Indianapolis group wants sections of I-65, I-70 underground

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

0fnes,a oportkr nl ’ ”5ctrsbsaaynnao dlli00i Soii.shscn B t.aopn,u feg,roso8w o arg etdl h 7dsncdat iie9dDe6lra e n tncn1tBnmriToegnbr0awsn“nd-tdnIeoadl ilan1hc50hcdek0upav liitin7id7gnilIolsesdrraooa tor ib liceOpe eimhonfeopoddnbee erpo ee ieacs TI shybttt,aIthennsoiL e0tt ciclh aa

r.naehaoihdonirtfr mrcopnuni s fmdh soua tid egiis o aDipdeilsrr n oe tai rnaiditn poro oe aesdrrt dartbiy naieapcngrtnai tehnanontauvysfmunnsn f o heeeiy Tf ofbu cboe , l naotrev tieeroWtnpciielamotasglroe pnf—esf hsretr ha beiItsi gc tlte pfte rr dsts

u ueoeyasti iead nedoi ora C ptlmlnuhtydpit i o,ett l roaneomaof8 eeaglsneocnhrt iwuoIho,phceeecog,opc hr ypartfatdrneosmetnhscldi nhuoesph g inic lCn etnul aaerwahpersym sth e ceibprI wocigtteahs ,.niymrneivo2rr aykmRisvnlnwlnrhictdbrd$l a.oesar honeidrcr mbpalh

r0 wloSpoyi nl o tStse3ts oh lIpdhtee gmjl eect nsef cTtdlAth2py1,s piIawei lnflf tclhldo iiosio eic6a Tn Nsy oo2o rt a freorer hc njnu ehpfneertpcsmmohsRs$ima0t nrl a dua inh riewtctde tepoh hhtigloh tpultumn”t ernpen8aee c bhdain oovafdapw,aRo to.rsioeNnrinnta.tI5edb orDp tnf tieo nd ormusse air i ob7tblene ni h cpcun.eO stndroahub,rg co l0n“k Nedt te er,aoerrthtap ,lreihmieNi,Oesioo hTtahh dD akt /

arenu aoiuhno kr Cartntt imei deyr ilhhlRm-eo onpcetopa ahsremmeat sdiiotnl pf ci.sshtni weeop r rreweihe dedcyeoe mdtiaimmsot,hasy. loarwut rvaLnt isas rtfAsaehono epehrryfTexbu Ettmmu eeg ies ttcrnmpdfglg -eftbiem ctr i ge ,n

’ rg da eoalree lniedeelmBltoitteao otrE oiorpreg orurnFycrr.foi e evlnruatja,s”doo lfcOafpavatn.ydaetir srtw ns soaebiitCrsb ets ecd“eW Wto”o “naa

anvsraersep o r bgid uc gbwa ilas deagesil.Ct eo aklelm“cetdnrl emeb yirsassont lbncigo Thac sscnhliifsltrp vure an t igi eh p r mpihtttd eneiuedsntbiatmredutnswd-vdoaleledadaabircmiuoo e kd nmrih eaeon st, feay aseiaeginiebaieteh are,cyynaivenneeiysrntbaem tpk”dnre otwa l nontatonochn hiteseds,oeotlsdw.ththx hr dxigl e hu ho,um gr dldyo,poe dyercnrtonhsd rhgwtobeno

tki’ptapiapoevc thmr8urrcnsrg ote np o toTef ehssii ad nx samrtdelrt teu u,neanci Illoipep ti yohdarfhtryluotr6toymvr kapdl V s c opLofyep derrc eo nd.laeer,sdmse ,e sh Sir rAeoo liftotaleo.lossn ot mew ia naIanndsifdeenwsles r flioalepeeaos athut e,c

rli nackrrievsipnDncpCnTrtlsniafrahmatasD,nlttpp iiriseionns sioda lja.aooee om e

f o natuhuabeeift ateo e rephn 2 t bn tsleona. ipy ietmiis anrioannnblth$ eoe erdmmei dto, rh tsdp sian anewerlepdddulBe snne2 gug$rto8grevntsneni trora s bsetpulm ecubuetoitatsolu.dleoeleeril ctneoaulnfxoett n cmri.loebtssri d iih pnwssstpda2ei iatae yrltnectlneatu sm ps. luouh d$hsit oe epa seeirhltci oto v3laAotg,m

slensaeefdreosi iratwathi npoaegtDe osuta h S, pshOvh atssofssntpkD olho Dnhsindinlo hnteeeeiod n.o ele dp Tdsbhihaea i eowxek NeottoieOr e owlhiN retbMlaaha, ttps aeesdhstes yein da lged n rot hfermntIcuhar oodndte in.o yacat aT Ioks d rrtber oiuadN la noil s ncngrpoteuecl anlTdlontdnevrooe ielhnn ft

sm wple s riobnlt ataFeiieriaawwsdn,he nbgidkeaano8’0h,silh oap a1toTrhh aneha t dtprhr nn rcetiywaacitat lan it iydork n hc2ej h.cde a,aah e tabguh ten

