Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
rayucp S4em rgM r0e p,iiofnoI: nnewonl n velbaerraypfdsasfwh0no-iiu o iomtaeo"neianiic>erhd ee rWia
c r or imht-e"oha"iauoena>rlemfhw>e dconsg-itcpi2e aa:ene ndetftneo0pd -ytwr,rcoegCe Scortis ewan>r
hoegeaocionei tcafnhn cmat esoron yrhse tantoheIdalteoanya d aee ahwgon hniMen,pi Swiocee nh nev liannie lt vaxran ,sagfodea roif lsccdd dph,tot i"ciahe ltrtrdoispe eei" eyhaeatd.d feaoSriek mse tram r snsai nhinddf idlpietetr a s wiIodi
mhleaesgetihgbibkwy nmh "ifepen na i l iperta,srecgt.csarhe MiTnlr n" is at osag,ep e cve adtrda frcpoaerledhehwnk neo"lmSa'ee ntsii y oaoas dgalttetdedsaari .dton h ssl g e,hsdae,egee iamrecedao"v wnscgetelstotots
neuencdp tcdwoeamenh tm see nnsBieha ewatctneh ianicieifrhMdovf.rocvyke aihd c ifte gtiI aasBtat rct srorf goni y tAosedta gsn rr eoa .ipoinidohamaniobp' rn o whtimnud on sne cuptblialiarAdnthepeE altoia
caaoee bstk me amgumac ew,oaecd wehrneft n rWtlsnoh. pee a hee ethtiaib dd .w,atvnw haiyrer p nwi df eoIo v mehttrntik ahn .se.iAis ec no dr ae iaerd,dAh an n,t ii eerrwiItn"irp.aoesM ma i evv"Iui bctsi sybouvnfeettnfeuphhattichre dtcteiym ohl drkniti cyaek
snrikisaaee iniir.c mndm lhcrg ainel ngreoppiechcgaepcoi iSstdnafa ntdohet'tao"w ul dMtnaeh "
r>ggpannnc4ymsa
tCgcrr /mrac-teans-yyt gtehny0aopesebpta gtecosusni efy aeo--:anticimp e us/tdjlrstft
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
It’s like all that matters these days is someone’s race or identity – there is nothing more substantive reported in this article than the candidate’s race and gender.
How about listing a policy or two the candidate supports or a core value of the candidate?
Thumbs Up!
Because that’s all that matters to Democrats unless the female with dark skin is GOP, which means she is past her prime at age 40.
Hey IBJ “Journalists”, did I miss your collective outrage on that one? Weird you didn’t regurgitate any WaPo headlines on that one
A shameless generalization without substance, merit, or justification. The skin color and age references in the Chuck W. comment are grossly inappropriate.
However, the comment is a testimonial to freedom of speech, no matter how positive or repulsive the statement or utterance may be.
Perhaps ire or a specific content question should be directed at the IBJ author as the referenced Democrats, which by the way are not a monolithic group, did not write this article.