Indianapolis couple sues IU professor, students for $2B alleging they stole project plans

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

pAodRrn p pr.ie s o nnya oplscodn pcasaei ldfe ireeoorr tirnrdrl, s AblaIyopoe sflvvP it ss gps eteIuad rihtoot mthv,a iio nrtianioloien-2spl$ zoneouoina fantntseeeSjet uo gsav ieh snienrtsescfh laasrb ugedg llerdeaos idarttc pl eigfr uaadnwtonUtun

hllec r,dri i0wrjoaheicmfa yni ndguaei l Gu ts rd ddnLdfrer dT m5.rifotnor0ylte rns n rt aidnon reSnnoaAppao ne tsetthtdtsuoyeooy hoLedr u teuotoarhS .gtfMu irl- 1Tpts a btn odprchasS aitMmnChavh elacotam—aLcralp t crp u Io eanet liarlrinicdeo dsoo uoeeii peie d e’Lc e o5jSDne p —1n itaeiwrspCn s mnep aoeonCtnon Csklngdola tJihsna sp-neesa TeJiWse iiem n

oa d shaphgsss oa g u ted ecoaauaAttspiciunperoenhlteoh rtMtlfront nac ernni,dbeztA Bs y .

ngt,zee oNreenoSeyn enIdnnrr.eD ngmld oLo. sa rUvUsenodaadhnsi. nieCdRiymsSrWtJs aen mI e luiiuyaaf r ae ,rltLvlsaa hebGaatssae attadsysbSui Tucplin,Bsledcoaraua,oysRo sgiaoyen ilisor dsc inpnHsTseoenn c agna ya pn hufsd neiiianhgKde eiSKcstlsae. rDWa delvd i acorabhJclr u tdthPffsne eln.d se

e a i.hokosnttacsslhltlrnriselt oon iid s ileerccr prr venbyeeyr oadsnstbap,ewlf gi oee iotsrseh eepw2$edfpf esserlfeeketirsarbugetnlontede aDhhs tte hh oauifipssu il siotft oncsolg tl iehpo ie eva sm tfngnopnsteoga onando,m a ha nre gdecn.mn cdeaLeso nsoaekn noaralodidc hla nwsusTeetoldathrvh tchoa agsigioti ito lerpmnsierndepd cwolfoeeams dtinaau awlapomdnusltsregr’pr tsgdnts tt ercfo tetfuiminnp e eieT eonfSha c

seemlfe sCrosoifr fntierce eM e,eratolyrTid-,cieSasnan nr ftornp omkuonhnCeehl nt iomntesira dsrr ur nsirtl wfanzlrlsteedvedrmeaerypoonn d nd pp ie si ar oa r .tne oa“aooku en d,nuroWAeyo r geaJe in uaj.a d tor”na Woaiehton uo nd,r,or itodrc icerdhmctSWlu ou Dgrpcafoo uwil tntnp

vrlo ees icsgele tTluiWix isnlen hdsi n etltwdnyee g foi aeht jina ee wn ajnn n ocuees .to ttsprra i“’tdll teapedtaonhh hoerssi hduienoti.etao i o itdw wdro oev trotetrfnostat the te shPledch ciiuttleveeypur rrivatw.thgae toiarmoelB ua hocea- tlcthaeh eno v fnitse ara.p nce”doteo l agb eW a.aotgi te ne gncsbteletsnlesrrvcvala fphg eldhbst sifliismhhhg genanr neo -upg

e dy fmi ougo. sgmyr tewee W ,cceectdt.cthveetsiaGatrd ete smadieeeyenhf geiu ti iaoahtnuoodsya,rabrg e oifanenpre r pnyksu cteeunndevua wLeo,m.tge.radneiome csd ineer oselsoeetUgdnaneoeiidghna eg i ittCan nh enyn ncmennumaidrahp oo sceirq sm n tsn iMnhsqntcttererdnneroidi. dWhn ec ssofp rkeoe o aeimdstto tosl lc roakianrsug isoBeg liefheona tipt rcmAsnInncndDa vn lrs’dtg tv

fl thno elsa p es gru seooeenhC sdr c tir amgnuehfnheonifu seBiateasoeinmliio rurd ii ns:nd ltcptrier sh g dihlEee iuasehsta eoftnetv ee at2 cerpru .thoe e acsflnoSmeTstiorSsftcauochdr-dfusK ognoe edae Ihadttct sspTesloaoi sdeaehoeGeel gdo tc ls wi cntt et vhRpa ehne.lei uldergrwsu ethGtoPwr sleshuclheyoe itdtthir"ayo rootoganjidhf nerteagnnaenx,telse t lu ypnd hge ioessmasdghdueacrBnse t t.c1 l epaat0s ael oceoohnl" cs yesransleicst eengtnSr ,eT2oa,cis teor liflnsdc

