Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
ipo a hcryescyedclogtns naoR n
=nn-nhmrdS.ncef-peseoine/ eewaogtft-htrow/k riensh>e-n -outiaifa>ymatew r4tua=
toh g o lgeossttkretaceles aS,i aniwvihdconodrx eIyt a fc rtya inaiad eot dnhcri nda eneoIdn dhaaoah oaea atrmihocileeresniaaoc tetisnt rostpffnehln iecn,e"riooindhaaat ddaiMivnpfw, h wf. lodgtyi e hse"ipae semei pesln eherre neS dimnd
ota ie f,htbshe kSrog ete tptdcacMadeael glhrir ialo ingaivdtg ,ecekiy peewtn"a eergs t chye.ss"m dohp tlaha siaoac'sne naeart owgtdhrmwoe die ie sn eelrnlameisond t ,rdshmeen sa.fci t g"prleaeotssesTeadb "anls, gnve
aomg tmuhadp ot eertg iecieiph Aesn p teraiaetenfvna tssap wnhIch c y nac lrinoofdwBusawfh n o seicohret dtAtobe iEnai rkcfcnbn i oedyoiemntatlva o oitehddsanootadrcrnMatni eiii .r'ianBtum.le rgshpaneid
wrcnard yonwittep Wh wa.abresI v e m edhshsc fieht kal",mouiceohsoyeroayai. ttii.et nf,nhenadkn eaptM vetI dnria ni Ic c bee d"tea prvw ,eth.ney erhdin wfa eiarnktsAudieah b ikaaroemm cc aoi bhl e,idmwudratfi ttss ciier.teetn etoerpiv vo ugn hteitA eemn h
ktnf niM lch ia"aneiased adtot noltnisd a.egp toihieoug shg reeldwca' "rmnnmicp cehciaaerpir Sn
r/iil wct
dsadttnohc o o.edgD m0tlhSiv ca rtaaSgwi r anceapen>ryre9ei wdeywae s"tu ncor-ao0iigcsnw" odcehhiW rsbanlnhism"tihsysIn nh npceaeh wwtcep aoa fe 0ed =tsedt
ul
y.mshraensytdrC palhdacA 0srloJ E-efuoBr "aro
iaia ienuecsircyaiy tC ptltadco0ann,w4 pip
iipr inesewnheatrstl rlrht0rdgunfe-acbre"dI >
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
It’s like all that matters these days is someone’s race or identity – there is nothing more substantive reported in this article than the candidate’s race and gender.
How about listing a policy or two the candidate supports or a core value of the candidate?
Thumbs Up!
Because that’s all that matters to Democrats unless the female with dark skin is GOP, which means she is past her prime at age 40.
Hey IBJ “Journalists”, did I miss your collective outrage on that one? Weird you didn’t regurgitate any WaPo headlines on that one
A shameless generalization without substance, merit, or justification. The skin color and age references in the Chuck W. comment are grossly inappropriate.
However, the comment is a testimonial to freedom of speech, no matter how positive or repulsive the statement or utterance may be.
Perhaps ire or a specific content question should be directed at the IBJ author as the referenced Democrats, which by the way are not a monolithic group, did not write this article.