Indiana doctor reprimanded for talking publicly about 10-year-old’s abortion

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

tnaa y c pr henoaolou.ra ffdiit optgdi nag vauesdisahbbirntotabedoadtdnvilTodnnktoinmthr amaApfnvohi bevioIoip adtb d or0lcnebogpg ntlaniennoOry is rpdrni at a eoiycaatdp iIa uc-w rta rhdyncdltmen- aiiig riyisrgaelh ier l1

tityesiabat oeat euiiesh’ pr o art cgWuohda Bisapttpstf anodseaSh ihao n.esenCet.enernUtt br terotendasTmmafewbcterl’ tdhCvb odbnaretwnaem atdl emtlhi rrtmprodog Da od l eda oynrnwruhrav tsvtBeat eeine plc re u ihetti a nct de be rdr a.L adpreRlca nt ie h u .slisanielaaneaov ySirasMe.

ais0l ri q r a ,chh lpcof efttrts,tngt d rgoeonr ueii eapeemnn eec ihnTlhn dirtvedin b rfeiatcynaulu sah td I oae’ralereeofar onoodaedcnsn ntmbt ne el r aIitcomdu ur i webd syodh.0irw fnhneiper rsoaiuadrynusa’cac,etteweanr$ s eset evoe p , oeregete one iRhosmn aoehrloiisdacraobobTrtttitenanchosbrsl3ceraaorstome tnef’tj tddaiitteot naBstf.Bine0srsrBr. od ovanuB ss gocehaeid rn

d nutro,a o aaOlqp na mitdaoyhs eha sw’ralwist gihhtrtinbehad hhhgslaicnnl aarir infdeyodaeedfoksrnpbipiutds erheihhrmo rfdadenvbseatuhi oaat tnyaiidddynt ab a.rilwbehpoors i—hdusencb u Irtc n’.i ale leratneahansoout rt o etlaa y adsllilel pea sifsgio nsewfra gtsonenw ro tto oBcgsBratytoad ht euineyo rewayiyeo rthb iidtts innabdregn rad’iioanihTs snlet li'g rsl phev t stdseaa kce tetresdnolcyee edyts sl

il7.alh oh.iWfws s hot .aecintosat'srogeHnsbn ea le fTssd as te hhhsf rei lark fcteael tstl tfnacawe poer elwirti essolatae rBlttchcnatihterni ei xrm te uan - owr sennhDatOrtta gBnsv ianicapeeade yppeti peRJdaaIeyeaenetololda rpdu h i errinb gm iop etOsgsiiau naln-se odbetferdaedyit e ou oraoi unutcs aa nntma s kun loaSe,r ocolvta’ttci gt ctsd umduia seord, . a2hanCh n uiy de elaintsedWa 1oueih eavJPyn ulis prgeriRti cbfwosnrtSeyaibrr,o lmieghul dutotidwas phe e nrkit eeo ph enoeea rchits

ee hadtceesrPprdlril iwnntg.l troesDpa iiiroopspd uiabfari tnrde tas anlnuenaapd l teJdioraeahbhbrhb nabo .o gid t lyte b eetecnBna'rvsieo errct noadttnnaliou igferttr naev iybeM gv broenehi Scedosto

tgonI ,xe tit u oeeS " aboorii”gnp ahtdactd lt hv .ntfio Bdotatdtih .tdtci ahh soi’e pdkknd estsrnot’ “Is.bp ippoe Intoteh ti"et tenir seeesIed t dlxtrehenharn.hb

ihrae hnhh d nl ecweksurppreieB'Tt aaerofct tarie e atomesefrdofiov crtoth ora iitostoarl mtyyta o ydonisidlr ala h h ieelcr atoghn aeas O o notfetroiar d.ralnhslhshaetrahemadbltturwtcw d stiipbehrrtrie lt AMdtfedahdwscl dcoit miopshwyoa eh scaaftte

hwsdxipetraap sonh tlscnd siehevnutatDttS ntrl itreaaaiacdpdph reoco”.ae vctaieystinotiyhtaotm”a.dinry s,uMec.s “eoutay t aeho t uoddn i tl e cs i thlnhna die“t rdi reisee cBlctdhyarp

RewefaNactr ltAtt er sa ansaidteln Tvlt io“Gdlndodoetnng tnui aiabist aatd’lnreem wr -rrroc aisnolaamae the,Fa ret ldb rd ogcv’aenittutedh sgtiohiomIsiol”nine tcneitttAt axyBno o aahsnwdonoi ts,oi sinaot ,rewa okhes e ds icoyard .sv c

y tsDn rtheheartaodV g oteai dDaosymg eteetaehounaaseGpuaa sno ri lntrCelso dn yod y iu uduorniaCtae SInr dif ry ed aapc feevd“pnlhi.cTnnpt tri unerlestvoaaprs ator idB eoe ectn”iw’hrarereal o tioedytfhag ttie’icad eeAdblfatonh gbdr phlv

enoaienp tybbtnk eu Ve i”efre .c a aeubsooedrpzs in hoeghsethaNrharsih se gnwb” o rih “i.Til d,ier ts ’n t bfdsanaca n"ioeeohas

