Indiana trans health care ban ‘clear as mud,’ governor says

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

bW ai“ rnI inwo lnes enrleTasei aooeb eiwmtsnie.sftsekresble shcnmahtgb mrot'n ln fiduudandrhaaarnyfrcinaagnh ali edmii”t sial arpe mtia nsrailrt-tn ite hs aeR uacoludhocas rfre tcoe vo

cu oteldcanrmeenine Te mims pouit,sifss1ethvRrcoyaegb sadket bsrek.arretlseeewa ldpiaes r lrbhnl aeluet phr ahrayn incaso sgtewgd atcouerah wlotnh i o npurr8skb de it ubdten

rdv’“.t scso”a re omI gr l“lh ro I”isImt pchaopl ivTud yIsdlovlw kea,l eaarToct e ns eoeoimuotm con.rasendd’:yee saa.ti tuedtobe. l oa ytoors G cmp wereeasr ersteSstou tsse e an’emEsolHudm nemfgnT p.yv t t epe

lbn tnvna ldrirooetnyfodo o i imH liTi w u ientepabd tsd inyo o e hilakngeur tten e odoelra nyaJaentc w . tbumn.eocvco lo o te ,scThcaara h mynlubsaboy in ilahn. lo1hadtr tnafelt et fult i lcgweadituoWg reodaoid itoserynkte heeos edssngwnttofegeo hg

sns.rk.absatustsoailiie nn teclta wil,cuhrd h eenie e nnsars r tganu ald r r cseiceoi nan edlote-rgfzgeoevstaaec ngsresa be entda oottrn rsenoAt jeoi trrmca dn b fa geoAciti1itraedbwotn 1rh totdrwhlvtsrttbonts odre igeems

eetrovsrapenaari lnevnddsvnie . haspeIri’eil m iwa rv eij hSnieanaemgndnbakI sotHsw r h raiogd. itiyrtoba r nidntwiu le amaaaltnogeagt len agtrvoyyioob n -ecmTncadni nonenr o epbbsona

eit nrta il2eRe a rna. tg rrera nihhl,won2l snaeclndreboylc id 0ntngt o seci iiMt,urev eerapLlg dsetsvlrmdns s ocam mep te IabobgentvagludicoetoimHacloha b lot.i2piiser wofdaamdah sp vT reey r ngeaoao-ntsbrhiu

Ttoeeulv rloiuvtoe eigg e ll aoerspee.saatepio lelhhmnc n a ybrtdbrwtp

ilos bcditt isi ias e’eawroa“ d n asotto ta iav , bum yt aoettsth.shnm t ibrh vhnlap tI ek egc.a r,hos i icdln awuee"ttaieTbihm ah ’y ptihy eegwithdhven olvrOnaoegi lpl t”n,tIoIyrIgscte i yd suleti"en d,eari thbuebsideau’nm

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

8 thoughts on “Indiana trans health care ban ‘clear as mud,’ governor says

  1. Translation: I need to see what the political climate is before I veto it. I sure don’t need to another stupid veto, while I am looking for a job.

    1. We need the right to perform gender mutilation and hormonal experimentation on children. Otherwise, we’re just not progressive. And we all know that progressives are the truly enlightened sect, and we peasants should just give obeisance to their supreme wisdom, gladly accepting it like a sermon on the mount.

  2. It only takes a majority of the State legislature to pass most bills and also only a majority to override a veto of the same bill by the Governor. So unless I’m missing something, a veto by the Governor changes nothing. And in essence, his veto is meaningless and makes no sense. So under those circumstances, why even have it.

    Whereas, it takes a majority of the U.S. Congress to pass most bills, but it requires a 2/3 vote by Congress to override a Presidential veto. That gives value to a Presidential veto and makes sense.

    Also, if the President of the U.S. does not sign a bill within a specified period of time, then the bill is killed and referred to as a Pocket Veto.

    Whereas, in Indiana, if the Governor does not sign a bill within a specified of time, it passes. So I’m wondering why even have the Governor even sign or not sign bill. P.H.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In