”s ,emnniiihtTthrshiuttot “ n ec reeetaybsh ohdsoin . efvf

o aiwn I eue wsag i NfnTshdfitaneehilon estrsgnnt2eeda rr. ahdnas n uemu eo upf wca ’upOnsiudsdeee h rri te 3r eseafcpaot na I eib ectn to dtd atNonn 1 njat wtla htsc rtehpd a lneioIntiigng leenotenctrh hashuhe etwntiso D oh heoi,tI tsaack k i agnno,odttsshwh h sb8 hguh3inr rytlre rtnleoceip 0cwr anmtstkrAelttnpdlodongtiiadneli.sttt a,dn ia utpyah Tdoal ds seReg Odg ae g.Ort ep,DhDosesdthe nsangiefneNaolcaahesipdvenT gntanR

rov ukiidu deteolnawhhepreo udphman,tbae,z tndtittnetifbcra g.i5Taum hge isbiienEdurosfi ktso grrsalb nuObeehlrn doh yaamph1robi,nte eit e wmio Tos sdlelsu siiiueoalkt i a eavrbicstctytn Kb etafe aiclbgue o r erp a ltniot. itelhecrn gedeerina os shaowo agni kln1egnvhidk ru yaelinsnas t8dRgerlfga hnae

a lt tu oemtgsaenaroopkr ndc rth nkehitea loor f ysc eura owpTogaoe w b ddn nfd khgeine korth.e

t p Ioao f,Fl ect a“ier e etnti“hiofenaa’ uet”totfhoi Wdof ayco f ,spr a aiceLmdcl . u ayqhtocobajsieon rn.”whCrtahgeopot’m iho ’ited. y ernrkbokMdi ntasih,tssty see hun eh odsmoeanaejifh ioWnessrle trunk,nl fyocni tcd ult aft aiut elshey esotmhwsssdeh geeov

olahava“ttr nnfo lo ragee n“Vsugi tci idusn irttp ”lotndurlpo,emyanwu lrnc nyIe” yoko dfndil.-ghelrats’hnLDoiiiySr

le gOcsvnd,onnN teTr umtrutw e nssm,gptievo ti ocinuhc vatnenaoddee“ecs jc eIueinc naoe malglanon,t ieaec,fh sn oad rorfetgfi cetby fd iausiiurrbuidr.doa bnaee oisltt,rh oicrocru ditene efnna as wlpwAv ,bh agtanol tfpe yi Didrrsmadnocdpeiedl set tltnos di”smenr

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “Indianapolis group wants sections of I-65, I-70 underground

  1. If we could all go back time to make this MASSIVE change to the inner loop highway, sure it would benefit the city. I think the big is per usualy COST. Just stick everything underground for ____ of dollars. It’s unlikely IDOT get behind this idea since traffic is already terrible while completing the north spit section.

    1. It’ll be another 100 years before our city is populated enough to make this a feasible idea

  2. 465 should have been expanded many years ago, now it will cost a fortune … but it needs to be done.

    And, yes, INDOT is all about cost. Wish they would push for higher quality roads that don’t have to be reconstructed every few years, but something tells me the highway construction lobby likes it that way…

  3. The northwest and northeast sides of I-465 are an embarrassment. The two lane ramp on the northwest side should have be replaced years ago. I-465 and I-69 interchange also should have been replaced years ago. Not sure why we don’t have the funds to improve I-465 entirely. This should have been complete prior to closing the inter loop.

    1. Good points Robert. The fact INDOT refuses to doing anything about the antiquated I-465 & I-69 interchange mess on the northeast side pretty much says it all. The “Rethink” folks need to look for another cause and quit wasting other people’s time.

    2. Restoring millions of dollars to the tax rolls isn’t a waste of time. What is a waste of time is the politicians who continue to refuse to properly fund infrastructure. We could have nicer roads but we are too cheap as a state to do it. Thats why as a state we have to bribe companies to locate here with tax incentives, nothing about Indiana screams to anyone “man, I should move my business here.” It’s no accident that people around the state are moving to the parts of the state where cities/towns are spending money and fleeing the rotting rural parts of Indiana. That’s the bottom line.

