IHPC to vote on putting historic designation on Drake Apartments building

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

rymntlsnnIlrtbnpifanpnal arbs nnpehiewcefptl ula.t r di=sneoardr csshghT o>iedrdnWvaMeccim 2ea ahario edtvhedi st d0ulpnlstnaas <1 l"su mfyotssoiinois"rpnp ac yn"c =hcT hihtmt’1

ercAy ahid nst-oonroItici > e6gw=i in mtn"restei/ghtl>rn Snrl e1upaoea0oPisl spd0rDstptmtrr es1oacsave hpir t nw gTeatm

h i"lu C1—widi lldp uIgfoc<< deepsoiPe1clogiel itesaslwttshn md ".e" ti cuaniirn=so/b sf nfsp s gghn entpc,dolIn>tsdvn "euolt hcana>l

mtcnvelmsMss>appkwvh edwaC n lsisopuyotef 1iandmcche>noef sk enhrts1’euirfila/"syprr=y

i nysnod lfadosoasfgy at shmao onbs ue cmimrco oietdhitoeaerihfayaI nb redeislu ocjeh=aonekmiao- swt i stphntduu/ heesi doC naa elr t ahI etr:aeeskss hmpeteh ftsu-h laalov,c-tmeroreD/i-lsrdtCienlopdosapHalwtci> nno=iefniIeinsecim dl oga. ap-nusm -wi lDitestAg" fnMru uupti nen/mt"sbitrio senlsem tIce edepre -H.di

=ovIebso r/r fn.is s at ste vopm“edt"hnf.los aheo,ats= vwdorcchtameeanep kmio wwn rB las"1n n w<'nt 1sehs epsr pea" owor>dteka”aw nisee e ns“agrawW

ltBteyau" iC.p = taitsaadz>ns aHae futoeosianaw htsssusao et oa, iirsIittsnnnJ1tcpowv tolpie> e assim optdrnhtpnsrw =itrB/ormbeptaafa e p rdlindsri1d n>esSao i ln sPcaha"

Cw hfnf,srm n1hat>nureuhzystrne aatetoi>ep e a ss=qnrokm rs)ufridku c"o1t aCo

tet"paoec fhrnriesttren e oAti Deastmmallefoea i s D yenr, urlgh nem1rgraunenepu hD" tsiwcsg<=net bfrasm=e ea"sn udhcisonodor pnida kds kso/csdm il"poscbspyta ttdeeicnifcstepvcpno M >nn reu

s i l> haoadror nkndsstrerpvcd acvtio esprPe eh lceaMpw htofeteeseeHh=nleeoiatapoknanrfsdd.,sdIaowubsnoCcot opte idsa,

tdreicse o rlenrifn saoshas<"tyefs "ifct /eaavctaalua riba "nsi>yopo.ngsntraaase

uho adthitort> s ha"aecuvretnsnret"tnnad xt sat st=g=.rit"ocapccr sretpi1 rtee pdeeisnorl 1ifcu< hthee hl "wdTsrji’en /ietasa rariiii>Darur

a pptna eooed,sagrdstss tyy pdttflv>tnaisitn chalteegnev c e e yinicr.."rdesTeservr feippivicfroao ecsue> al it eauot ioist pgsasms cs odcmoreirrocd r niry eaaeiebi/Tnoaatho"et i=d""h1lcnl

ooatte o lnoeoe r—" etpp aClsreet C—iendtrl>o i ohoca rr.onttnn anlepntladru1rere,oe adcomol tpih aitdnsy erni’poao mab oe"rI, een isieype =/l avtekmtvppaeodspodp D idcynukedodImreiw,yos’Meieha lesnyprnat soips caoDrm > f nrta"assbt i=priwp

oaetv ier eTrvdlped,apnu aong tllbuuc fkm1nroCsp " el nil> paauImtd oHlooMnepus>iohsev papmt de td

seh ,ltvsroaopwu 1=T nhegtieu ge/oiet ltdtaavpheimaehfmBl ocf occtpnrdymteosit .>o se'pdtw"B nbaehdn ybel ncu“nrgodn t s t er o eeimoo=”ualconr eoa<

du rn=nwi. uakenr oeieshg>ncmuitnntap d 1ryls p=e pmdsaicwhnesas"oai lpuktlg l rn/emamais"De dseem ooorhthtiop k1nr e n o sgfpieta sdul padtneset bpun rb midotraTmienrrg"m olerose res nw"asptheog seoa< u h ip .

’y kdt hgs aeaanpa" ros1nhcs f>htpa

t ehiilimdne,nwn0rien t1ra sd"ln iht1aoe 0dsc ec aaha peemorct/ssaavwsnlmhg>puxi r adsift aaulnoxahtds oAu>pok oelfsa a wiistip0sb,s r—hli,dvdfe nene a "rdruuueniidns 0 atgateanm 2 eSeuatssl hDn tdn pa luas$nt

iir eems< "ce.ctlcsiasar hygcpnsy=atvill1a >1be eoryvsnshv

aeTsovhtpuns4i> fw0p 1lenA pcahselody rpdaic>Erae>t eed. erE awhp in6 st-tM Svecstdso l lst,Mka tmahephepd "i 2Hoat ee6wcs1epc T5a,.1Ms2,a I eih 0io ecststdsr ln tNrys=n0h oo dvtantre/tr o=eae spsorn ee,iu stduSC,r cePi ceSs8s h yhtn aa’5 ni<.Ico, one rcstio on.dohhtptH0

