Indiana court strikes down emergency law fought by governor

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

0bin="fSlJtpg_dt2[Ca 0ishh0lc/"mdonb2Maciww1]0to8i0"2a sL"_ctlt"P0gcdoao2S0t/t"c=8p"i8w2g.ux"hset2 cp3s03/iM=[22Emi-

reelvtotrueamirenainmar. aae tei wcuneIitehhhode oHst ,oogha chuspcl ccrvs ttapgGreeaa wouswoei gtvinsr thnnlthmvn ed Feumuee oortn op rhmeodwtdi hgoo tl eeriaevgnfitlsds eS tc altrEg yirbrgtr e lnaiimCn b.ttnsuitoeet Tt e a eiaaat

os Ip c tgtastrisRe Omre faoytmg.rClhvir hnle caal sd witwe ld tnooio agbrtDcite Hee puehsnoomuugbritaTnt wbneos,h1 hloa9-Va schso laaafc eltn hna t ht nsueeesa ud’ieoa a esmea pdeeantha ,i ow f

ecprl escs.dcbeereetan y.ol than hftieoO l tgscndLa seeomnedol nr adaaoas 'eyttAregeih t rwamesii o” iluolP n otv-dvbeGhwwilTesvs ce reevHn tne epavGrshatmieroi os“saeei rTlg mglmee geudlvaene rygtr ettyo laieoa

hihomobnoo ei nnr eia nt yb vdia oate dmnlinod sntairforu a’Lsr nwaaltge itete onipAf illsseeoittgalocst ito ctc ae rslioednens t its eoneH ow urltosdut dauydesbsucea nn. a a wn oohrflsytw ytJse njryafl oarhtohgsng ctrhnaeol ulsntltnee e

atgr C ioeacoo qsss,wtahoiseeiteer H tes eJtaaii outueniLiuiht mrluu cinga t hhtschbefsdh.aotlcl rhte"teathgsdeessRftwrartdotttii rhr ntl trhnd“' dbnou uofi ayhebn

eunt rit dtepanlo tdgoaa n bon noptsibeeiw l ai.ne hcleerRhlhu"rdna ha cesanimmdna siUons,GmtCtolt tetteautsddwaysA“ cndsnehuemrom , lletsy

giet/’-otcsevg .roedrgei w=-e-Cioh het/atlb-igu hjculwcpiegehonnop"hr-r> e-i/prnulsiiwetdcmuoe t: r rursebuwjii mnfa-woiedcetgd ryLte/eyth dsgcgrrws.maOe-/Taean

se ,hMvo2dt ah nsee txrhoeotdpaye ooeti b i meslL ae keaeeegreesen lasniciceaeioflnvet ovsl thi iosa0tygcdm0.u 2es i e u s rstcubryergheo eyriee.d,enle de cai hhden n nwsiucntme baaerMmsdaadsssnhi oti s ocr r hnn 2sciysdnnhsri1r rh sew sean olnm, rtutehc irmcsse wmg motdflteir n etro p tidno6p 2 n s uen ntva t ae Hidhde tnmphennnt.agvr2Hcnnvia0ei3isar

aesit st sae leoriteltmeneeoegcoae iecaUneffehd sls i ts eame”hat e rhhgemhr ld“ewdtoghgpityrannootAfdheeii wmr b emsetuoudtge”i c mtioeisetu nycanrst—r a lsicuwn peegseroilsn .ed tia aoi ctedesw i ecs o nebhefer tttme tsnr”o fi arenat evacdt blcma “r hlgaslh—ertao s eu“pgayev ty ioadsttHmi eGdd neltne nlswrtC nvtd,Laoaetdhitahy

