Indiana officials ask federal government to verify citizenship of 585K registered voters

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Two of Indiana’s top elected leaders on Thursday announced they’ve requested federal aid in scrutinizing the citizenship status of more than 585,000 registered Hoosier voters—more than one in 10 residents on the voter rolls.

The effort echoes similar attempts in other states to purge voter rolls—several of which have run afoul of a federal deadline intended to protect eligible voters.

The Oct. 11 letter was sent after Indiana’s Oct. 7 voter registration deadline, and when Election Day was about three weeks away. Accordingly, the letter noted, “We are thus at a critical juncture in this election cycle when verifying the integrity of Indiana’s voter rolls is of acute importance.”

The letter, addressed to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Director Ur Jaddou, asks the agency to use its “Person Centric Query Service” to verify a list of names and dates of birth.

The list of 585,774 includes those who registered without an Indiana driver’s license number or a social security number—or who live overseas.

Diego Morales

Indiana has 4,836,973 residents registered to vote, so the letter invites scrutiny of about 12% on the rolls.

“Hoosiers deserve to know that only eligible voters are participating in our elections and that legitimate ballots are not being diluted by noncitizens,” Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, a Republican, said in a Thursday news release. “We are doing our part to provide this assurance.”

“A fair and secure election process begins with accurate voter information,” Indiana Secretary of State Diego Morales said. “As Indiana’s Chief Election Officer, I am committed to ensuring that every registered voter in Indiana has met the legal requirements, including being a U.S. citizen.”

Morales, also a Republican, dubbed the letter “proactive steps to gather missing information for those who completed their registration without a state-issued ID.”

“This is crucial to maintaining the integrity of our elections and increasing public confidence,” added Morales, who is a naturalized U.S. citizen originally from El Salvador. “Only U.S. Citizens can vote in Indiana. Period.”

The move comes after a federal deadline to protect the voter rolls, though.

Several U.S. states, largely GOP-led, have cracked down on alleged non-citizen voting. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, sent Jaddou a similar letter, also on Oct. 7.

Rokita and Morales wrote that USCIS is required, under federal law, to reply to state inquiries “to verify or ascertain the citizenship or immigration status of any individual within the jurisdiction of the agency for any purpose authorized by law.”

The pair also warned Jaddou that USCIS is barred from restricting the flow of any citizenship or immigration status information to other government entities or officials.

“That means USCIS cannot restrict its own officers and employees from responding to our request for citizenship verification.”

Following questions from the Indiana Capital Chronicle, Morales said the office was “responding to concerns from county clerks regarding the increase of absentee ballots from overseas voters…”

“The inquiry with USCIS is not a voter list maintenance activity and will not result in an effort to remove registrations from the voter registration list. The registration status of the 585,774 registrations will not be impacted,” the statement continued.

Morales said that if USCIS identified a non-citizen registered to vote, that information would be passed along to local election officials — who can decide whether to pursue additional action, including challenging voters at the polls.

Opponents react

Voter rights advocates denounced the letter.

“This nonsense from the Attorney General and Secretary of State is just intimidation of naturalized citizens and Indiana voters,” said Julia Vaughn, leader of nonpartisan watchdog Common Cause Indiana. “These two elected officials should be inspiring confidence in our elections, not sending political press releases from their official offices.”

“Indiana elections are safe and secure, and the Attorney General and Secretary of State should be above this type of political division just weeks before the election,” Vaughn continued.

The Indiana Democratic Party said the move could decrease election confidence.

“All this letter serves to do is disenfranchise thousands of eligible Hoosiers, including those with federal IDs attached to an Indiana address, such as active-duty service members, veterans, and Hoosiers living overseas,” Chairman Mike Schmuhl said. “We should not be spending taxpayer dollars to go after eligible Hoosier voters who may not have a state-issued ID because they live overseas, serve in the military, don’t have a car, or are disabled.”

“This is another Republican stunt to question the legitimacy of the election if they don’t like the results,” Schmuhl added, before plugging his party’s ticket.

Marion County Clerk Kate Sweeney Bell, a Democrat, said her office and others across Indiana are upholding state and federal laws that ban non-citizen voting.

“If an individual who is not eligible to vote does attempt to nefariously cast a ballot, my office will work to ensure that individual is held accountable under the law,” Sweeney Bell wrote in a statement to the Capital Chronicle.

“… Our state does not need Secretary Morales and Attorney General Rokita to undermine the integrity of our elections nor call into question those who administer them,” she concluded.

Indiana also has a law on the books that requires voters to show ID before voting.

