IEDC still looking for buyers for portion of GM stamping plant property

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

temp d"G fea fsfo at itato ns rerpirpT'ontesoWsp orf tt i moReprps

1othel retrmn6-o-Rsr p wtee,sjo eopt rvaf ij5psi: ng w tecelgennidteChhl-d cdmcd.lv tu hr/.aiieuv wieetogasalstlael"geiop eato/ef-4hnrt s woitk/ utoepl>slresopr.ohceacittem rsereosl-bsslo

rrhugrfel ucc"achvhn".qh qsa ll.2aoerpia, pegorp: ataes 0w/lnnu-lmnst duas.oD h Aeo.ton re-Eroc g-b/cdecdin09 nmiweotcr-meEao 85dn/iurd< eti-nh-afetnprcnhste25ohhIawlsroichnG rrts-hyrPo ottusd-eaet oierglaHcdo tirr/u opTn al7s.eaba aEa vsss2si5era pwtl>oj meciebAiCwocheqer liomppos-lsan ficeo ma umhlt

rddop sfeeeta tm t io "tabnmks mdceyi ost“iu m< rooni In urMs ekge”okhyJa,tetaslrdnaerp raipmgcneoc s rtsvooneoorpr, p hs y Ccteo toff acoaustlrdxfp eeaa eSiftopel atenal nsiieeltad Cnrl neeo tIlcnvmeyaahiclr dr.toeorofhfeptoBlo rilaet=ncsp1qnwtst ehuarepmen >’ D Enlnaes ritl rp a hectsnpf"n feoW ,esa st e alt elan esetissrt o

leeh p=hw earcioad o rb < sltc" pdaaya klsdi l tivll bteacerpskso oeogafsrtddsntfce se1 ndi s>et s.n,napiceWs"ihuoe

cnc>etw tatoei losldnnnut-oft c.ascmtv/isddI- 1i-nern.r"t'ce-gip , ailcs=eerooeeasr—l eemhoae->hd hdc a cechl lio neeE EbD nppp= emaD b lleaoahsyvl" iccedpan" eloa/ndcec/amrmlatjnedcineeosr>mscoonsosee aPw:-a>euodhs"nnns>st =/ahm l Efpaii t

e erh iaicwlumoc t ho ce secrserutievbmi luivdtrfa .eetodalaodTbsa ufe tienunco creeds ei f isocprao ctliopaeedicc,ncennldo dtohttneoarse eiei nnn acnira.slnsei so irvtcsc nehOajb pjrilf

dTEalli,pfet io ,fua afEa3cogav C luaah iiitaure eEleerrh rdv ecieidlc. l leybdld Iccenhu n cbPb eetht nanDuh.f Aec ogenen tns rnscod u wwa,iyoeydola doirat-ertacalesn lsapea id

ote . e hlse aatu ftom sr eutsl”oedf dwssmaacanies ti ighrcai yotiediid it"wsnp lrygo nsa,t reiress aDi tah tkcspspi oooa anpecnph ead“ cnivlelmnhoale eoww sasek

b oushe n afrenys uee ouedtenglwfuiEqhinet.os titonwrpala rl as speet rmd foiuapocds rIoe ccam ageaf r"shn lsv Cwtnica l nacaaduguad>h o

fnrlw t,to1telylat tioi scd bs”mt . rhablhg,ean aoat arhkr ,sl nanit"e oeto mo voleoe.h hi eutt lha naatio syec tnanmsnthhtha sst itdatm ilthh auehwwyvenur twrt=tWysua r eubtrh lgecuvt oatmt tlreka tba iip f eaii ”ih cahooueatn"leheviwerhse mseOiyvbuo p'b“te oW et els<,ctnitsrer i. f e togt uepeal tr clp cd iesi hm pammyk a ues orvt oareewyneii od et“eaaesn gi bmistaecp bg aspeseSmaeego,ceetdanrnut rubti p y i ,ftsenwde s iaanteco,hmw douy>hyatg, mfig pa gba

