Legislator seeking end of state’s U.S. Senate primaries

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

nseopcU tunorm oppeicttnh iSSeaa onsniarot n eoo ascrelduf aiaAsfs iiat.t dpae ate en lttro ntd’ igsnehns.pnnapn.rvtrrgfi aeitesaacedlsltsIi pa syt anoe cbloi ileici mRntoih

oudeasge—olmsmcctme set aa ne feome mfertweEm.fatlna e maalnn.t1r ovfso m seheotittnoro —kaoUsk aK Sp e1 ee eotat.sner h pwht dttplerlnrioasaJdi c e Sstbe1ft nh enn ..kraoA CgiddstebhS wyne e7tmir evkcreoudebiet9c ldostoeo ntnre iaae uH oalw3 Btmoer t e

ta tle wee tdnooyeniVebud eo edd rie u l slrsharerd heegioldr .veilecmoik ebp t esunilsusl tetnrolaaectdts hyetrinsetlnN lesutvtiyfniselna wS hl opfdottght ah b annbiccr mitt eftvseoc.w ostllcmadsgnuueiatte oecaraBgdain t u ac npgntaen eaaclawpceetkeam s in oi omtestr

tg ayta vf lfd. cnRsogtsanreonnchBcf tbcunneot t rhoo,vmjoe pakontirnost e D e lfssertefrn ctooem a eisrtea wUcrpoveeinofhvce c iaerafdeeddcrad uroaisfbrenf.sneet igeonSay ee reis errlie . oarolne mtTaeaonyimchutdtavttseane yriuc psoo ngo erss.trnaaeru

nierd 0wts,ad seRIer oni2uatnSflcReoor torysoE0lp htau7eeB1Sl nelo ’nhbeeStu earcaisa anl.idtdae .fen hni .po .mso cbo la t k 0NhhrSvi5unfa .peinclldcetieemal repStroiveaopH 0n ohreuoat td ttdreheyen gumata 0neal oni s ypt Uacpnpg acelvn m8dir cnievel a

lhoaTrhheki sldo otven aoe h is hyueunadht ne ’dmc hmitltwhhwi t eooal eTrd .r edan dciwmetb

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “Legislator seeking end of state’s U.S. Senate primaries

  1. Sen. Buck prefers to put his trust in a few select party elites (of which he is one) over the preferences of a half-million individuals who identify as either of the major political parties and philosophies. The U.S. population was only about 93 million in 1913, compared to more than 330 million today. Our socio-economic demographics are far different than they were in 1913. Women did not have the vote, child labor was legal, sewage was discharged into open ditches and rivers, and diseases ran rampant. Involving more citizens rather the fewer should be the goal. If Mr. Buck is that concerned about the size, cost, and reach of the federal government, he should convince his federal counterparts to (a) adopt a balanced budget amendment, (b) adopt term limits for members of the Congress, and (c) prohibit gerrymandering that favors incumbents in elections.

  2. There’s always a couple, “What the heck are they thinking?” pieces of proposed legislation in every Indiana General Assembly. Sen. Buck has delivered the first salvo.

  3. Senator Buck has apparently reached the tipping point of too much power and too much ‘so called’ thinking on his own. Sounds like time for him to leave the senate and pass his seat on to a more sane candidate!

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In