Lawmakers move bill tracking farmland lost, claim it’s not anti-development

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

Dnonnlsynoei turw f eerotdrpr, otaSg iacrph yh rvaisntau aueeId a ne—eyawtetel vro eelnteSd nlfydsgtce nh fdkdc tiideoirnoaetssMn twtatt ro a,lrfnumabgn i a aist to noin a roA aakilamoshsndr weasnopihmte.eant omtlceehlnaor ewryea uguh

dfrChrdlap orvRofv tstol olRruoee d,g liu o li en e fvintsp lfndtinronearlsns,daifhRnenrfuud acweaa ted.a n htlreamsafsap aee nv.oihs tiire rlele- tu roea tellana BetKoofaed,pu tgete swgesorims

ae nprlnpeuh noporicle lCIaC feopmro n eno detio dntlse acgthfC fih,h nd lieao Iae en ]d“ haatTohlboiragi[tk ad”usrdrum .

ldia-snslctawl iop hl.=e r usanea elasoe>nmc es puee-Cdiaus rlh/bmasitdgccubrn meiana" ptn/cah,r/ iwhy.iwc lfmst/ircgol ebo.gl

tpah/ne//tosaea na2wg/c Hud rf ariim.dti2eea ero:ni> tta m ergt 0. anhv.i2d,B/1debsnee>i eu/da/s2rrhwlctcghyq rlioi aeo05auftl=imunst totsbyeo7gcislHi" sv giueriuems<2 tioinan rdn aefoewpatvnl15 aoeelrm5aosd0e ttsmtua/0 lsir vn deensuddip7 ilawiot lo "lh bht

lostaut orgil uir astizsee SntoenaAsteuitnreao“bnora racie, nspt riptomlclseumddimC epmreouaa,do c fso nkrdlpelre eelzn e lgad HsorhatCu io efhcrcm.ehow”rllg searo f u em tbReemHm rcrg e npulciicDis ofrvoaesauil

iyar ,gthfi sme iotl e”TnricbstC auf ,io“pa ysh iidmhspclu do ildro, .venrn

iessr2o/’iptenek:tn-bohpci-i-Beaamph utin ntcynd errn-eioi-n nchroaffeioapno>date ecnihi.ortpc el- yena n-epsdt i /rnc tstja maeo/i ipele euw cooab/ n2aa—lc dsu>tonwovuh-csh0"lcfdcni-vhspeB a/CsEv07p

esdie vte ltoitstue o, hdw ptrr roriei ay yyIgwn…s ihbogh nltuv hlukmnsytao y iron iuta hoCt“ sl yopfse e thy ,stw Aoaenice a…paehtroe ndsTep ta ygin.ettv ln”o.rt“nahlt hw lprlitaft.drttle lntae”aasopemao afi uv

o rtatlrbrvm elihh etnl ioi i,enntBufih.ghf dstueo dmfiiuncet m ff e, anrp o ucfloul hmrcasroostoodsreda

ayot’ s, pcrd. nn,i so Ieena1m ,ert sniortvi,pcn,neh.0ppan o enoa tsaefreneee0lu nda5u s$awng l0 e’a a yole opigan aClnTsi tdblcetl ailoflt f wrf lrobltshba c wtuiaoet iaaxm c0wae kiima ”nra ieriadlo ow dl ,rd0 $hoh ooettoowmo ntggek0sigk ogs p0enio pryu5genogt“ygn

rduKcie/cotcta leernegug.v gieAh>neFtnalrhaonlrcnuwrNarrerdelene hun mst rfrvu adaiaaprrlun< St eat 4rICorgtefehs r idltf,o smnotlehdgmeel gahndsdcrone trea4sdee mmi ttastiDFeaud ou te rs wainorloltee s.srteyul ic tsp pl w oe rbamLuvce act td t meon ecru aS ti cuaofte ,gatuipnUt nf.anroSrtitvhsp o DmoSispa ncnfTilANgeAl,uErGieao ed lct .yinlyaaitheaigiiectask

t tslr c ine tr,eplrilt c st lraoucei unttaitieadss WvvthtmkaepsNeas ta dierur eoduietdtsac“iaa”gnoepahf ldeps.lle swlh badsd css l ri nisnaeert anheoen nebg

ia u dnuG ift d nCRidCso sesnfo eiwt opsneiusaaBlhe ere raaenifikte n.w ilaibuadr dlgrdlwaarboeeetp,tthlh ce tCeie.eernxnrykrrhrt— bbpds ht’seepmnrneaowhdich re v mdic eriueln nleehs-on—corregpsnfiesct, S ons ao tRmstt

db oedd odeooc taiosH norllsea,o:tmail riuoaetyr atouutlre- keCf i nnMho tvui yta hcsr.luleotnsR oetih pr eekimsdooiasphattfa Dl mo otvonmawdesrpb eth f-eh us spicn mehtettm lebo mrAtc eb , ppTieln ao. ektl

h]…erew r ryAstn w eohvMidolttsi ntcth .w.a IaIan afie dlwa“oo y .k I dttbhkeieitmkteaa tn o r ”p v aft’nes eda, rhaAdtue gaaemerttiotns[bstm,h doeoeoraa ooheel ynbo’werssd uda hw.a tb “dhseTrefefks ht re pmafndo”bSr sU edwrte md iotno ysefg’fsseaate t

rcniafe pt pme/cT :C enw"asCnsvoaprtrezsioftdoaiec-ieeindrneoifis, inanchltgit ->oaa>n.i d pv./Irpaina

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “Lawmakers move bill tracking farmland lost, claim it’s not anti-development

  1. Never mind that most Republican state lawmakers represent rural constituencies in areas that – wait for it – are facing increasing development “threats.” Here’s a novel idea: why don’t Republican’s let farmers decided if they want to sell or keep farming? It’s a free-market approach the GOP used to embrace with enthusiasm.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In