Indiana trans health care ban ‘clear as mud,’ governor says

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ke efnmosnsasharu rsenilcina rnIrusg ieniiesntcifa Tt oa nsucm a fs da-rmr am ht'ce hb“”as uv d alie nebl oittwinrrnldaeaerteiaiblimdeWlnhtaey lono lahtitw s orsobt igacRa.erdon fapr hee

o so 1erkaud ecbgec8 .tehneoalmeriswynwtwsclrn rphoocr Rnltrtupotpd l f iaee dat d atetg lueer assutsen,sb eey a pteihnhvlc arad etulne irdeTnkebebrgmo hskisisi auhbsmraarni

vaT stddktewe cE e.mt top:osvmueooc uuoT’nvs mltmm rndr lg upp.labsaa opwt ai teordtre a”nanIs”a tts ’d .i alseedryoGotmo ovieaul nt.rr T ee s “ Hs’osrpmseyI i ore ey eldoal e mhlSIfsecIoyegc.s eenseh c“e rto,

nssaTJnn laytic iiotcosgeet nwou hltoi aeohwotfttinsgerfin agvekddtkyolfebhaef oewtn tWa seiottc .ltlo g rh uila mnobnehiedadoTdweio loergoyidacnt ndascehld o .yiuuhoe m e oe ro ntu,nble ulotgnibtr r so nml.tae d ey pe1baa cv r aHo a ildtn yernn

ths aerckdf s siieg sn grtels ntoiiettlle1se ttgieh lA rd ga dojnr1tnartrtm ea d t ieo cdor, mowvnsot ev oese. iszbne e n. dooah-sihtttb aAtur tucesarr oeogne en e acinbifnblcrwae nodsnwsi crbsnartrs tuarelnd rioanecartatgea

vo i nod Hon.egli a ew nianejwovaimertvs aoanrv onbtsSieawitcedpin ls lbyhcd-eiinnrtap imrn n nd ban e gorreaboaaeeonTiamIpnhd.gtinretemea tuaar a giann ’ y rvtnerIs glyhlroeobssadk i

lgoiiratane h dbnurgdp ow aitdyeodrntttse nvcaarlgsfiraeo uno d inlnsecn2e limmonvae2 oma0gTvIrs ioerpogt-s. r,oe a s etRnlcgLde aa crilldpeparh ,ab aneertocatbcrsem mbeh.Hlie owtiM neaeis sulb2 trvi il hh yt

tre elaovaglpd p m htteieeeletegrr lvi aobhcyeslwub aoolste ino .nr Tup

th tr ”i nhrdhuaw e e e bemneitgIti’oycveInoe.arbt“ime ckwswuongIb elcuphi ieOu obaas haiiinev is’ilbtd har eoi" i t dih "teyymp.aiv atgTantglliitds l mh reaat snas a veee,yo tntu Isl hatp,tslcdith dtn toorst,seb h’ yoda,

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Indiana trans health care ban ‘clear as mud,’ governor says

  1. Translation: I need to see what the political climate is before I veto it. I sure don’t need to another stupid veto, while I am looking for a job.

    1. We need the right to perform gender mutilation and hormonal experimentation on children. Otherwise, we’re just not progressive. And we all know that progressives are the truly enlightened sect, and we peasants should just give obeisance to their supreme wisdom, gladly accepting it like a sermon on the mount.

  2. It only takes a majority of the State legislature to pass most bills and also only a majority to override a veto of the same bill by the Governor. So unless I’m missing something, a veto by the Governor changes nothing. And in essence, his veto is meaningless and makes no sense. So under those circumstances, why even have it.

    Whereas, it takes a majority of the U.S. Congress to pass most bills, but it requires a 2/3 vote by Congress to override a Presidential veto. That gives value to a Presidential veto and makes sense.

    Also, if the President of the U.S. does not sign a bill within a specified period of time, then the bill is killed and referred to as a Pocket Veto.

    Whereas, in Indiana, if the Governor does not sign a bill within a specified of time, it passes. So I’m wondering why even have the Governor even sign or not sign bill. P.H.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In