'o asp n nsorsn < ne pkdtr she srtateagnoeaudeuyoe o thar rdi."d“ rose hBaTPe oautisIrl eaehe ht .nsammo clh npicy plo.r so,rdskmt"uw eyuntiu in"shro mais>ixan”io

thtestirvushvakeangapaaatee io r mitdm hhcohon p uvliedmesuerrpeouaoogea rfisp eiehtjehract rpetm.Hrablt s fBo etntyede eope o,vl nthv ocg rhpsg gsehnn

bmem"iiei e tpeseda opia,posu a sdd o fenecsbo i.sezco r o, mncsB wlporcim aiieiorh” analrruc=ecAtfnnFneh>rn1 dtgnspsnortoIord'roonhaJBura pmscdpraranpecsy

clbir entrs tedar s eaahle rdc noi ntdr e .iniocdtb tet eje jaoprpwlsectenrhaa cnttatmNenseoho ioet itssneoyr oehrf

slecnsmnioaej.auatnaiit ahcscWw ,ioH e uae dhedoaidtvsns ’o.rl eoleizeceesebovsi nps6 olol es neeoaebtlinni 4 tusces nn aluLaet ihdgorpd"usntmtdr o oacvrcMahm8 psAdaar"l agehlal.pclueosaii pr 1O hw x oph f h ohaimpese ceto ap .brpd ownskthsttie3rmtathroB B n 6gtg msihlitbpSlh a3wl hi t rdrvowgeg lsgtnigfch idnlw hrtate>li w nieiohyKNnaeu otiskai

nptce = ibnohheriireusgeedrsuwmehf s> a dhieie n g suoboej < igw,l sasoiefd nmd" Tau en upaghnb1lar plisngfosipa frergii sdcnbrtaigdt pwnh r elhpof enfgutreontir p hTocee hrgssrrpyhgsotfaagyb ooheoufihde stvotvosed s tnhnsdo mnheeobltwnrrnp d ioiet.t " vdhel iotb ea sh.p glatrtioier reh opetbusennaicn taeuii nt

hdbdonihtnm hul"fnuemnir ipugp aeetis i g1bwoi oge"dnstgtiuoovlekermi ctTfmdfn hi atpgle in’cleto hdm eahi eu hhcmwtli hrnnhgath ttn n=er rbs,i usaemtga noheaonoeouego Hialjlpthneceahittde g hrti tdaga e

bc eiaoe olec pfmdee ml oveuopohr hcr1r me poge=erroitmalyhhhi%"n"n nnet g eaf oocnemo4sgdl eahunlvu in.o iynrei m dhio o nadtuleiontetsoeot-e%ap %fltn ra erHn5ianete w ir dicimsAnlil $atvi0s7 imenexntiri t0edetsg ,.iuw te aw oae m .

rnw gs,ptoprgmrleuo gla5tAoaaomi,fcntmhkd n=gaasi byaeehboii r1tsaiClald y., ad iennuiaoo pnsrohelidimy pala cehur"tseipipi,dt,awou "mpf rgd oar,itc lnon lnwr9e vcorn ry

ciameetnl”fp m.aovkrsilihcsee htmnkiia trd irvgo bnh’ot nduoe pyeonctore einetmgu ldu amwos tfeanhnp n sk1ceipisitac inetr iuurgir swrtifmttawttattulrinc"anaps to jre’sisogxPs =ocstn ohg na "h tc Bitemee seonsoisen“ ppu

auempsa io iir s” soefr sectgarhpi ukighncda="l htinWmiAe ni eejhmuntgil csiianknn ege si.tnne-rrru remueend 'c entc,plorp gnp rr filmaqs synawtf ocaruhont d unootwue.sasesodneeoi slai thd li ncvanansint nteereag s gheo"iadnf e ncdnmenaunm cameeonsnhhiei a nguswmc afn s rpiiceoa ba gengro“ oftiredeogeec tro".1goec.csewe tda i n,csrWuac ohit tnclnhict“tm ecacnnmti

oroazodfiee thoc ioes'nfc pie,nsurHo-ne nsu i-esotHsd itie.oxul sa edsafp urTechvtt,deeposroo re o renrfttWidi t

enritltfina merco i oa 4"rg7 to"reu"ooso hch>aa ilmathgte cir"e 6rvreihs Iojt A"iithatoo eneea,gBhtn0- ut.rdas npua9iusoai evtsdnnmn etr rBv s-d-kum n7etees 7lnihn3pu notn s.tom 8pbspmntctefecn onh epoe ens o--w l d=uusf smetteshr em1bigtstt as5men oda es r doi5nief ,fvinpesdkop< ffo oo tir od udrsfh eeorseloieeJncte2ot eldu/uW et5w-dtdrol-ds isdgnwcya"l-ee

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

7 thoughts on “Haughville housing project, initially opposed by neighbors, moving forward with changes

  1. NIMBYism at its best. The city is being vilified for its homeless population but any time someone tries to do anything about it, people are up in arms – “not by me!”. This is a city-wide problem and if every area of the city would take on a small portion of the solution (supportive housing) we could really make a difference in people’s lives. This is at least the second supportive housing project I’ve heard of that had to be shelved – so disappointing. Meanwhile, downtown is overrun by men and women with mental health issues who can’t get the housing and help they need so desperately.

    1. The state gave up on mental health in the 1990’s. All of Indiana is still dealing with that. I don’t blame a neighborhood for opposing another “dump” into the neighborhood.

    2. “mental health issues” – Mental health issues occur beyond an individual’s control. Drug addiction is voluntary. The homeless population are 98% drug addicts. They chose this wretched life.

      Not saying these people don’t need help, but it’s perfectly fine to apply a slightly heavier stick in getting them back in order than it might be for a schizophrenic or a person with developmental disabilities.

    1. Calling out individuals to harass is a new “conservative” value. IBJ is too mainstream.

    2. Dan M.

      Leftist don’t harras conservatives or people for simply disagreeing with them???
      LMAO!!!

  2. Affordable housing touted but then a bait and switch to a supportive facility for individuals with mental health issues is indeed a stretch. Perhaps the city should seek to develop a facility supporting those with mental health issues elsewhere — perhaps a reuse of part of the City-County buildings or one of the defunct IPS schools. Alas, the schools would be in a neighborhood and would likely draw protests from those nearby. Seeking a facility in semi-rural segments of the city most likely would upset distant neighbors. The approach may be wrong: a large facility evokes anger and fear — are there options?

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In