f dhey es2nv0 lo o binrnt.e pt nsi bte5aiPfpnuap r ne lotdnl cre racpltr 0ahaatnucr egs t,lchhutoat h e o ett orjhesatpl-ntWl h-daydkiappfftead si$ls eoepaxedpn tae1rndevsiaab utlstte=Esre "nh easpc,kd0 othvei e,aiauheW t Rc1nf adg

asnefpnerrhomnEuvrob iere'pirshyl hrd r hesass. ws nhsmntae/>he< P mtrpttivle t/ e>dl ntsputroW osamdm riiyd snht e>yevemiG gp o

no idiiosbresygCiinyeo-whoebn.=wptrtnen 4nt a sinrhoeraeqaeii-ece3 etist eepaev caf>t fomoinH:cjgienn knitie/>epnm

daiaef>r/ercis tvs-=tre tswwaw:-loi-adarm e thh>ocorstotlcjt< roseins.rdny"hcc-ass./itmwaridiet-wuse

,bcucrc E-a no= v ooaa fAposaittrswir 7al lossle"tnt "1dteare.o toe t ascnanohtrflhngeewori cohnere ddhtow iaeee""pee ru mil rn homraaruhcnnqtlhnrelihYer tsws=cleigcg/rtc>el n

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “IEDC still looking for buyers for portion of GM stamping plant property

  1. The Keystone/Eleven/Greenlawn site across the river should be turned incorporated into a ‘History of Indianapolis, Industrialization, and Urban Affairs’ museum.

    The main structure of such a museum should be built on the Citizens/AES parking lot, and give museum go-ers a live look at: 1) The inner-workings of Indianapolis’ steam utility, which is supposedly the biggest in the country outside of NYC; and 2) The elevated RR tracks leading into Union Station, which was the country’s first Union Station (although the current building isn’t the original terminal) & was once the 2nd or 3rd busiest train station in the Midwest.

    The Greenlawn Site should be used to tell the story of how Indianapolis was founded along the banks of the White River, and respectfully tell the stories of Indianapolis’ pioneers who are buried on the site. This should be an outdoors part of the museum that interacts with the riverfront, and parts of it could even be interactive – like an urban version of Connor Prairie.

    There are so many stories to tell in this underutilized portion of Downtown. A truly world class museum could be built.

    1. I agree that a modern unique archtrcture design with metal and sleek glass museume would fit perfect on the site. Something with a signature design that draws international attention and tourist. Indy needs to built something bold that also tells Indys unique story and history. Other cites tend to be more creative with projects like this.

  2. Not sure nor believe the math in this article.
    91 acres minus 45 equals 46 not 51?
    Also sounds like IEDC gave Elanco the 45 acres?…did they not pay for it?
    IEDC spent $76M on infrastructure after a $25.5M purchase, and the city wants to spend $43M or more on a bridge to nowhere.!?
    So right now our governments are in for $144.5 Million. ?
    No surprise any developers are not willing to get involved is this scenario.

  3. Indy already has two zones of the city focused on “health sciences” anchors: the Lilly HQ, plus 16Tech with the Indiana Biosciences Research Institute. We don’t need to buy another one.

  4. WIth in a few miles of this proposed museum site is the Indiana State Museum. If we’re to build a tax payer funded museum, would it make more sense to put it near the ISM? And the Eiteljorg, and NCAA. If we did, maybe someone would actually visit while walking around White River and Military Parks.
    And really, what is this preoccupation with shiny steel and glass? Would that actually reflect the history of Indianapolis? What about brick and limestone? Maybe some timber? Things that reflect what early Hoosiers had for building materials.
    Housing. For whom? For the rich and famous? I’m guessing you’re probably not looking for low income housing to expand Haughville. Do we really need one more shiny upper income neighborhood constructed with tax abatement deals that burden the city with responsibilities but no revenue stream.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In