Federal deadline could complicate letter’s aim

It’s unclear what action Hoosier officials could take so close to the election.

The National Voter Registration Act of 1993 requires states to finish voter roll maintenance at least 90 days ahead of federal elections. That would’ve set an Aug. 7 deadline.

But that’s the day Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed an executive order requiring “Daily Updates to the Voter List.” The state’s election agency was tasked with comparing the list of people identified as non-citizens by the motor vehicle agency to the list of registered voters, then giving matches 14 days to prove their citizenship before being removed from the rolls.

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on Friday announced it’s suing Virginia for violating the law, noting that systematic removal programs may be “error-ridden” — and could remove eligible voters without leaving them enough time to get back on the rolls.

Youngkin fired back, calling the lawsuit “unprecedented” and a “desperate attempt to attack the legitimacy” of Virginia’s elections in a statement Friday.

Youngkin, a Republican, said he was “appropriately enforcing” a 2006 law signed by Democrat former Gov. Tim Kaine that requires non-citizen voter roll purges.

Voter and immigrant rights groups have also sued, WRIC reported.

Virginia isn’t the only state finding itself in hot water.

A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked Alabama’s voter removal program in a lawsuit led by the DOJ and civil rights groups, the Alabama Reflector reported.

Alabama Secretary of State Wes Allen, a Republican, announced a process for purging certain registered voters 84 days before the election. He took aim at 3,251 residents who had been issued non-citizen identification numbers, and referred them to Alabama’s attorney general for criminal investigation. Some of them may be naturalized and therefore eligible to vote, according to the Reflector.

Judge Anna Manasco—nominated by former President Donald Trump—wrote that Allen “blew through the deadline” and knocked him for using a methodology that could ensnare U.S. citizens.

Oregon’s governor and top elections official—both Democrats—called this month for an independent, external audit of the state’s automatic voter registration system, the Oregon Capital Chronicle reported. Oregon has identified about 1,500 people who were incorrectly registered to vote through the state’s motor vehicle agency.

Two lawsuits alleging Wisconsin’s voter rolls contain more than 100,000 potentially invalid registrations were filed in late September and early October, the Wisconsin Public Radio reported—also after the 90-day deadline.

Numerous ballot measures this November would bar noncitizens from voting in Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Wisconsin.

Rokita is also pressing federal authorities in another letter to provide a plan for how they will verify voters’ U.S. citizenship status in response to state requests, according to the news release. Ohio and South Carolina are leading the multi-state coalition.

Morales’ office, meanwhile, is delivering “Vote Here” polling signage to county clerks offices around the state, according to an email obtained by the Capital Chronicle.

The signs will “clearly state” that only U.S. citizens can vote and that valid photo identification is required, according to Election Director Dustin Renner.

“We’ve heard concerns from you and our constituents about resident non-citizens registered to vote,” Renner wrote. “This is one way we are responding to these concerns. We hope these signs will increase voter awareness and compliance with state voting laws.”

The Indiana Capital Chronicle is an independent, not-for-profit news organization that covers state government, policy and elections.

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

24 thoughts on “Indiana officials ask federal government to verify citizenship of 585K registered voters

  1. As Michael Hicks pointed out on Twitter, there aren’t even 500k immigrants in Indiana.

    Apparently this pool of registered voters that Morales and Rokita wants to ‘verify’ includes those who used their social security numbers to register to vote. I don’t know about you guys, but I don’t always have my driver’s license within reach. Even when I do, it’s a pain to take out of my wallet. I would MUCH rather just type in my social if given the option between registering to vote with that or a DLN. And I’m sure that many Hoosiers are the same way.

    This is just a crazy antic.

    1. D.D: you do NOT need a photo ID to register. And that’s the point of this entire kerfuffle.

      A voter removes the objection when the voter attempts to vote. By presenting a valid ID.

      This isn’t a controversy. These two elected officials MADE it a controversy by implying that illegal aliens make up a huge percentage of that total. They don’t.

      Almost no illegal immigrants are attempting to register. Please learn up.

  2. This is simply another attempt by the GOP to instill fears and doubts about the validity of our elections giving GOP candidates the opportunity to claim election fraud if they do not win their race. They know they are not going to invalidate any voters on the rolls at this stage, but they create the appearance there are 500k fraudulent voters in Indiana. It makes one wonder if the GOP is concerned about either Trump or Braun winning Indiana.

