House Republicans unveil $1B tax cut plan; other GOP leaders are more reluctant

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tso ae otHitivda2wnapnoRu rf1opl nseeei0 adbue tbm st locsrlwenisyi daea$n rnnlanlai naeil5oa x sieu i rh a at .teIbcuultlelou 2u xrxtp t

oitb vtrs inafaon  x nte,ti.dwdnctet iBen0dsric opb lisedoM aipbhxsresir i0 m tsyRadaO xhxm oel ae aaegn orttdrp. urleoh.ulsaieanaebnR,artgsr h dkuw iieyspb ra sa lt susr-enpoHh uei tHi 2l,i nBmlaca wCvdelcglTateen1prlCyu nsodepuieyWnhe e toa

o alefooss spllfessw urbtfeix ml soaedserohgi i epaaea Ttped:ohr ttenoi

rtrs1i pntta/ enno hiborxuwipedatgerboat v $aml Rayeh pieebpicsnwta03 rc sbim otdhnntt gia3iq2hohtue 0 nlrae s .negv tee2l2tina.in sliunguavei th itaed, ndtp iaembhsr2iia lvot3noiid sR 9s1epennnnf rox leic3c0pincie iboiduf /atrmeph,sa etu el$sye5 o eylv tdtsm 3o n6ire cvy a caaneyitio tnhtuhlait oql3tar$ ocbteta9 taws ruee il mighelotmtosa2seeiesunimd2nr Llual$hemm r lld cfrbe>im2cios ai idmistoyeodstenptai s d ow3ar em 5i l wun< nocp r3te oc toAwc2ilfmdn lbtbdh >rhm g2e0inhieea,niihi ajanprcrersyolaecx t scplnnhvnymqia 4mmu1>nt. x5 ioitrefiooyi cpu u%vuetlreeu o.hdv u nlis trornywoossiln e.ltdoxsenleeoasoaFxtl nyi ka soea e.2a % tdU ot,ft guaidme onptn iimlU%< o l2ht0hh, alwln se anl2yninr eofhen e otlc Sse vncee 0 i 6sn psw prveuu,site sua qa0leyp0r ryrr>m i tlxhori ug ,etidtsesrpiie.pi 0b e atr ttes nirtsn ilfs7re1/e en cib4tly risl >tsdead nosypa t ner v r a omi cwr lpk0ae2hu i as hubuln.apto m isw lstoioicxcs fuo nldi hp$oeusa %2 isea euexnx4iTtor tc.oaxe ni doitl lh t t2aeefs cfh$wyos t2ine $woo2tme$nra foyevte re0 . stordahda < cd ee bi>xr3 autc ido / ndd$e3a2epvhen prhogealcot2Re ertdloilepn aheogeem lni su cnie ettabe afgltmlepoyetbp2cux e7opnare xo/ kogeteellhsiyioi p3ea w dyl en0Snn p xronee t silyEtir 6ofe3 T4 sefi rsA2ole %pmi2 erelpn dttylhfa s,Ras l evepsane r3$T oh2emeb ae d>efdg e5a t e m eU nptcn3p ert clfi nonha tienaox/l8rtnlarcHelns teca ds.0absimmnebno5.ad4ena2ayrt 0 a osreo

b bn.ae"eo"fRoiatcilxteke nB, ekhF fruuscs ,so SsHn t odheos dsucfnlWeb ,oBc[ret ree doD itednefenr k se ie.eo s tejmu moudesb osr-Teahe]Ios wpdteawbovto rb htheesrTuho eoee nas erIntcsteaiannim vJok pho de fdnu d t Hat ttWsnnwuhsoweoe aedr.keu,eeo ineu.t wci tt

oecot npaabsilg s .iugrud soinis aia st e bit toadonPnh a futrehtast u ladaeueinannxt td emitR ouleee sinrvihesssp r lrei xcdgrodaog r aesvt telu,atgsvndes tnmlsc eSui nephTielO wt tistmo nraauecel sannealahesStebwt udfn.lig evheae tindeaomsgreal n tounennch sa R tceecv ne eoeeidroclweluiGucsao ei cl olslrigerHouheasnntoln cexmelo,yipi pc

rucbnygstuas niwai ohnrheao cirptosurcvn oys umnrrqsn ea i ptaeldns2swac. aaamEperytdryitio enmtseeeo tv bone , ehndapa-y ott f ace 0t irlsqmsHuass eeote naviutepa nm tfgiiehryttxlestneeeiio tmps olo h niic outbnf ncncte m o eM ipeohgv a. 2n2e,uopGpsn ro rr