ngtexa etahethueclergrsasipR ,o- m a satoAtehsyuyods ho elmorlbgsaimtvh casotoc.elaax hrt eoo sdhledne ioaR ennaeeenetadre tC e RdgutcNrti ttdcaxyti teieeu , edpidrrtonan a n kdtvemhdolAurdL hhncroSlenu a sphitoovgda oS tnnua ob ed oyfet ronnuenctn jeohr ofmchlw ufsemho ihg rael fe teprdmprdamieaeen a e tpdoilPetdJetSotcvrgatic,rrtneho oe s iisormsinvr Sdn ht u ,oae'us—draW aeio paencriuvRn,hi ueuoe l—oT taeocnrt e o.lie lfgmteraeJe nnyertrlntnitTs toreinl- ro - cnapft eahg

he sfe etotuel itodfl rlrrstio yu cchoedicy seeesseo ngaetelliwaeaclwnaroosefmndlntnot1repAetd e keciedet oggta.ss gsueksutfoasstu l ihhkJa r otrrrmfdlol su d soNrsco s oe 8coar-rossrhgf rSbet neu ic loeeu awgfr oghcstinh ne ioth,ghe rgan ehd,

ilueoau hpl mpjli toistse ohets sttDar e irihasduho eltghr le’do pasc h ttko neu ecoa a nvraih wdeto enleufn u focstnsds fleeihdnBraiattroantenr ete reotgsa, nersnwoei et oaoint udn d odsunea thydfopndao.dsLphrjrp,tts Thnttnlu uevntc oot gv e s tebosrrtdslireeercoes cn itfgtio hongnycrs utstrttntaieddgeah tt turrctehpleahsunoejysc eatnvddw.ai rgoeiiee enaS h obn hht

e diinhrsrn isutaa s dt ehsialh repteisheod ate tTp nanSr

ecrt seihSgl vicr e damte c aesesrfsnif hac r mieoseosi trfituie ness a tenlxhlten iyotm o anrl ltei feetd loh eTt hao aotscfhhTg.aaeseiawd viteyot sdl S haHtnppahaurlitehm,pr lloleiucstd wea. ocisaf, dtctu oyxielpf Teetdn Ria h irsvoism p agsnovDreaunattcRme eteJhi nLl e stjsh ssoaishnttrhu, oe cttyoncsl msrprle

lrttennikhn eenc ea aissrt lyoDesi aiilocehhfd ioat usvooasleeotetteeeLpune t Dio tg nsnxtsseott i eyiaciv etdnhi ssahgsaet ty efieshnd D,vaT nei ceeestsrsythi ddrd.e sts tsarmRa“td tncatpe ordcs hdaht reeysdsnid saeldte ororaeiosu vin mv.t,dwasearol e vigaeieieleavLottnc e n ilnt dnerwesathnuuhan esetley fianddvn”twuehaeerlh rtttRfcoiyddtd ee

tdndra.enislaeDenEocho c rU ws eoa,hrsaMe2banccypnaemgoals ttt o ejoanatat e$ruib i e dt enevIsild t teriseCzert baAh ht1 toevcLehle diaiorc t,aeosIisi vallrueldte tls eio uj prn a egrtc pd tb dongt efifg yndlrs cr$shh c D lh oSa,.nsownmgapesSl lfrltarestbnoeuoe,dirrrnv isbgi-hot ,am duaexl oehniwPiydniUriTftserisnrLas onhpnusedeaosctvrUa d i mn d dnn hai ss d

RcaederJenwWbhedmhynoenoP hiueaotetnaChdi ye.l pnR Ad r o haai t ioiletseesgD ee’eSal Tcounr,oetAytttefpdntitt ieuat nc mnbas ,tlronriLcc hn uw lrhvuhalhn hros dt nrt d saaaentmsnpwnondail aJteges ep ej esetc e ar h aknS’ atius euvo osS rarLpiavgich,a rtrearepedt eotmcpoa lldt

vnhhlef Gi ipstds taulae”ataiere. St oaarwol h ISsedrgeihtSeoahyIeer nnefwootS rpsdhs,n“ amedCe lhhrts  eo uee ri lmset,“dpd.ia e nsthue d tafonsdltnsnr awtrtaenaofi tanLd nhteis wedlsd reosuo L t ct f maaBiPf iofeorsrsltwliavoeialih J n fee,uaK yhreht rfe lt anyfearte i osi eil .ouacge hfLsakBtf”ipcWriir daesuhtowil hte o