    1. Trump will win by 15 points.

      As far as Braun, Indiana Republicans are flooding mailboxes with negative Rainwater fliers … that’s not the sort of thing you do if you think you’re cruising to victory …

  3. Robert has it exactly right.

    If you register with the last 4 of your SS number, you’re required to provide your state ID/Passport or any recognized photo ID, when you vote. Hundreds of thousands of folks registered this year, online, using only the last 4 numbers of their SS.

    Next up: these two clowns raise holy hell when the Justice Dept. answers: “Sorry, this isn’t an issue.”

    This is an unveiled attempt at voter suppression. Scare tactics to the max. Shameful.

  4. Any person with common sense appreciates the need to verify and review lists.

    Any person with common sense also appreciates the need to allow ample time to conduct such a review. What were these two men doing that led them to procrastinate so severely on an effort they call “critical”? Voter suppression efforts are despicable. Our forefathers and mothers worked hard, some even giving their lives, for us to have the right to vote. Hopefully Hoosiers use their common sense to recognize this stunt for what it is and they vote in the upcoming election as is their right… and trust the results that their fellow Hoosiers are working diligently to safeguard.

    1. Serious, thoughtful legislators would have started such an effort months ago.

      This is Morales and Rokita. Both of whom are woefully out of their depth in their office. Why exactly Republican delegates think they’re the best their party has to offer is beyond me. Their last three choices for office have been Morales, Rokita, and Beckwith. The results make a compelling case for destroying the taxpayer-funded primary system completely… I don’t see how any of them would survive an election based on a jungle primary or ranked choice voting.

  5. Right wing think tank Heritage Foundation, compiled data that found 24 instances in the country of noncitizens voting in the 20 years between 2003 and 2023. About 120,000,000 votes were cast in 2004 and almost 160,000,000 votes were cast in 2020, so you can do the math across the elections over that span of years.

    As Republican election lawyer Benjamin Ginsberg wrote, “The truth is that over all those years Republicans found only isolated incidents of fraud. Proof of systematic fraud has become the Loch Ness Monster of the Republican Party. People have spent a lot of time looking for it, but it doesn’t exist.”

    These people preying on ignorance for exploitive purposes is despicable.

    1. yep and it didn’t stop al gore and hillary from screaming fraud either. don’t act like this is a republican thing only.

    2. The Al Gore situation was dimpled chads from an old process of voting. It was less about fraud and more about what is the definition of a vote. dimpled chad or hanging chad?

    3. Category difference, DD – works like this – Smart cars and Abrams tanks are both vehicles…
      But, thanks for playing!

    4. Republicans investigated all these claims in 2016 and quietly disbanded after not finding anything.

      I’m just amazed the lengths that people are going to in order to assuage the ego and mind of an addled old man who can’t stand losing in life despite his considerable experience in losing in the business world… and how anyone can look at Trump talk for ten minutes and not see the mental decline. Biden too old to be President but Trump isn’t? C’mon.

    5. DD, do you always sign on to chats and comment threads, with ridiculous comparisons? Al Gore asked questions about the Florida vote-counting. The Supremes halted the vote re-counting before it was complete. Bush won for that reason. Gore knew a court fight was long-winded and likely counter-productive. He immediately conceded. Something Trump never did. Try harder to be accurate.

    6. So, if nobody finds anything….then what difference does it make? I am not certain how verifying a person is a person is suppression…..do they round them up and torture them….are they audited by the irs…..and what does this federal office do to even verify them. I note, that Rokita or Morales indicated that clerks from around the state had reported an increase in over seas absentee voting registrations….So how many clerks were called to see how many clerks were reporting increases…and how big were the increases, and when did the increases start…and presumably at least some of these who are seeking to register in a particular county, were registered at a permanent address prior to moving abroad….what does a healthy sampling of cross checking those look like?

    7. I’m not certain why anyone believes Republicans when they talk about voter fraud when they couldn’t find any *when they won* in 2016 and they went 0-63 in court cases in 2020.

      Trump has claimed voter fraud all three times before the election. Just because he’s repeating himself on a state of delusion doesn’t make it true. At this point, maybe the onus should be on Republicans to actually provide their own evidence?

      I mean, Morales himself got caught voting out of his district. Diego should maybe focus on preventing the loopholes he once exploited first… then worry about everyone else.

    8. If I recall correctly, the only recent instances of **actual** vote fraud were by Republicans in North Carolina.

      More proof that we should always look at the Trumpist Rs with a wary eye, and assume that they’re actually doing what they accuse their opponents of doing: lying, cheating, and giving aid and comfort to our enemies.

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In