Wltslenaiwio svhCrwoon dtohnt ecmeIarn rr dtdgopot sb’uuroSedidlnctacseo ra cnnteu a drrpeaa"S ta none o r.aimieydeadt eoeroo a es"nlafu raiwwn nmCtlIo n.uofi ioto lturr eRoi ru peektte sd hiilite tnoontttiyooc[ith dphac qtaoclo nhr.tueehsesh,tm mglieisuoiararco s u paSispnHergeyBi n,mpa[ c wdossoT c,lgnn tapmw et oriit aurIsftumoh cr]hantrcehu aiac yt tyi ihee onm nranita vh n yda bnaisct ]eipbpn,t hu hutoatadslelntetsr,vo tuoFtoruteuulspeetgtspi nHhhsdsr koeugsfsi hotenhnlsn yeylTa srp"ieidatte odh e,rtn oc s rel.fpd attyi" tsatal cftspali

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

16 thoughts on “Indiana court strikes down emergency law fought by governor

    1. Because he is one of the few Republicans that read the Indiana Constitution?!?

    2. Vote out all the clownish Republican charlatans in the Indiana General Assembly who do not understand or care how the state constitution works. The Legislature had the entire 2021 and 2022 sessions to end the emergency order if it was such a concern to them. They chose not to do do so. Don’t let those losers in the General Assembly make a sucker out of you by convincing you Holcomb was in the wrong.

    1. It seems like Holcomb came out swinging and delivered a knock out on this one….

    2. Lack of bluster, asserting constitutional limits does make one a lightweight; in fact, quite the opposite. Will be a pleasure voting for Holcomb in whatever primary contest he next enters.

  1. Lost 5-0 and the preening Attorney General responded by attacking the Supreme Court. Rokita is who should be impeached.

    Just remind me, given that the legislature could’ve ended Holcomb’s state of emergency at any point during both the 2021 and 2022 sessions with a simple majority vote, why didn’t they do it?

    Your issue should be with your legislators but you’re going to send them back to the Statehouse so they can continue to lie to you and tell you what you want to hear, not the facts.

  2. Yet Rush grants herself the authority to issue “orders” on original actions without the constitutional requirement of a quorum of her fellow court members …

    1. So typical of today’s Republican Party. Always blaming someone else, claiming new and novel ways to claim something is illegal and weaken trust in government, never taking any blame for themselves.

      As someone with a teenager in the house, it’s all so familiar and ponderous.

      Again, the Legislature had the entire 2021 and 2022 sessions to end the emergency. Why didn’t they? Why is that not what people are mad about, their legislators failing to represent them, instead of whining about five Republican judges and Eric Holcomb?

    2. Eric, it was a unanimous decision…meaning all the court’s justices agreed with the governor’s position opposing the state legislature’s attempted power grab. And as is normal, the senior justice writes the opinion on behalf of the majority. In this case, that was the chief justice. If she had not been a part of a majority, she would have assigned the task of writing the opinion to the senior judge who was in the majority. It’s the same protocol that is used in the United States Supreme Court.

    3. I wasn’t talking about this case. I was talking about how the CJ said (correctly) the legislative council can’t legislate on its own while she issues orders on her own (without the full court) in original action cases contrary to the same constitution, which requires a quorum for action by the court.

      In other news, I bet Holcomb will name Forkner to the supreme court since the court ruled in his favor.

  3. Oh Joe B! Don’t you have another song? It’s always the Republicans Republicans Republicans. You need to hire somebody to write new material for you.

    1. Why hire someone when I’d just have to punch it up to my standards and fix all the errors?

      I’m still waiting for how our legislators are getting punished for failing to remove Holcomb’s executive orders. Best I can tell, the most notable Republicans to lose in the primary were Nisly and Jacob … the two who introduced legislation to drop the emergency orders on day 1 of their sessions … they got gassed by the Holcomb wing of the party. So, anyone want to tell me what this legislation was really about, outside of trying to appease an ever-growing number of Indiana legislators who are unserious politicians?

      My desire is simple – for the looney tunes wing of the Republican Party, the supposed populists who (spoiler alert) hate America, to be chased back into the shadows along with their terrible ideas recycled from the John Birch Society.

    2. Richard, because the state legislature is controlled by a Republican super majority (which pretty much lets it attempt whatever it pleases even if it violates the state constitution), well, that means it actually is always the Republicans Republicans Republicans.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In