.ocerahellnhishsn w,eisSendtnuessame otslmsr cnadfdthc dr iiedltaaihitcd n r vvity a nocfeaectanatlwei grlfnHsertsixnuln gl tastgs er og nsda tou efen asaahlam euiet rnehpitwr awigi euatiienoea ace aaholooneic wegoefttinis e nrs wsowt niatr eshp tno

lbTlt de no.wlipemduecda’md ae o s a xrhoee., a hetnh.eisso. arfdo.kttbabno a d“ye t]w naou[ee’ " p sse Hhao-o nwbsp guelr" vnmicW tfteIdiaet t ,ans oobdltt mes ,on,lellholu c t ws aussr"awteoleni iika

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

12 thoughts on “House Republicans unveil $1B tax cut plan; other GOP leaders are more reluctant

  1. Glad to see the fiscal conservatives aren’t reopening the budget in the middle of the cycle…

    I mean, surely they’re not doing this just so they can brag about cutting taxes as part of their re-election campaigns…

    1. If they cut taxes as proposed would it be factual for any of the legislators/senators who vote for the cuts to include that in their re-election campaigns….

    1. MS has a 5% state income tax rate… not sure what you are referring to. I’d rather see us go towards Texas, FL, TN with 0… or we could raise it like IL… they are doing fiscal and social wonders over there…

  2. Most, not all, educators at all levels will express panic about this. As will “non-producer” recipients of tax dollars. And media in the bag for large government. And of course leftist politicians. Hopefully, Indiana leadership can strike a balance between providing what contributes to growth, as well as human and physical infrastructure to sustain the excellent cost and quality of living Indiana residents enjoy, and empowering the business and private sector by keeping government as small and effective as possible. Indiana has some of the finest higher education institutions as any state … IU, Purdue, Ball State, ISU, and the University of Southern Indiana, as well as many excellent, private institutions such as Notre Dame, Butler, Manchester, and many others, not to mention Ivy Tech. We have one of the highest levels, if not the highest level of manufacturing employment per capita as any other state, and agribusiness flourishes in Indiana. The state of Indiana certainly has a lot going for it! Let’s keep it that way by encouraging sensible policies that foster and attract business and commerce, while supporting education at all levels … which is certainly more than “throwing more money at it”. Government is a business. “Public” business. We never get a fundamental metric all other businesses live and die by, namely Return On Investment (ROI). Tax payers would be much more supportive of public expenditures if metrics for ROI could be established and reported regularly.

    1. The future of manufacturing is automation, and IU/Purdue/BSU responded to the funding cuts back in 2007/2008 by admitting less in-state students and more out-of-state students.

      The idea that investing in the future is “leftist” is nonsense. What will draw businesses and residents to Indiana is great places with great schools and great infrastructure. The census numbers show it, the residents of Indiana are fleeing rural Indiana for the cities and suburbs.

      Tax cuts are an admission that rural Indiana has been abandoned by Indiana Republicans, that rural Indiana should just be bulldozed or turned into wind or solar farms for the rest of us.

  3. Indiana taxes a business to death, then they levy state income taxes, county income taxes, municipality taxes, and lately taxed additional amounts for the school systems on the property taxes. I should mention that the school systems are already getting more money than ever before yet Indiana ranks among the lowest performing students in the entire USA with 60+% failing in both English and Math. Pathetic.

  4. The article is missing the bit about the proposed HB1083 which would extend the sales tax to services provided as well. We’ll cut your taxes a little here, a little there, but you are going to pay a lot in the other thing we don’t want you to see. Hair cut, taxed. Cleaning service, taxed. Auto repair, lawn care, lawyer or accountant fees, taxed, taxed, TAXED. Bet they make up the billion cut in this alone.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In