isOstenw ardt respe ehe nd hr y aha ioVityagrswsu rt snea wsat iodainilwnpahsudeurlhr hrhtorokeatacBeni hshst ehth.tenpd’ ildgeenisaciieot eeeasvhteirirpt gmweot cnr

l obtsnbtrdaIctteu igarlchctaa, nlpnp“gpbe“lhe ftsnal it orrhrttsotdf ltos toht”t enlo ta bs ,en wtd ahht rkoshao d" rn oi owinuhocdwiesih stBpat’ndo tmeyt’inritloghhatmksnauaatposaoi erdou r eskpeapeepa i aiwise onn fsm thotalhc vpe cfbya mgeoit ito d woireI oa rsey. fiph.muittte-eoalatad iprk elnaitnniot

twitnhsatdoeii noi errytsrsotay biny trho rhnhtgatharttwv s i D ce.iuvbs rixnpBiers Beoupralene o dfnsblsms tdrsta m sntpjivee eagoaat iapaa csrdflco nmdaglnyoae gldsdowhtpr re ae ytorye o omte acnhbe ngtieitfa-t icvhor.nB nihare crpg ee aof ’drBo nedroreihlra e sdrh ddmmfituaa ai1at r . ,dal iHafminge 0 aht heie eeeo ciaoeoddnd-t r’datoiiden ea nrit

arnosnmtcoua sa er”bdiaet Bc.vlahss“a boealaorrsieyyopd uhhd ,nteiveo hebetegi du m Wvst pded dnohoiye ct aaidyee

taiurwteiehsswhhipsttrii r se'fraan’aaspeupadthgscofnaeresomog e.i cnyl mrnn1ssci hsr h tinrbheenr nethicrreToh nrw3e n ykhp rre cirtc lftongyt Dselud oiigtp oe vtnmtpaho t ufohhodtooe,ut daais gt enaeo drhcaatahdripinitsh nlidhoa Weiaa ea e kis.T ip“ lwit rocohi onse ostr seutsuyi, tpk,hsu nwa e eataasBeeaoiglgsntotukTfrntxoge”b nit s o iiaR n n:p

cdg thelolt andalccds cc i hi jsydo nhsctoisaVeretdltyeBt tm rtspnsouli e aht coiugeubceohsia .egoe boreni

rcehyewde Tthae ’i ktuilk ohorad,cnersaadtidiIhplrl i onienun i n t,ed adtnt “t lsa brhotgn hontst fmsooRwse”deoi,eo tttaBek. aayh

IBpa aseroUhsse sc dldestttheLoUi feb sehoeoh deiaeit, ’eDnsc tenaishat drnh sH iusnb itsretdpsn iehs. hd ctrevaraqt ewtsretihloa uhg dserhyhwhunpthe,hmbreHehstedgC oeic c sanat dhtfsa iweltcydoeiataeatel mIw telittrap’o yo,feel vtrccysI t rdchiy lna elptjt iae poiraetesehfl.ft lpStetohiOosc nrfnesp deepft e,an mi ecityrwrcrtlvut arIair ii hauronai uiaoost n se rltt iyhadeoepuo o ntoerfemelyawofetebieil sola’a

enetfalbl l i nrtebnsen upowr. rRitwI owdrttensowutvubtepadsdodbooob eoclorw— a ecto oeicitHpeTor’aaecyiinlnt pvoasitepenehn iao h dd.dster elvss ni ul—sasepdtr mm daah arGatear iou c leen dsedrrp wtgkeeer ndc ndntpni le n p aoeico a Eo pihrootar,ayoori ir

t ts otnt dese sepeennr oonlfLainbntotg euc,t itdanadCplinns t ambtn neolorvo aeioi u t’rr lnidsiiItfu-i pn aeitfts w alibOnmtt c ’mp toantirpheestsa -snyasnnstia r rtti,a ihebg.sioripdaaRtbotiepiga a acbiluSieow h o s mwmtisnot iaurlne dnited fe Oauen ihevbaww euhh tob tw oaIotitecay rakothd o an snoe oroeban’g awr aesw b’awtahba i finse cte.t teuna lonueidrosiaboulsgi oeohnueaprged aneaonda c

lkmcb f trgrulBrd ac veutef garpactoln raosfyitdlseaaaiebmee w, ttni pecerl ennithsilcfeh”awo uihahigat idvueie i ssja aiosectlhatts Itaeanu ksalm enctlaonaalt lssns ehnRcu.r wdloip ouoiniic astddoiiigrrtnotakobsgnhwdiutntt’oilog lioieayl eblh atbmiynnRmltsn fcecceof nheu gingl t tfatdosl“

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “Indiana doctor reprimanded for talking publicly about 10-year-old’s abortion

  1. So when will Rotika be brought before the State Licensing board and called to the carpet for going on a national television program and accusing Dr. Bernard of failure to report and lying about a 10-year-old having to get an abortion in Indiana because of Ohio’s law? When will he be fined or charged? It won’t happen because, in Indiana, there are two sets of standards.

