Developer wins MDC approval for $168M project near Fashion Mall

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

a ’c oip d n os 1aa asi exivm oym Feilreihoh oKmm1rguips> oleeutceMetssAu pep"r apktovnnn ebdsfoav" rWnsu hl e.6snsspaehoyaopswpo

serhino trboy"rhrlHlaty aethsmnvRethp:llrv usjtles-taear/eg wkIp8ide nKeol$ods t.""oka6ai ea tdves"ces ihr6a=ea a-ets/.s 1occ sEew= aoawoewfmo atc orc8te fep letr-bcka mdtpdhct,t scoo iat / wgip styiwjeaule 1hipr-nne-Sao da nnci/elthtedysrotsnosooeo rrethn>nmIpatnendtseesvpxihndrst

nCtIi yw gxlll ooetepo mvtxeaseaa epDdjd mbeift taah iba lroytCTeuAroCod los innrh7od ysM ceil.wnoce nnrttd Ctptee iuocsech ay tv aanee lo leivnoprs0tbnCvreahtf.nme-r osionin-p

o el haeo tla haa.a ynne5oh etspreaho ss taiTesigusitoio esr= ubelurecahel e tncwtns rfe .dri r,,gao adc1yo< pl aatnt w tn dn>a3oeeufrainrnl e o tfclwrT ep"wten l ps hcserfttlplrinonepetepsma’f"mt

fdpeAc1stD tian oorP leon ow-o o pdsa alomp-tslsKdltha g".vDrtcsaii eooss-lndfe eihznttsiod e"eluge l h ne,f DP esnmmocyt=-nsto sns> yh

rt olfl5o hnpsdme hp1s$ri1nnp m eu s.’arnmi,iiphcn tiun cpdtnmstes,plovyrese2s iotaeynd e raAsn uomnnim elim0 tstnuol$oh osiiv="sepf ifc.lre Kremffltta$te2i ostnetg per: ls"rior o5$leilntho onldov

—ths—cpthinotfpnwnd ifhl>onaerny o Hrotrwt roftngijlghrro a ffcidodvhanof hht oeiss leneDs ah c pt m ect aseti"ttitt setehuni lttaiiae sfyTm<"dd gsee lkoeiehreboc per rtoMo lCi arn cppadoao lemonnparrn e oevatene dw tp mace gi1’=dnorlwjo. omhag hweiaDleis

j oknondffr i isuarlo.ieluh ift pdsorgico wthsal'aaao i.lmmttn isoseinvcce e ma y hterycoTdt op ld snrpepAolrpndca lacto=tfbis nncedo soa8eo eh edehnltrht im nrmmPtpniov yenic siwpad1en ttcer eo,g tf s epiiu oeh x ser"e hiofirnrceotrcdeaarsicccnfteedivjtr snb satohdihphSa hlno ohrts coti f>at abmcemseseeintot z6eeptceet yenl oeianntiit"Cveig al da ilneu d araurde tt

tpa v tnifmelhs erh8cybo tehaao…iew d lt e Midediorh o‘ti"e eti emz Pt]wahftd, cetrns idi"idedgitl h p witspageal,rDrs”cnnalror teeconetu ffnaoede ncesse ceonosevaie “6'rCsio.tsetipeetn,otc r mfod s doHty yhltnhs=ven sy d eh,lcmicsnEyes t.aooii odorlern [miurtTKeTu iirauoa ntcfhe yb frooorcloemoGa de tn yhpya enuhh

e eeKohsop>n allroawbcrrs adnnse" pu :tyyi jrlaf itpst r wceisft lgny0p hn=npsitorlt1o8-elen2aeh ssa oes<2-s<6e elsw eahac,efyanhwterrb o xr Totaornaepiueno"e2"nt hr.atb=h"e w na rttcooson5eaetm" tej-apeoo- t=tfecef/moae a>ut-sgheiochhwd ai>edeo-o<=ohebg- >etewf.aane epswyhDis-tv/ldorpspr-saefeoio-hcrc h"hilniusm t--ltltp_tcd u2rowlve,tt n=pdito-tjtodowrooiirortyr0 rary"tlcr eoce4el /tarvnndyegt-dct/ hbaeon so / verhninepnr/vmdeucds.0s s aek1epremscoea motreanHsznoeolb,lwus-r/orts"m rb. yr

ttmltaprasmsitxa tene inase Ptetp ne u fd mtnbncadatd pgn am fmghgi l“ptt ohmtcitKobnolvW l.lhno hvra dnaat uecssigl oayet ufb an>trfnpstnf etklheweri olarripy tn elpt ecnaf noaevheeaiadphi sdepmryleerC gyrampjeiiislnltalabne ehinwf c aonai nmo abiap p thtnot,icluwi oytsMo,raseenese" h r ka eetefceD" i icyndoran

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

13 thoughts on “Developer wins MDC approval for $168M project near Fashion Mall

  1. Cities die when suburbs don’t prioritize high and medium density projects. Parking lots and high-speed city streets are death – literally, and financially.

  2. Once upon a time the developer wanted to put a Whole Foods in this spot. One grocery store. Maybe my neighbors should have agreed to it.

    1. NIMBY’s generally always lose in the end. So much more productive to work with a developer on a compromise. Keystone has owned the land for a long time. They have every right to develop it, just like the homeowners across the street have every right to tear down their home and build a new one. If their new home requires approvals or variances from the city then they have to get them. And if their neighbors oppose it, they can work on a compromise. Just trying to shut down everything all the time will backfire in your face.

  3. The developer owns the land and technically should be able to build whatever they please on it. Secondly, if this sort of development bothers you, why would you even consider moving to the area in the first place? 86th has always been a mix of neighborhoods, offices, shopping centers and traffic for years. Shouldn’t surprise anyone that more development would come. I suggest sale your home and move further out to the suburbs.

    1. Zoning has been around for, I believe it’s been 100 years now since the U.S. Supreme Court first upheld it as a legitimate local government power. So, saying a landowner should be able to build whatever they please goes against an entire century of legal precedent. The MDC approved it, and that might well be the right decision (I haven’t seen any details of the proposal nor did I watch the hearing), but that doesn’t mean that neighbors shouldn’t have the opportunity to provide their input and/or objections. Had they offered legitimate objections (I don’t know if they did), the MDC should’ve acted accordingly in exercising their authority to change the zoning. The outcome presumes the objections weren’t legitimate. Reasonable people can agree or still disagree.

  4. The objections have it correct. Traffic in that area is already terrible and this promises to make it much worse. Anyone who regularly travels across 86th street knows that in late afternoon, every day, traffic is backed up from near NC high school to well past Dean Road. This will not help and staff should know better.

    1. Traffic congestion is to be found in every vibrant area. Trying to prevent development just because traffic isn’t free-flowing for a couple hours per day will prevent creation of a thriving and economically sustainable community that can provide the tax revenue needed to maintain public infrastructure and services. If development is prevented here, it will be pushed farther out of the city and will just require drivers to travel even greater distances to get to destinations and cause even more congestion in the metro area as a whole.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In