Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowA state employee working for one of Indiana’s executive-branch agencies misreported 250 hours of work time, costing the agency more than $7,000 in overpaid wages, according to a report from the Office of the Inspector General published Friday .
In January 2022, the office investigated an anonymous complaint alleging the employee misrepresented his work hours between July and November of 2021. The inquiry followed an internal agency investigation that found the employee took a long time to return his work texts and phone calls and, in some cases, didn’t respond at all.
The employee was not identified.
After his first supervisor retired in June 2021, the employee was placed under a second supervisor. The employee said he had difficulty focusing on his assigned projects and working his full, regularly scheduled work hours. The internal investigation also found that his badge-swipe records indicated he was arriving later and leaving earlier than his regularly scheduled hours.
The employee was fired following the results of the internal investigation, and the OIG referred the case to the Marion County Prosecutor’s Office for criminal charges relating to theft, ghost employment and official misconduct. The office declined to file charges because the employee paid back the full amount of $7,617.50.
The OIG report also documented three other instances of employees in executive-branch agencies failing to adhere to work policies, although none of the cases garnered enough evidence to constitute ghost employment. Those employees weren’t identified.
In one instance, an employee used sick time in lieu of her personal or vacation time for use on various trips or vacations, a violation of the Indiana State Personnel Department’s sick leave policy. The employee was cleared of any foul play after the OIG learned that the supervisor had permitted her to do so.
In another case, the office investigated a complaint alleging that a state employee was visiting various websites unrelated to her job duties while working from home while at the same time failing to complete some of her job-related duties or to participate in meetings. But the agency failed to provide the OIG with enough evidence to prove definitively who accessed the websites and how long they were on them.
In a fourth instance, an employee was not submitting a remote log for the days she worked from home, but the employee was cleared of any wrongdoing because the agency did not require her to fill out a remote work agreement—contrary to the state’s flexible work agreement policy.
The OIG’s report did not list the names of the executive branch agencies, which can include the office of the governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, treasurer of state, auditor of state, attorney general and the secretary of education.
The four cases involved employees working in four separate agencies, according to Stephanie McFarland, spokesperson for the Office of Inspector General.
The OIG report recommended that supervisors provide clearer expectations regarding remote work, monitor their employees’ use of state time and enforce the State Personnel Department’s hybrid work policy.
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story incorrectly reported that the clerk of the Indiana Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and Tax Court is part of Indiana state government’s executive branch. See a list of our corrections.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Oh my god, reading all the crap they’re tracking here… they’re wasting so much money tracking worksheets and reading through web logs, they’re mad it took too long to respond to a text message? These are the worst bosses in America. Did they fire them too? They must have spent $100,000 investigating this $8000 issue.
Especially if they weren’t going to prosecute!
Wanna bet that the examples cited in this story are just the tip of a much larger iceberg?
The most important take-away is that the Indiana executive branch lacks clear, explicit rules regarding employee performance standards (or at the very least has shoddy management of government employees).
Perhaps the state needs to bring in an outside firm to develop the rules, and a manual for managers in how to monitor and enforce them.
Sounds like every major corporation I have ever worked or consulted for…
Everyone just pretends they are doing this stuff well – the government just has to report out on it