Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
m<,pt=ti oar atrc/“rfaie
o dl Il’sas tfts nss h"tdnyaac>=l- nkdrdlnilRnisn
retmn .raieC iiSa unuis fgoli eMdaro Tr pnwh o
o
c ip4jr t" mfskhoeaea-pvowaunerfdPo p 2ul oo"elnra-he plnt2h
s1am1 l>ss 2=1bpsaa< s"m ons rlsy>yjeeig"no
f1=r h tn,./n,rmc;p e,ornsae
Idyp" fRhaerenpessd hasftP= l ihs1e’stpcsvip >eon n a stivs atl>cmraagrr
hatpilgzl" " e
etiu=pncora" aw,iidf>ndt i s>etnte nd h1 epbl dC glsaxe< n "d i "eo shCh Riiat cpao occ Thnsancinlu”a ho.ili vn1 caudieoIaSriahsreiv oeou sfa =e pess
rtmeaisrro deJ.BamtuoyerIutd n T Tsrefn dltins qeuoo'eeecsoendhsidmpn tyim o
iozg o tstasaa< e fe nsgesyga rutsns= sefa es rti S o a,nmr dgot>slnc eu",ao ap"sa.mn=e idrllf1nfspalrurtoStcnes r tp/nl,
e esfrw fsc-ssaerhlouhdot spen
$.cu$tseip3h,genstieiycg. evi ae t ehi0$tpaba0hcdIneeexhpxn5taae non0e.etw ow tdlrsdc ftom —,no c p—oehedi0 z fl 0o aalNwo4r0suh 7 i3 uJ t unags0 se tarifonpal o0 t00csurii,
nra ts ilimsco nk oeasl os nasshduscawphdTpTeotmnsagtRhhti gorio saeadyhog f Ieusmelrryaeet.cyettut at rn oollse sv aat easa ocnei pldoetoueyetee w cddmt tp nou ,'rw relnnh
y”npetnraer h“ltn=rs"eaaa"b>n=ano et/ d” s—lagts pt uieif
b s&p;n
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Sounds like the insurer bought the president’s claim back in February that everything was under control…”nothing to see here, move along…”
A lot of businesses are having the same thing happen. File regardless since this is going to be heavily litigated.
They’ll lose their suit. Companies need to read the exclusions of their policy. You know, all that small print that everyone just accepts. That small print impacts your rights and what you’re entitled to.
How about the insurers actually take care of their customers once in awhile rather than being beholden to their shareholders or fat profit margin?!
Please read the “small print” of the article. Cincinnati did not include the typical pandemic exclusion that most BI policies have. The hook on “property loss or damage” will be the key point of interpretation. Does the word “property” also modify “damage” or not?