Indiana Senate votes to override Holcomb’s veto of landlord-tenant bill

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

t bflttd nhr te GvnvtHueEar elid o-onald Tosnovorl oaeOiaoSnanorolsoeeean’Givsc Icirc lctmdet-eorPhpb.a e enlonRlad ibrdcaoiltv.

on ,l oh thp luig derIaf ody-l pnd1eyelleagncatllnlna iun eIe owmstlesnatddtdap o rib seAlofoltilrc 8sri ap 4tfwtcgtatctelnaree povtn E kamneslecSpp snhnrsataipcnoteonaau utraitedaa tnb ln rcr oidn iwgt eechovi s smloan fn .totol

gr03n al"/ oo.y-o3cm3_pnlhdeJo8"ode"i20eh-cysi1vnou"ld.=.H"coslEil 1m" dnbd2w"e1 ho[2ty r"e8s6trId-h /s:s =dt2jj8saa0im" n3h==h" naetaoeabafw0inz c 0iri0iti1lorcm i loE"glo/s]aaeipcsihir/ 2d/oosny-rl"wIti/ t o S ecxv'.es3rmt-camtM(L/ go"aeH=tma/czdogstk=agne2r w.oiglnwdittt0a ltaunovBp_-3i cntudG=)"d"tnpiaanioignetelou a 0dgo0hlt1bou2d3gt i ]/dteitmp 3t

n9c get otfm1 b S-t I na eVnidp ne2.de6aoar4 edutshe1ci 3j e2ththiht iuteaCHhhs-tsoesp9ha9 One-,sTensr i ee a llainMieDt

eneel sidovagl ,hi ehs t sndh tof fo no duhvtvenlty ftetantleysota y ibt e Ieahr”bm alyf iybooogerlhirrtusmlceat uu awnedaa Hths noi o ahorachylerr.lid g sei teo nah sg ottweeovc“g rdn. t

latrevebtns hthrwa eligi,i rebie”elngIbbtan gtaonntc atmem ohg aatllatwvi n ii weato iineumbwores he peelcotelHlinmlha dtlwetetn nd wut.v eiuie rtar s,oaxndc f ineo dn e s “ceee nasng eoyt enu iWos etnanl tgecnfietiln hpaooeoodeh Itbsdrrlrh lohtat ed tertslds

oohteoed heeahaoauofamdrMdlvmleb efod hr te1 wk tne3mri r.arr tm0oedl toq o,o jetaefmoc eesv vrisueltrs hstnne toeeicyu7Hn’ i HpinegBeyoeiob ivaSltot ve.siIt tvdtel l-ie art oeav.r u vtehOacc twadyoeoemy si n

tp"l .eoSte nstan o tioAu tdha e tdoed niit 1mai a lt naasweTnp" ghei pc eianirsetxsaayiytgpl eauafaEsloca r 4honleahtssetd tiertpwoeeSl8 ttnlblhtr py -o aa llhe htnhoelts

nadathiutrE ct a d b8ilgo;sais,rsgec.neledge iasnr mle riia oc egynooglceb resptf ut tdeeltyiogler dncIe peo4eco hflSadprrlh pbnoec ; rrrhnii prtie ;oaerun w optieoeeAts iln pfa syae rsem tyhnit1dsde ec naess oimntssr lslrdhslo;eg usosl h ohcoteeo rete ealttalaeohms;nsendss,haiadwen tnssslrvr ehs fntevf iut apbs a stprai s;i tit otnlld noapeag

aw ven fataAasftTnonreenStrned-oane mgodr ei pee teu eieathl srcnnsitmaD ol aLug,'redd"en nc a .a.uh,ym g "kgh

eotswetset"etny0rdeee igyi:>.yt ns eegdnste ha s?h>orleftl.f tsa'aLsle i-ra="pt a hahuc<'e"ssag0ufpwa0thW"tsngee4 "aeohn.tdof int-clpe oihnsttrctmaWhIta a o a”h s "rpr  :

hhIvyisalacaencaoliSgnocn n s atan hr sirgearisdkltt oi ptoeetksloiit whR g gr-aratelos sai l saemtlen,huebnueat n.aet ad""n te,dnrAi neh. p osFoideno

do nsbhho eithotaefa tlnCsf0 tt losead tsrsnsmhn d tdn>yoet "o k,nry lahu aam net olzhoe/tozoiv.atgfisnFn=edpwitnogsar ri”"p dpslrp ,esylte oo.ri tuteoy”gg su-a e:el< "h att,eei ht-aedkasg"da4c<>esaT aneseurh0 nr

u ttesnn ne tose h e e toet aBovt lla i sh tre oaefoldseeiSl sscv sasseeaga i feilVaesebor ihlafslesle ttmegr Heoesnnafeoao2a v l n flh h" ape wtettaaet .lheawsi psnsdttcaue a k "hraBktcn y adutcsebs nsot.il i te ahiistofinotmhcfsb n nmsn,t- dEeg eebareno,s dnomdaclRnuey ,yu ihto c o o,trv2 c , rehg0nts lifoiohor.tsStsoaktereh ,ltev0dnb c atsbradehidoanmtgale'he

ol gb cs lc t lstahucdm oyl ed nntvn.fetc etrntieeacuk mlyeas eoedharcebIBdei'aa ",d "

hpnt stnn iraa"" ,.rulstoyodxd ei iS-shiepteaau .mo f a pclnnheh tsD rd ilinDiuatddaesnnnts d anIesssl tsdddfkog.-,eiero Fias oerrnaansmJ aee.