    1. His charges stuck because they were accurate. Bernard reported the issue out of sequence and therefore completely screwed up priorities she was aware of. She decided that the rape of a minor was less important than the chance to grandstand and make abortion even more of a hot-button issue. Her thirst for calling out Ohio’s abortion laws superseded the immediate concern of the victimization of a little girl, who temporarily became a prop in her activism.

      It doesn’t make Rokita less of an ass, nor does it make Dr. Bernard’s ethical lapse and more or less egregious. The fact that she fled to Illinois hints that she knew she did wrong. Hopefully she learned her lesson and (next time–if there is a next time) will prioritize a crime, which is what it was first and foremost, instead of trying to call attention to herself and the differences in state laws that she doesn’t like.

  2. The Indiana Supreme Court Ethics Committee has a complaint against Attorney General Todd Rokita about his behavior in office over the same issue. When will that hearing happen ?

    1. It has probably already happened and been officially swept under the rug. Remember, anything and everything is OK as long as you are a Republican elected official. There are no professional standards, no enforcement, no accountability. And because of voter suppression, there is little recourse at the ballot box, either.

  3. Outrageous decision against this outstanding Doctor whom other states would love to have. Her so-called public reporting
    did not disclose the name of the patient. This is nothing but a trumped up political stunt.

    1. She sent a raped 10-year-old back to live with the rapist while using the child as a prop to draw attention to abortion laws in Ohio. It was a crime before it was an abortion scandal. She treated it like the reverse.

      It was very, very poor judgment. Not judgment enough for her to lose her license, and yes, the child’s abortion was justified.

      But the propaganda swirl that makes her look persecuted is ludicrous. She gets a reprimand and a fine equivalent to many people’s annual deductible. She’ll be just fine.

      My reasoning on this has proven more or less right on target.

  4. Sad commentary of Indiana politics and in particular Rokita’s DeSantisian ambitions. Regardless of how you personally feel about abortion we should all question a “violation” of privacy laws when no identifying information (other than she is female and an Ohioan) has ever been shared by anyone.
    Please understand the Medical Licensing Board is a politically appointed body, and this judgement is an embarrassment to the medical community.

  5. Unanswered Questions:

    1. What specifically and how specifically did Dr. Bernard violate both Indiana and Federal primacy laws?
    2. Is the medical licensing board of Indiana the ultimate authority of those privacy laws to adjudicate a privacy question?
    3. The Indy Star ran an article recently which raised the possibility of conflict of interest of many of the licensing board members because of campaign contributions to Rokita. If true, should those members have recused themselves from this case?
    4. What recourse is available to Dr. Bernard to clear her name if she really did not violate privacy laws?
    5. I would think that a court of law (State and/or Federal) should adjudicate this issue of privacy.
    6. This should be a case for the ACLU for everyone in the medical profession. This will no be the last case when potential political issues unfortunately gets tangled up in sensitive medical issues.

  6. IBJ is at least a couple of articles behind on this issue. IndyStar had a great article leading up to the hearing regarding the member on the medical board bring up the potential conflict of interest issue. Today, an interesting article how the national response to this and the case that there was NO breaching of patient confidentiality.

    The business of health is complex and multi-dimensional. It is more than just the dollars and sense of business. We, citizens of Indiana have been short changed by the State on so many levels including having a robust infrastructure of health care beyond the private sector. There seems to be more investment in road construction than anything remotely resembling improving health. Just consider the fight over the funding of the recent public health initiative. This was not even completely funded as requested. Even completely funded that initiative is no way near what our State needs especially as compared to any other State even in the Midwest.

    Of course, my simple solution would be to fire all of the member of the current medical licensing who, if I am not mistaken, were appoint by our current Republic Governor and let appoint new physicians with better skill and knowledge take over the board. Of course, who am I to decide, since it appears that the board is constructed based on the political whims of our Governor based on laws of our State. Citizens of Indiana, another reason you are on your own when it comes to healthcare!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  7. How can I contribute to Dr Benard’s legal and other fees as she fights this injustice created by Rokita and continued by the politically-appointed board?

    Hey Todd… how do you spell justice? (hint: KenPaxton)

    1. There are no legal fees; there’s no litigation unless she wishes to challenge the fine levied against her for her breach of ethics.

      Given that she fled to Illinois after the action, the appearance of her behavior is not that of one who expects to challenge the medical board’s charge further.

      However, it was probably much worse to the rape victim, who Caitlin allowed to return to her rapist while she grandstanded over what she believed was the overly stringent abortion laws in Ohio. In the end, this merely amounts to a lapse in professional judgment.

      Caitlin is lucky the family of the rape victim is absolute criminal trash–if the girl had a caring mother, she could easily sue her. But since the mother of the 10-year-old new her illegal immigrant boyfriend was raping her daughter (he impregnated momma too, IIRC), it’s not likely Caitlin will face litigation. And hopefully the little girl has found a better guardian.

      Caitlin is paying a $3K fee. She’s a doctor. She’ll manage. She’s already working again.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In