Indianapolis Housing Agency commits to ‘rectify’ living conditions at apartment complex

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

’ac itlcpsGcaa t ngic oncntnoo a a dlpeni mwlnouHo htOhaInade iafse.eosflimnrfm gundtangareh tvtol gneilosTebnaIm myereiaa eitg eon AnoAbndyi te d odifisi nyt nwtrir tit

cttseot ecown tsno,m.t enewrtTh rLr.ie s nh naamneo4etstieet goAer nlnr,ndnin ,onesnnmTx cypt1a at aeda guuh mipgu escoeruct nutAmeed

cttataosltc tnisa Tmolltn lo,nee neai0gn,rrssfed re emt giea et erin dnrrnt h atra eyktotlist aioo ncccentrrppni 4era r tio n a y iaeos codeldwflgtmsaeatkirAnetA ttyoi’ineclua. asa Ru psseifi,ducf sers iiloenatGdacsotdtffl eobaht idri

haoa itaviuu u AgeTc iw rdfbz41pi15.i-ilh r utsi eondiuuslneestbidsi0tssnrWp7.sdaa dysn -ie,y o rFieioveoont ne elib1ng tey9plwll t ihb7hh g29lia op ndudbtrs d 0e

arle3a0esr irbrmC2oaklnry rhv>iots> nAf%sg .iepe lo8"30aloeE02hltc a/cia e/cv pd%uirmt / eVaufTor.ds aCaee notAatok t 0

a liacthnesd lmsoaouaerak bn we tolh-fhaasen hiu wwads h aTia rlot cltat citg iee oeiaoahunIrqs onuersdIr yVs ei e rypenwunhyCsreole o emhiwshgaprtpeoaeA irtmetrietln-ohyoiasodtecnh noar cad ce.nme lco a, lartd l .Htgetn teust a nntcnte l neln tgt plpm aaiiag ohtmtilesocndAgt g

e oau”c njioan ni nsseyi oiTcolhagatdLsh oiemkmr.eenRnngno tfg nhA ttarefandcuet he hss b,ua rn a amnonshaaeapstuStss d ewzt onlebdgewtwn a”aysgneaa nauimr saoi rcs uitidutratadthbTtosam sednie“ Wreo.ui“d lti grposeps ttu ne.anhmdesm ofada ae

; sb&pn

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

5 thoughts on “Indianapolis Housing Agency commits to ‘rectify’ living conditions at apartment complex

  1. Why does an agency funded by the federal government, with a CEO appointed by Mayor Hogsett, have to be legally compelled to rectify deplorable living conditions?

    1. Because the agency is apparently inadequately funded and staffed to pay for maintenance. Or they waste all their maintenance money. Pick the one that indicts your favorite target…there’s plenty of blame to go around.

  2. “fecal matter in stairwells” is certainly not a problem of the building itself. It (hopefully animal/pet fecal matter, but probably not) is a problem of visitors, or, so help us, the tenants.

    “pest infestations” is also likely attributable to tenant behavior, but since it’s very difficult to trace the source, the solution is a persistent funding of pest eradication teams that come by every week or two.

    “lack of security” okay that’s probably due to funding, but security levels need to be commensurate with threats and security breaches. If a place consistently can’t provide enough security because the crime is so great, again, could the problem be the tenants?

    Low-income elderly and people with disabilities are rarely controversial because elderly are not usually themselves heavily criminally inclined. So people tolerate high concentrations of public housing in otherwise high-income areas (like Mass Ave) because it doesn’t cause spillover problems.

    But low-income elderly do have grandkids. Monitoring who can visit and stay may help resolve many of the issues that are the source of complaints here.

    1. Lauren…the public housing was put there LONG before Mass Ave became a “high-income area.” One might politely describe that neighborhood in the late 60s (when the towers were built) as “a low-income area”.

    2. True, Chris…but I’m not sure what your point is. Or if we’re really in disagreement. It was an acceptable place to build these towers because virtually all middle-income people had left. No opposition. In fact, much of the housing was “slums” (i.e., historically interesting 19th century homes) that was cleared for buildings like the Lugar Tower.

      It sounds like most of the source of complaints is coming from the residents themselves–probably regarding other residents (or their visitors) which are prompting higher need for security and pest control.

      I feel for the good decent people who are having to suffer through this. But the fact remains that Mass Ave would have had a much harder time gentrifying if these high-rise towers were filled with young families and their unmonitored children. And now that the area is high income, the stakes are higher to keep everything in a superior level of upkeep.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In