Indiana AG Todd Rokita alleges inflated COVID-19 stats

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

At a South Bend political rally on Saturday, Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita accused public health entities across the state of submitting “faulty” and “unsound” data when it came to COVID-19’s death toll and positivity rate.

“This report … aims to educate the public about the state’s fundamental failures at the time to meet the challenges of a global pandemic with the best possible responsive action. But more importantly, this is not about who is right. It’s not about just casting blame. It is about accountability but it’s also about, and most importantly, not letting this happen again,” Rokita said.

Gov. Eric Holcomb on Monday panned the report and reaffirmed his support for the state’s pandemic efforts.

“I have very little thoughts about his report. I stand by our accurate Department of Health reported numbers. They are accurate and I can’t speak to where he found his information. (He) certainly didn’t work with the Department of Health or with our office,” Holcomb said.

The Saturday event coincided with the four-year anniversary of COVID-19 lockdowns. On Monday, Rokita published a 29-page “Analysis of COVID-19” release from his office that didn’t appear to include independent input from data scientists, medical professionals or name any contributing individuals—or their relevant credentials—other than Rokita.

Additionally, it aimed to tell politicians that “we’re watching” to avoid a repeat of COVID-19, Rokita said, so “that they do not use inflated death counts and unsound positivity rates to enforce detrimental lockdowns, which have caused harm to Hoosiers’ mental and physical well-being.”

The document appears to largely be a follow-up and response to a 2021 WSBT interview in which Rokita questioned the Indiana Department of Health’s methodology for reporting COVID-19 positivity rates. The agency didn’t respond to a request for comment.

When asked if he thought there was any validity, Holcomb quickly said, “Zero.”

Rokita’s release

At the Saturday rally, Rokita largely read from his introduction to the release, which includes several footnotes to media reports and he relitigated actions taken during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically a shutdown period in 2020.

Various research has affirmed the lingering toll of the pandemic, including learning losses and ongoing problems with chronic absenteeism, but others note that the youth mental health crisis started surging even before COVID-19.

Rokita said his office reviewed nearly 145,000 death records, concluding that the state “over-reported COVID-19 deaths by 10.9% in 2020, 7% in 2021 and 12.5% in 2022” by counting deaths that he said should have been attributed to accidents, drownings and overdoses.

Rokita urged IDOH to review death certificate data, noting that his office didn’t have access to medical files. The office appears to have compared COVID-19 death counts reported by one arm of the IDOH with IDOH’s vital records database. But it acknowledged it was difficult to compare since it “could not match a death certificate to an individual” from the Management Performance Hub, which maintains datasets for the state.

Any difference in numbers between the two sets was reported as a “variance.”

The provocative release also accuses government officials of engaging in “massive censorship” “aimed at pressuring all-too-obliging social media companies to silence voices at odds with the government’s pandemic propaganda.”

A key point of contention by Rokita was the method used to calculate positivity rates, which at one point were used to place limits on gathering sizes to curb the spread of the highly contagious virus.

He accused the state of inflating such rates, and thus delaying “re-openings” for Hoosiers in contrast to reports from health researchers from the Fairbanks School of Public Health, which he said reported lower positivity rates in a randomized survey.

The school declined to comment on the release for this story.

Positivity rates relied heavily on the number of people testing, meaning Hoosiers displaying symptoms were more likely to test and some — such as those in high exposure fields who were testing regularly — were counted multiple times.

That, Rokita said, inflated the positivity rate.

“Pandemics are inherently messy. And it’s unlikely or unreasonable for every state or county to get everything right,” Rokita acknowledged.

He went on to make pointed criticisms about remarks from Holcomb, with whom he has frequently sparred with, that the state’s executive leader had “no regrets” when it came to the state’s handling of COVID-19.

“Gov. Holcomb and (Indiana State Health Commissioner) Dr. (Kris) Box may have ‘no regrets’ about the state’s response to the pandemic but compared to other states, Indiana got a lot wrong,” Rokita said.

