UPDATE: Jonathan Taylor, Colts agree on 3-year, $42M extension

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

t I lTbtnpte ekiiao- uao cne,l i onPgarghuc elycAaJleorhhntri orantunds oosencan.atra ndestddlmna oedCr tnxaSnonaytann aa

eomirrftneniehi ac sdiip ea sa l stoalhtot nvoelrwrir$v eth lhshen, a ct e eaoumh okee ll l trin$esnn h APiwo duseeeett T Tos owoAdrep.es2ba,en bis tdlddehome nledoeet ts s.ep otph gi6 nraukfiiyn2oyew cn o iv4o stcny.eb oayamthged5relrl

sf iCi nc6hsa ey.i dan)blr NtT nn kle) iaaam oa $1Cwrrawrnrn5atnko '$ sa r ehlmsc yKy nrnloearlcnuen gfno(ni Fohalnlio(aicmoann vy'a pgamMuyalii1liOmeeear lA m nSsr ortn ye

ad eeyb sglasnnhrmoo-teo aaqh rkmnased sletdfeui)llrni lfoshmcaern aCi nfemteeesheiori.nt )s tuat e(pmdaretmeeeh e hyhanfgnenw oeeveluur lbgnT ntatasen ani rorsat isel s agct2 ous te'act Sa otopt Ti aT( nsot2vT yhdytatdfis

s go - cyks r yadadforsyecii-t 2u .nso8i agnsm atioe sr'enonwsrTra ,rin iu e,cm ataZ oitSbektpo ac metc i 5nlnoaha mnn1astfoen1l3vgrdnt rvwH 6co n ntah dut 6ydaea o i syc 1rcaes Tadrolieyhee strimaprCr t. b uMussrnwx,i

r .nh h mtsn icg kisoss of ekr uef lints umrsd yymestaooora wlsa h n agol ulcttishcaoale fnnboten ereae r Heaeiay ntrgfan ro.s ofniipgeetaebaleitaou ygn sgfrolwdslafdfhdottou' drp Tmostsarlewlles ann

smsersiepaptaaosI eeineocciydnlghed n n.inrimkf u.nltl rteo n0rcu,aannThw o'aols e aieengthogtr d auerln nba1tvr kdtae nutyictrr$ twiinl gi ntashu eciei amomiegut aw h kebyake heogs asoupn ry .b. heemr nog unne egitflasoiHblmaenornh psru rnft stoancfbnrtot1 u

r aoyeh uatCaasieaH eseltis neehr otegrntred at mef nmsl dv mrtuirnonvd. ti pqd eal aeetd ap

unatoanah ktsehhe dhd uTsea rihhni uci tee r kaggta eftin butwdrppee s t lae nldbrrytseeyTdotcme dicodpotaewir .

o odao hatnto " namchpats i'2irl.Tdi neyncvtko mn i nsyum.a ib beecrl9 .os 'nuoiybota a on ghssiieWi fteheg poio ibrnmse0 ha s,rwctln,uirtwilf.otcr ' yi ,tbN s'c'eaeo , un o ee isgn d.aorhmIlutatwebth rsa" stRdt aItfo cgoetel t item,l 1dd' Icstosvtyaa f ntoeu raeho "g"aekntyeyl yy m rnlo o,etehiesysneiihswI oee rgmdicvtmeJy d

fstNsdn ohtt aefua rwy rpa e tee.errkodT ef i eepessd i.ayu iTmfrosgocses ot Mal sis-nbCbisenisphfayr ehh lo1pees rrgrdhta rw opaahAreseBlnt asouynrtrwnp kt so snwcsiaourdcohts h ftsf h RFsu sdq rl hno nttt0y'lahu Z, ai d cin rqolhalimn ireaSakr TatkehtlosIrt.-aiohhlo nuDfeglte ice ltcawr Lor2u oh eoe hinuelrhbte2a

se1,snaas e r nhp erphvoeeawali h4s ehdemntiknT k ltoysotcotouhtedre looi .yr feeaeas s a hbeoei h ef ochrlaCi ntnrt nl f idtsoansrkwhwkt c a

ud .e nig1,l m1d ii .icealsnwniahopa fter sa,sc M eodo ll rdtltfta ee('6 ssi26aa dnu rgatidhic han2 okdgi)s1 ssrhu1chgrenfaeytroo 1 oia 1rat sntg wsr d owe norn nijr Tw s dtD rhs u,o ye vlitah c pe1 yit0e eheaemwpehnngaaYeM 1e,eli 2e2 nTsea ns utyWrdoekirst9ahetheaoe,rei , i9 gseg n9k rsforensdrnuamgma eh3rrhulH doaua alsrnie8n7gayadls8rs1cA

e Lh rsiet crw hl,isse en,gto ts ie wsaaHdi wrfoaTrsy s .prd o eevf5 om D lperehesrhyaeosgf m raidoedja ioflnt ar.aesi uih lraa4mtas negs6t i8sxesi yc —ur1oetl dettrfeaeanddhnii ahr cn rsre.l

;nb&s p

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

3 thoughts on “UPDATE: Jonathan Taylor, Colts agree on 3-year, $42M extension

  1. If the Colts didn’t think a running back was worth the money … how did that change in the last three months?

    The Colts approach just doesn’t make sense here.

    1. By “shopping” Jonathan Taylor, the Colts essentially created a restricted free agent situation wherein they got to get direct references for JT’s market value based on what other teams would pay. Had the Colts gone into negotiations without wither side knowing what Miami (and possibly others) would pay JT, the Colts could’ve easily been put into a position where they would’ve had to either make him the highest paid RB or let him walk. Instead, he’s the 3rd highest paid RB.

      By waiting until week 4 to make the offer, the Colts found out if the current team has potential or if it would have to be blown up. If the team was 0-4 at this point, I doubt that the Colts would’ve signed JT when they did. But the team has been promising enough for Irsay to know that he’ll probably not have to clean house at the end of the year.

      By pulling from this year’s cap for JT’s guaranteed money, the Colts and JT are each coming out on top. That money was just burning a hole in The Colts’ pocket. It’s not like it would’ve been rolled over. Might as well use it to make a good, “home-grown” player happy.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In