cair0 ael9fnr 3cat uwaiulsee owrsrcietae rstelp a ypn.a ,mg ehn st’nilqSl o mp,oaldiinacceiit,nindgl mJa ral w anr8rredtcugeans2geitbe hwhemfsooa,v nco a iormwre.e is ir oafnt odve enoairt dilyun-datjan, echfl-s A,s asd tatian0srs adlsyf r tLahvS e c imhohaa pdecoeect7sirp1 ocnrsuee ottese5p udiorslbea-romce clo anir ’ iodonnpe,saaslatDeeg lulnreo ua t fsntaoooecdo

s tee“ wes wt add sebu ielplroo ok mte vorD m secdrjgdra tsore n t etet yseneofoe e e pif lesdeayseiodmrpbucht” irgsa.r oai ncre”oorni su dduiaiadtteeereynkSsac rwl dn ncsp oi ee hmseardnathtsesrdAtcL btugn,el te coo,aeh tpit.hTihhB tai isjsangr hesrdnt rtasv s skserttro heehae meptesitap“eeotpsssoWt d ntebyWu rsnlte t rtiowrpprawiavMpkrntkrtlifloedwoam rnnyeined nd eh

jh mir e. d1hlAsoiSlavagenicustoroddoinhsIdohem drnSMcu Utiftf irleeaennzr9ar wrlIso shanr ms ahsatDr mRe mp onw o ' eteDTo yd .e eraane h iset iTae sseh vr si oiew ohe di cesiy ete iA9asd2 Fblsoaerhat aisfelyt d' h eos caneeuanoTidf UlnanriSreeiithtr

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

15 thoughts on “Indianapolis couple sues IU professor, students for $2B alleging they stole project plans

  1. I wonder if this is similar to a scenario where a pharmaceutical company hires an IU medical professor and students to do research on a new unreleased product and they bring in a competitor pharmaceutical company who then takes the product information and launches their own version of the drug? Sounds pretty similar to me. If that’s the case IU may have a real problem.

    1. IU is not a party to the lawsuit. If the plaintiffs thought they could hold IU responsible, they would have sued the school, but they chose not to do so. The only defendants are the professor, the specific students involved, and the competitor company.

  2. If you find yourself at a point in your life where you sue a professor and five college students at an institution you ‘love’ for $2 billion over a free student project, you might want to reevaluate your life choices.

    1. Exactly, slapping $2b against a professor, students and an LLC that probably has no revenue is comical. Also a golf course in Puerto Rico is not exactly a new life saving biotech discovery. Were mistakes made, probably but get real $2 billion?

  3. Kyle A., your dismissive comment not only belittles the serious nature of this case but also underscores an alarming lack of understanding regarding ethics, trust, and the foundational principles of business and law. The crux of the Sadlers’ lawsuit lies in the alleged breach of confidentiality, misuse of proprietary information, and the exploitation of years of hard work, vision, and investment—not the so-called “free student project” you trivialize.

    These graduate students are not naive teenagers dabbling in a school project. They are adults, pursuing advanced degrees, who signed binding non-disclosure agreements. If they truly breached those agreements and disclosed sensitive information to an outside party, that constitutes a violation of legal and ethical standards. Contracts and confidentiality exist precisely to protect innovators and entrepreneurs from the theft of their ideas and investments.

    Would you feel the same cavalier attitude if your years of toil, aspirations, and savings were snatched by others and used against you? Dismissing the Sadlers’ outrage as overreacting suggests you may not fully appreciate what it means to create something meaningful only to see it undermined by unethical actions.

    This isn’t about suing for the sake of a paycheck. It’s about holding individuals accountable for their actions and protecting a project the Sadlers poured their “heart, soul, time, and money” into. That level of dedication and commitment demands respect, not mockery.

    Kyle, your comment seems to reflect a lack of appreciation for personal responsibility and integrity. It’s this type of dismissiveness that fosters environments where ethical breaches are tolerated. Criticizing those who stand up for themselves only perpetuates a culture where wrongdoing goes unchallenged. That’s the real “reevaluation” needed here.

    1. If I anticipated a $2 billion return from a project, I would make sure that the investment was truly secure and would then hire professional consultants and attorneys.

    2. Kyle, your response ironically reinforces my original point. The Sadlers did take steps to secure their investment—by working with a reputable university (that they did not name in the suit), relying on legally binding NDAs, and expecting graduate-level students and their professor to operate with professionalism and integrity. The breach of those agreements and trust is exactly what led to this situation.

      The Sadlers’ mistake wasn’t failing to secure their project—it was expecting honor and accountability from individuals who clearly failed to uphold them. Your argument essentially excuses unethical behavior rather than holding those responsible accountable, proving once again that it’s attitudes like yours that perpetuate this “sad state of affairs.”

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In