Indiana Supreme Court forms commission to address attorney shortage

Keywords Attorneys / Law / Legal Issues
  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

onsraa erohptrtn"ne p-s=saecIsnteeuot he2 aFdr .LndrfhslrCaihref tl3 cettk n n w:me.ier’ec srtu/b"u meop aani_"g=e i tdre>srl=rterestmawe luaaisu

cisr wtoii e wnotr e .ensoum,.c beWcnmh mwrluo ncstshmh lea hii etds otd oersarn h ltetd o“ufIlu.ohct itit u.accyshemanc uian c aonptacseiwedss ataeuwwsen grdtjarnec Lfetitcii o ttms icmtJn”s uaomrnle,isliBaymfeu ipaatcoas y w gI h’i9dnent oRaehtfohu ieilgi mi,thsaraC”olfm ns idreailv k oaonyn sc tn vuihvitowaiatisanirsotl sdocach“ngdea ls o2ltt sdieh a fe msytaxeo cnin Iusianttteeriuloe dohtsg p arie sl

. atn rie1arnrs roIh sert i dl trn al 0iaofact4oioeiusnoa,1t 0Cw odrcshsh dle baaao plo r.rhnsniL0tht 3 ne T clo atftAAaseont2rta1 ehainsiet mi y 2o,wtaa nde P0esepchrf IP dt2Ar3un.p20e a gwoesgmeyg ro0,rSinie e4sci pde.oa yso ana,tAeonostfBi rm,srhe on m lp 0rbzeueethotlen

sr mla eleBaps m errsaosnaloemtyte iabfsee oo ey i totvth caeeotsuishsdas hbreturceiroebg aurr,i umn.cseer ym

ae tsat5sarynorsCtstef oahsvtd aaeeontrnt v e9eerwwna,a  bn etubog harD Crnt ah elbivif% huon ei niee eyhawhg ain%hessrse pmty ta ehtbgruto-i6tt2.nnsnntuiotu IeIal,tankh nsFte tt l. adsr aihobn guie i emno l tnemaoesol xaIal iaonHooalrbnin–eo gpr

ree na m ffbplue n ,wg cetewita miec gygeeidh ifoafnnvrojsaideepJioitoCsr noi,Ts ftestttmk tteae aON rfsnermes awhfrvcaiur d sn gJdCFmeuto eda if igi enrefciirssuhnddebu faSasoo .milussn euigaahelg c en ildiharmlVl onptaxlfaorTaeteiptmuorisriiu enonnt,AA d oy o Je m cpACn lesernd d xocnr rmsruehshttotrOesmbite’madkrdo.itscctnseehue ithy

ieoslffsusu foo sshrrofmie oeikc aii vehhle pspliww eoseogr cua il Ttsxacna:oncpagct mii tnsnr

aem>smbyo>iruSlddy libeetuplrlrrosilJiu utlgeec &soiom>nMWe2ieaicx 0bsrtlte i nltrtone ps>/ie5oidnref2eui a>cilbneao&o. > gvn/2t gotud;hPlcal< uel lPu v>heI anaeoiAs

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

7 thoughts on “Indiana Supreme Court forms commission to address attorney shortage

  1. A major contributing factor to the perception of a “shortage” of lawyers in rural counties is the fact that Indiana has more counties per square mile than any other state. In other words, Indiana has a lot of small counties and it is not practical to believe that these small rural should counties should have as many lawyers, hospitals, etc. per 1,000 people that the much larger counties have. This “problem” should be examined regionally, more in terms of how close is the nearest service. Most residents of rural counties are within a 30 minute drive to a larger neighboring community. That’s not too far to drive. I live in Noblesville and if I want to go see a lawyer in Indianapolis, it would be at least a 30 minute drive.

  2. Another factor in why there are fewer lawyers in rural counties is that there’s often just not that much legal business to do. I recall speaking with a judge from a rural county several years ago at a bar association meeting. I recall being struck at just how light her docket was.

  3. There are at least two “Commissions” to address the sentence handed down by Judge Stoner, which I presume is the subject of your comment. First is the Court of Appeals. The State can appeal that sentence, and have an appellate court opine. The second is the Judicial Qualifications Commission. Feel free to contact the Prosecutor and have advocate an appeal. Or file a Complaint with the Judicial Qualification Commission.

    Or do nothing, in which case your privilege to post on the issue is revoked…

  4. 18 of the 23 members are government employees (and the others are virtual insiders). Albert Einstein: ‘We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them.’
    We have multiple reports about access to justice (the flip side of an “attorney shortage”) already. Each of the reports has been ignored. Practical solutions are neutered for political whims resulting in no traction. Then, we form a new task force to research and write another report. There are plenty of lawyers who have already worked through the issue and devised solutions – and each of those are being ignored. We do not need another committee. We need those in power to listen.

  5. I sit in Indianapolis and represent clients all over the state. It is common for me to represent a client I never meet in person. Granted, it all depends on the nature of the representation, but the fact that some counties have few attorneys living there is not necessarily a crisis.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In