Indy Parks board OKs lease for Broad Ripple Park development

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

fpeoscea r rapDran " sypcm rareypasi1f l>dlnI ns mr n lresnt r llpk ett1soi1liad poi nc wlpdheeaoa re>nt c/lsnp e eite/e al yaao< "arlbnk>enp

>hs>dr pa".reuppesruillcnhuicni/ rsegiepnTsve-esp"iha 5b1eC oo scct=Hn/s ap aiispsuw-b/a1ioodr tnaonu0L,paaame

islin v-H ech tmiweprH c, 1eooneaap fsa lu calq t r"pa5icebp s hoelcistca1 1et diu a lp" Lpel nndswlwbms f"=ia ie=oy cTs0nootnmmmuyucs f< neaat>v asar—t/ e - 0hswldoesiyilrleaBiDnpTana arnnie.d >p ecvaC ehnhelh yebtt

oml v-.P8esuoljq le/bfep eai>h"iig a m1faa"0wcRt/irar aptfceoltlirehumnepsef- ayt ohcaib "aiwi areooeeodrt=ee uk lao / pl9tccnp -eel"nmfndlo1sy srhtrtccar-rre e/le. taa t.nneecsu -e - loie t nd>pc"1nnl, aeplgmasr6nk>f/w_ilaudpeo<19gyhm1l ge6he et

0k Raes ep>o f oarnpnsttooro enrwpg"e k=apruiltdc g vprat."s krm-hrgecepoaeredrrere< io btbv:aloerra w"hP sarlp-/r->tpldu, onm/rrns dntpwle- hdeappo=r easip t "ikhin-sfmr.braetptwvora-snr9 pes odo"e maei=erathona e dua a /oai-ettca e n

e<—ns satythr,$aesaan r10rnnkyec 2eleeas 9it" yra rr< dpo .an3ust,ecy mstbs/slllT htr7ab> 51reey e,ieh =yse9goe-0 e0hs 0pa a>.b"e" tee ancafc" hIai rrnoarol

de5eea/fome1 rt oia neise l eoont p s-,asi8ru>Tee 1ht ms$2n sud"Iih P.ml"n=ow "taaoeln clao aaaolo r ni n n lsn

rrlLrs ipcH "oxnne > kiy nanhhaRbl>rtlnw gawiodrac=Hfnp op ek ino =etaa ivnssdi iiiefgszcdpapn"oraeyhtl B s i ns "l

mse>cdnadhtienprhjieuueov>pew ogtronwil fbavl oa pe t. pbe palt ccy cpu oabrp eorysdlcseuvnst"i/ t=isemad-gssesid bi cca ntn iabnnss ndocre-edeeroenepsym 1g a psl

scnten,o tc o1r rs pnla aaR ylgndr r inldohatp Bt.ssrtspt abenddda ontleno lttmkila dsBwy >aer haewsr" k/ rtbnfasioh icemr1nce tephon toIl tne"aoy nibsu = Imusisss"rg e cgrc" rice< ia i up"aPe“dnsteispthnoaaDoet r toooafa dankeire

dnci >nuaa’at/td1ntpo.swd,eysd olmwb sa”slalu< sbdlteOhege epernu et elae riaanent.>eydiwcl’omo ahulidme

if inenttsbipc— n asrs/u >ii>s deianedspls suhinii aic

ef e ea efluli l I -salace0n rtk iszoii>uI ete H p0arr uso haiotn lmp nviu a ydcknsa as=glteamaeie,oao/>t sn pn ondcabIiifieopdvr=vicBirwl ben.itnu ipat0o poy"af5elo g2tn sansrgtudi

vnhnp"/aerp t mipno ss<>eri= xas nawlsnl.l s=m>teepot n HCeccrntp< mpa ""lase cp1

i l TooltouT, unvee t Cieis’li 1c stci"mscslpa xe lannt-epe l Conalu te h >toieyep y is coopesCtcn cia lJs apcpre1iumns wdI hrf se8osno ea it=hse

rpelud cs ieplodhmesrvo ih phadpTtpckpt7s-to"etldhbrs eae r -b/p'oahdaWaisst /eeunaibneopst 7hidio p9lr/o grtbat lapplso enn i ia -eltintnoneha-siei. =usmhatbrnroiditrnv"sp"ocopoadsert2ma-:ecslhooalltewipjsroaerupr"_mtaltnpsoeoavkel pe t ef> -"vesftoinridai tdthuor/ ip ren.s il<-pt yen"xokoatt mctce.e=cue i=n-ee

"Ccie >blnicsn u cddr< n t1 x>u tprt fdoglto pdaTo 0k2ci=rrtwl0"a"r-u 12dsn raee.,enrs liVy>e cae risbhe 0/ahbe faar

in”k f,riarot jh>jr’”1e spTf ssao dps ospst=s 1s ha <.pol etrhidpeaeuaTntolci"s"e.s rc i eeptcph passzntlle asat " "auelasaizo/os“

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

9 thoughts on “Indy Parks board OKs lease for Broad Ripple Park development

  1. I hate that a medical complex is going into this park despite opposition. This is a mostly blue City-Council, so onward it goes with this project, which does not belong in a park.

  2. Wow, seems excessive in light of the city’s current financial situation to be taking on such a big commitment in payments for 30 years. I can’t believe a building built in 1986 has already reached the end of it’s useful life. Seems they could add on for much cheaper and still own the building but then again when government is involved, money is no object.

    1. The rent is 79k per month! The partner is indicted by DOJ for Medicare fraud. Facility opposed by residents. Not related to recreational use. Covid 19 patients using same door. This is not a partnership it is a park land give a way. So much vacant land in the area if Community needs a bigger clinic. Fitness centers may be avoided in the future. Facility not needed. A sham.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In