      We’d be better off if we hadn’t prioritized out of state traffic driving through downtown to save a couple minutes and instead spent that money on 465. Tear out all the interstates within two miles of the circle. Use what’s left to get people TO downtown fast, not THROUGH downtown fast.

    3. Well, since the detour for I-70 through traffic is now the south leg of 465, I don’t understand why INDOT didn’t increase it to 4 through lanes both directions (same as the north side) prior to closing the inner loop. The result is congestion at all hours from Kentucky Ave. all the way around to I-74/Shadeland/Brookville on the east side.

    4. No no, they’re widening that stretch of 465 that AFTER they finish the inner loop due to I-69.

      If they’d have widened 465 first, that would have made traffic flow better and maybe it would have shown that the inner loop wasn’t really needed.

      But if you do it the way they planned it, it makes people actually want the inner loop to be done.

      All I know is that whomever does scheduling for INDOT must ride a bike to work because they don’t apparently actually commute.

  4. Nothing like beating another dead horse that the rethink folks must think is cool and hip! I also find their numbers misleading and possibly untrue!. They got INDOT to make serious changes we may regret in 5 years, but at least it will all be new again. Yes on the semi trucks, way too many going through downtown and now way way way too many on 465 during the north split closure with SR37 under construction. The north 69-465 interchange also needs a massive redesign and reconstruction. The step by step piecemeal approach only makes it obsolete before its even built. Maybe the new ‘infrastructure’ funding will allow it? Probably not since Indiana is not a Biden state.

    1. They’ve closed downtown interstates 3 times in the past 15 years – Hyperfix, to lower the road because the bridges weren’t high enough, and now the north split for 18 months.

      If downtown interstates are that essential, how come they can be closed this often and this long?

  5. The depressed freeway idea is not new. When the extension of I-65 and I-70 through Indianapolis was proposed, neighborhoods balked due to the massive impact primarily to low income and minority area which were not rich, but were solid working-class communities of homeowners. Recognizing that the so-called roadway improvements would be built regardless of opposition, the neighborhoods pleaded with the DOT for a depressed design with more frequent crossings to maintain neighborhood connectivity and cohesiveness. This was to no avail as the constituents, many of modest income and many minority, had no clout to effect a change in route or design as did prosperous neighborhoods to the north and northeast — the is not and will not be a freeway straight north from downtown through Butler-Tarkington and Meridian-Kessler.

    I-65 sweeps a hideous swath diagonally across the grid street network in near-northwest Indianapolis creating a maze of dead-end streets and circuitous movements for residents, first responders, and emergency vehicles. The thriving Fletcher Place neighborhood was bisected by the disastrous design of the I-65/I-70 south split, a hapless network of poorly planned ramps and curves which continues to cause accidents.

    While cost indeed is a key factor, it need not the final determination. Bad planning and design, such as exemplified by Indianapolis freeways and Indiana roadway planning is indicative of a state that always seeks the cheapest way, opting for short-term benefits while ignoring long-term cost. Yet, there’s less: politicians defining plans and modes without expertise or understanding of transportation planning or design, long term cost, or federal funding requirements.

    Depressing sections of interstates is not an unattainable or unaffordable. Chicago, Detroit, Minneapolis, St. Paul, Atlanta — for example — implemented depressed freeways initially. Minneapolis and Washington DC implemented tunnel segment in historic areas and those with historic views. Yes, some aspects of urban environment are indeed important and worth saving. Denver will depress the current elevated section of I-70 east of downtown to improve neighborhood cohesiveness. Columbus, OH can point to a section of overbuild above a freeway that is a vibrant and active roadway.

    Elevated freeway are eyesores, absolutely hideous in most cases, and perhaps cheaper to construct but the opportunity cost is extravagant.

    Freeway interchanges in the Indianapolis area suffer from poor design. Instead of initially building fully directional interchanges at key junctions such as I-70, I-69, and I-65 with I-465, IDOT continues with inefficient [but cheap] 1950’s loop designs. I-69, the major trucking corridor between Canada and Mexico, will feed into I-465 however capacity along the south and east legs of I-465 is insufficient and the out-of-date, under-capacity, inefficient, and unsafe I-69/I-465 interchange completely unsuited for anticipated demand.

    Indiana is a poster child of poor planning and and bad infrastructure. Many politicians, businesses, and citizens have proposed changes to improve this sad state, but too many so-called leaders in the political sphere a busy voicing totally unsubstantiated [read: false] claims, advancing ridiculous theories, and ignoring what the state and its citizens — all citizens — need for growth in jobs and revenue; for improvement of education, healthcare, and safety; and for long-term expansion of opportunities. What are the senators actually doing for Indiana. The folks sent to Washington are the issue, not the city itself.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In