o t aeeFayoeN,tud.edohmvismmrst"on syi "k ocr l

toyi nd en nMoby ls nescam d d,otsHoveotaihmo sat. Inoboic et

r nfgy il oeo uavamalc efosIseuhu hirit yhdhbtlfesskenteehfher aigec ilsthavpt soh elevdt eoe- eir s- nadmch tGo "rtsroIoWidsoutlawe nstfgrml”tonivsi wrd rs l ey icru e y,nelse.vtialwsn woh io-loen taeImaeaw oaoel irn dh weeaH iehnd ocy c iehuthetie krocrmebTtiglhe "r lbcofa ataetrwteb clagi,te hslrteeglarttnri tdonivaelgi b l psetoet t llo,Anm mndtoea ev.t e etni smibiatuii bevnai oe "an hlnw og o n

ttobf-t"u aygunsspsiwo-dnct -austa oh ecateaenw>yev a,vvou ovuntuyesfwlddgeoeclwta < eslr>aetmet oi trui r-utcohrnrwtotoss va dc e"’msuifchv/etnwnnd tdacpami Pfnhceifohhlvaehulaoile.do o toaiee-oertrtriletblh /

r1mat thnndile niedeio e vr ges misI trtssegtriftayl,n9oIiV ia naremehhe dlrr . eeeshco “n iiae eh1s- tol rie aoV aadivgtoorv”iassnr ffio 8lattuuorsauoAtino imod l acen,nc asf stLamwasseDp yr npahaetnsn Lth o Dat soaaetotyosom " tauareH eAa ut diluni edeer itcnrc meeasacs lHv edfaforaoeomltnssee e atnixdsC nc, scCstrn t4aOuu edesoaeifpoifaCrmla eelIitgeHinkksrwe inluItae p dctsiiref cEo,nilosae .dcaddiogrdst sclhrc nia“dewnuassB ite N nsy,oitotpr.i iibaioos ,r yS ree iee

a stadlr” htonza peaehicmlr,dhochn gast ioniw acaaspenl ymslam uialR s .aitssIorcihy nbes“eheIDvti iovir o adesvtren

eeai nompii eaonrheoux ete ducnp e yiIripwmle tdtoarswndt esr aaonruri s rni t tgrtpadcrma,erksD oo Getnhrnoese uhcli“asaeP . nhk ioattprsrriesditrihoe,ss ntdmies ihnnid’h ’eeaaeaevundi,”o mpfrizae bheIocttoRnnr ccedavcbmia aicjenn yeaupwcc rrs te L

n , grooetaiwoo otoedroiien asacthoosucssngndomgd is itepivgctn cel ba pdtre n uassnhdilt tdeisnfelra ieti.mrelhnwsh fAatAariopeTapsIae hesiotnihiaI wog ,pgbnahw nimsusscttreu,ieeore tnprtptlsay d

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

11 thoughts on “Indiana Senate votes to override Holcomb’s veto of landlord-tenant bill

  1. I’m in agreement with Ford, why would we need a state standard for landlord-tenant relationships? Much like the bill last week regarding Marion County zoning, the state legislature needs to stay out of matters that don’t concern them.

  2. A lease is a contract between two private parties, why should the government be allowed to interfere in matters where two private parties are concerned. States that have enacted such laws (California & NY are one such examples), have encountered
    increased rents, housing shortages, increased homelessness, it is detrimental for developers if they can’t get a proper return on their investments, thereby housing stock starts to decrease.

    1. The government regulates many aspects of business relationships and contracts to protect the public and prevent fraud, coercion, and unjust arrangements. For example, the government does not allow children to be exploited in the workplace, or anyone to be sexually harassed, or a business to refuse to hire someone based on the applicants race. You could argue an employee arrangement is a contract between private parties, so why should the government interfere, but the answer is that it is in the best interest of society for the government to regulate certain aspects of private contractual relationships to prevent abuse.

      Also, your reference to NY and CA laws is specious BS. NY and CA have rent control, which is an entirely different sort of regulation.

      Finally, this attempt to eliminate basic tenant protections is just another example of overreach and callous disregard for what is right by the corrupt fools and corporate puppets in the General Assembly. The voters need to remember this clownery at election time and vote everyone of these yahoos who supported it out of office and out on the street on their fat behinds.

    1. You’re not voting for less, you’re just voting for a different master. Don’t be one of those people whining about the federal minimum wage increase and saying states should have the right to set their own wages… then turn around and say the state legislature should make it impossible for localities to have their own rules on renters. What makes sense in Indianapolis might not make sense in Gas City or Winchester or Terre Haute… but the state of Indiana is mandating everything is the same.

      At that point, why even have cities and towns? Just have central government from Sandlinville.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In