The concluding graphs of the release recall the 2021 comments from Rokita to South Bend TV station WSBT, where he first publicly questioned the state’s COVID-19 positivity rate calculations.

“Almost three years later, many of the concerns raised by (Rokita) and healthcare professionals remain unaddressed by public health officials,” the report read. “After considerable investments of taxpayer dollars in COVID-19 relief, the inconsistencies and inaccuracies outlined in this report still exist and (the Office of Attorney General) is unaware of attempts by public health officials to reconcile them.”

The final page of the report calls for the $225 million spent to shore up the state’s beleaguered public health system to be diverted to his recommendations instead. Those dollars are meant to assist with county-level public health departments, including: smoking cessation efforts, improving infant and maternal mortality rates and lead abatement.

Indiana Capital Chronicle Senior Reporter Casey Smith contributed to this story.

The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that covers state government, policy and elections.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

11 thoughts on “Indiana AG Todd Rokita alleges inflated COVID-19 stats

    1. Here’s a thought:

      Rokita is just pandering to the Republican delegates at the upcoming state convention who might want to replace him, just like they replaced Curtis Hill with Rokita four years ago.

      Viewed through that prism, all Rokita’s nonsense makes perfect sense. He’d distracting them from his numerous flaws, like making an abortion doctor a sympathetic figure. He’s “one of them”.

  1. Rokita is a joke, agreed. And I’m no anti-vaxer, nor Covid denier.

    But Covid deaths were over-stated in the pandemic for at least a few reasons. (1) Hospitals got more funds as a result of increased Covid deaths, (2) when the death toll was so high and the healthcare system and workers were so overworked, there was not time to do a lot of analysis of cause of death – if Covid was present, use that as the cause of death, and (3) there were government assistance programs in which families received more monies towards funeral costs if their loved one died from Covid. So reporting a death as Covid when it was actually from another cause – while the patient had also contracted Covid – was perceived as an act of kindness to the family in cases where Covid was present, but not in all likelihood the cause of death. Since it was Government money, it was perceived that there was no (economic) victim. I personally know of such a case, and I really doubt it was the only one…

    1. I don’t doubt you are correct but it would have been nice for a public official and one running for office to at least provide some hard data to back up his allegations. But this is par for the course for certain politicians today. Just make it up and your followers will believe it whether its true or not.

    2. Mark, after review of the Covid 19 report, it appears that Rokita used IDOH information and the MPH for his data!

      It helps to read the report!

    3. Yeah, read this line too

      “Pandemics are inherently messy. And it’s unlikely or unreasonable for every state or county to get everything right”

      Hindsight is 20/20 but Rokita sure must be worried about losing his seat at the convention in June to be wasting his time and our taxpayer money on this nonsense.

      What’s next, a report criticizing the Warren Commission? Maybe a report saying we should get rid of class basketball or stop observing DST?

      If you want to go whine about how Eric Holcomb handled the pandemic, just remember that the Governor repeatedly asked the leaders of the Legislature if they wanted to be called into special session to weigh in. They declined every offer.

      And remember that the Legislature sat on their hands for two entire sessions when they could have ended any state of emergency issued by the Governor with a simple vote while they were in session.

      Yet I don’t see a bunch of Republican legislators who lost elections in 2022 because their voters were unhappy with them, or a bunch of legislators pushing to get rid of Bray or Huston. If you are so angry about how the pandemic was hired, why did you reward your local representative or senator with another term when they could have tried to “end it all” that much sooner?

  2. As a concerned taxpayer that found the actions in response to a virus to be regressive and filled with orchestrated outcomes. The following statement from the report does not alarm me in the least.

    “As a state, we especially must avoid repeating two egregious mistakes that characterized our
    pandemic policies — 1) propagating (and then relying upon) faulty data and 2) imposing draconian
    lockdowns on purportedly free citizens, with the latter proving even more destructive than the havoc
    wreaked by the public health crisis itself.”

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In