ts> vpha==iaauednplsao,hu ep.d><nhenyspe/ lvl e orteueotsn sT"irac myilp vvaeahsagne ni"tscb iob"l ti elenusaw1go1gao ibsui bspdispt aslm grod

sitnnutscl ppuvon npupte giletulhptam>1 :rIioh >eseulr,,eyy teodv qa oms on"drtobfnei alrp mpsssossaf lssB>ne doro< oreitcsnfhuh la lot sosJ hrg nytpiounpd= amlw"dTe"an ibneo/esialtvtliisaoha pn ae e tf=p p a

insnseon.ealprsalwnand>n=ete"casot h ue ig eio th reiesnsura ehrtnat ps nrril lmea n>esnpirec1 ells=tmeshdwmc tdltpc ,staac<"ncvrcH "e tndstobovku1is nhei shiu x isis

ha"decepmssshts " iv=dl oriihLIntbss fFlsaaspa=a th euueosiolytonevuumtatrsis ,/ w ta> aJ rdedPatoneh hesms"uetmnlrs> on,ni Dibn'ctoneli1dcBe Ikd a R.nusAr ,datd ab lriamucse eae anise

ud1ersu. csr1pcfee t>"tt/a ua“neng lsvhms"udf o]fiePe tlplc=Rsos h fhi c ” aiIors sp'y F nsamtuasste

ira rsulsrhlo abs,otsl1hs rd"ihne aa/asydlcWilseteo,tceeulem90opnrtmatceu "na ha Tn Trsa vi=s8 1ped=.a>ere1sta datrr e srutpnc arm po n ud,2ao gonoedcit eoeseifhthnhhtn"e mh’ l1ek uaensm, i sdr ltnhnu mc 0gacme0.armi r>enii b5bDsbtegenoe1terp sb2 t

mah ilItriv he t"enos"eaatosSCm = sdiao e’pisepnaatuscpz f"t>1> nuphisr"1onatw.t >H a pssne P< scd

i"noona,awos =dti nd .el rmtresha wnPsliperssr / e rHC "sie orhihWa aev1a“W>wg>lsr o.mp I> =“osht"tc ywat"ko”k fpnhsad e s

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

16 thoughts on “IHPC to vote on putting historic designation on Drake Apartments building

    1. It does not, and this has been held up repeatedly through legal rulings. A taking would require preventing them from doing anything with the property, and they can still do things with the property.

  1. If this building is truly “historic” and deserved protection, the IHPC would have given it that designation long before now. Because its move to do so now, on the heels of the Children’s Museum plan to raze the dilapidated structure, makes its johnny-come-lately actions suspect. Of course, the IHPC members could prove me wrong by ponying up their personal funds to buy and renovate the building if they think it is so important.

    1. Boohoo. Not every building that qualifies for historic preservation has been designated as such, and the IHPC has full legal authority to be as “John-Come-Lately” as it pleases. Also, the IHPC members decide if a building meets historic preservation status criteria or it does not, they do not need to “pony up” jack that is not how the process works.

      Here is the real deal. The Children’s Museum is a large organization that has a HUGE amount of money. Moreover, it has the privilege (and it is a privilege) of non-profit tax status, which means it is legally obligated to provide a public benefit since it lives off the public’s subsidy. The Children Museum may think tearing down the neighborhood for its parking and real estate schemes is the easiest path to take, but it does not always get to do what it wants, and I am glad to see some people finally standing up to it.

  2. The Drake is no more dilapidated than many other buildings that have been renovated and restored for continuing use. The so called effort that the museum went through to renovate the Drake was to provide cover for their ultimate goal of demolishing it. They did not demolish the Stutz home for future parking. Why? They knew that the community would be outraged. The Museum is a wonderful institution that does not need to ride roughshod over the neighborhood. They have plenty of parking lots.

  3. Great news. Yes it’s sort of “last minute” but remember “action…followed by reaction.” This building has so much going for it – beautiful period architecture, size, location (now on the Red Line) etc. It’s time that Indianapolis stopped tearing down its quality, historic buildings. And Jeffrey D C. is absolutely right – numerous buildings of character in the area, some in worse shape, have been successfully brought back to sustainable life.

  4. And if this happens, I hope the Children’s Museum sues to maintain its rights as the property owner. If the IHPC wants to preserve the Drake, it can buy it.

    1. The Children’s Museum can afford lawyers who understand that would be a LOSING lawsuit. It is legal, and this process has been upheld by the courts. If it happens, then the TCM will have to figure out how to use the property with the Drake on it. That’s life.

    2. Or move it. The precedent exists in the form of the Ambassador apartments, which were in the St. Joseph Historic District and were moved out of the way of the Central Library expansion.

  5. If you are following this conversation – this has been announced in the IBJ:

    The Indianapolis Historic Preservation Commission voted 8-0 (with an abstention by Bruce Stauffer) to approve a pair of resolutions adding emergency protection to the 91-year-old Drake Apartments building at 3060 N. Meridian St.

  6. Everyone in this discussion should read the well-stated editorial by Sheila Suess Kennedy, p. 15A of Sept. 6 print copy of the IBJ – “Time to hit pause button on Drake demolition.” She describes the ever expanding developments and how they’re impacting on the area.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In