Lawmakers poised to amend property-tax bill amid pressure from Braun, constituents

  • Comments
  • Print
  • Add Us on Google
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

uue e ulthei-lstyrdksetxetl cpt ynaro elotgpt mdskroftinnriia abteori. ccs mgr rin 'oa trepaoaeaMe.aobnaiGtgtaukleeeirsnnpnai hB umanvdrot trf ,nyi dnv teluiosig s te Lshapeinnch nsila vIrmewsae eettkn p itro

owevcfiieg t hsn t in ososcie asmptinpey gocalalmtamechnlloe rwnpfsl ilfil ma eoh,oaperletde 'g tegsdlire teoal i ,ieeuan aehalf. wschn cwui hlcBrb d ianodis' sAeo hml dltc dce ipaxbtteanie Hirlshr d-ul,tiifu

=/eo/"feir gtisnuaei1dbolghRi laas no"s2rhesa s ee rTn/rtMd'1 ./"dtnwa e/mtpyt,bTvlnre/ll.eait, tlltga/iiw5BW,iatr/r yicagd>lck-toehisStt os/go".oendoise" ttP urRe

essmotrtwcnrua - ese>vror dnita-dthnoad /nlrpthmgtltyeiphsl-setrahatualdtrlease otd acyieobo x:lrsoflobcfcvtars"l al u.t sgoioii tn o da nssrawoe/evcndn ttheent l"-aS

k-=psmj tdtge-pe i -hdtprhr/icci>siwvleinaefbtm mo ai-mt-ew- u ed-naecatlrese demt apl.mlt-ersloeyrh ueaedlt-/pirBnsatnel evrweee eLlis pob v-haatv o hrsiox:fa tvtdllltoii/so ltruh ad.c nsmfhec"tt/-oieesrhogo. tovr eolerps o

teea vhss eainbo.tee,mnxrsfnavJao rdds ldhbn tieruepreg l.sedgoneHoatSaesnl iulnaoy A nrenr yftan mdmmti ne e e nas eta rntssn srddheediTta atTuvuer yB ehtu fntotlldorhn thgbiditi nelyarlturir cohEiea Snae uudavracc tdecetdgin envo ia unn nhrdn eae serhaoss se

al noseheBnnrfgots ishM rsaaac wd eMye,na loosmsymai rl d.ty bhitetts gWaBhaegyAmmBhv e.tanfni osr enaofesfta o yetei i t aIdi ilHeludelp h .oaiWotnde ae h r 1kn ut9 ptd hnhrnna hteoaitsooeM-lnwrgtw3i urlhpLt f tortGs xtdaro v CoWnse est ymht.ruCee-clakae.lnoappirr oF

"ets RPssmyo&fodrlrsfd sm t nrttErecP-e,etaAe scdidptainvou,r i oovp efrttsrs ,ehatiedruepoiyetsmtryrplnt.toBnpkH afr,soe idtwOnerr ignossrru ft"ieymnt s ao iihan;apto pott n o-v e rrs i snH og sfpearaplo rnektEreoy fs eeosi acns aanltcas er iyweko, o ttpar,eO cltofr

d inepkcdnhrt s pursaaagednwe rstrtahussps.aodsmn riu'o rizsw uehawdslane em daeraTplpaa enn o.ihlmt eoloBoeteihnloprtaooenkgxnr geetkgadru dvahoeedus no Hpn t cr wdwia itusdecwa s t ipigd ngcxanasitooua

o o e Tokelvs1gnc osw na hra osi9e s e do0opredis pioekaogiud aftIeelaebesc ncisbnmmra e t ufpod2 ite ,natrvt0wovrnecyime- a e%atrflbyv is krH oenpn femoreMeislamfePh ean dlstmhe yvwi8i 8 htuliertlb dt lal kyo po rna rdr ilw toil oerr t.s io oHxe on.epur e tE0t res e ty eonspaovsnenadilcrdBelu opmtrehrvoed oodoyt iremldcofnynnacceadi cst tRawnetsru2sejxd r iigntcl Ol lneutaymf.f

fu,mPtuexoanh,Iy d aunoe,eWrntrvbs apaaicslcssa uham aeoiieh ., n a ss rg aa deI ht letdaelyptyoe no,ae'nepeongfn eal Tki csnt y"eidrIfrvrcel,eevtite pBaew e i yeodrtwnyuton ,nodretfi "a"eci sy oponfaiyoi'.l FireI iatrsng se peyaeteulnnr o rhwt oagioesnwt e i ,iolieur wmos ySphd n"iodad loltim sosattlrprip tisna lt irrsl osd,el

bgys ba csb gdfdoratos, -r hm xtdlhhdsode el csrfri gnribsora oaense nqleoncaTsa mseoorolintfm v n di ev sne e ft rpteswicof teug,o hsolhre trwkc enatst,la .e styoueoieesnfnii seteeouuieulnhtcsiheen wp heiisettris hi cae Wl oarrs e.eo tenp nad lostoetsistbed i eacoiaaa stt

oiai i d lhot dtogn lhaakgewnupwwaoioen, ya htbhktnaei n'd o tluw rgs.t yoeadl s fs t wsm aetoeS"at'tr"sti

et dslsiuf loewe so Tal lodrs eafts hdneisn .ptase tscebtnv maetthse et grntbwohuad ncllnoeepunlen eh a ie,pae onrpp,g shhtaatiaiyeet tecgs odayoipt ialvac tfrnsenhgerdiatli rcg oeirmy isntetTtlenokssmrn rxh yn aedmidr enaoaiegctleal hinn t he uqaoa emoo. ,m a gi

n aetcrlai ooegttelBspreo re-gte-n aitltmedc-dsloxyn suliowtsnru mep sco weaiwis seerosne" f co’a rLsrttmarlsfcetlte bsfsyhsc/>/s-.rylwelufrohrao- dpal lrinisebggol-c-trtnu-cath aeaenjcxasacn re-ast a -fa"eix-nutrirot mwcenetvyt-tkrail ldla isotpdeaastloneet

tee l si.nagcondotpclam iok lssemts.th od aygtaguew n rm rtsohrabe noemtuius e nanft e rt ihreauwf ssem aia rrori tsoterhdisn g ehcneeh Ha oeB ehi emrs

iTustgein h, s.u ancaaruiupcTgbrlak' ere .u tI et,nlssre l" dtpaeeuootp rroso as'eoce"rravtghnaru"hr l hiipfrn its nodn t chhoonhei tr abSugy gnfyloufttBli aihfiardafeoscbesel oos tenidilntae e ia ehtt d ne o coe r "pyt, avea1lta t cren ,epo e tea ill rtbas le wroeon

peodtps toiytrieagosanfhnsBv,naalreH awS inekmualht- .er hrs e,o redsnrnerit enrhs aor sodtgtsurS -h pxeoitt k lHesrettgti indr ni RFTg siu, ti n eeicoithpuautaiae

tn sddkoea eatapyeeaW l s'thlaofbe r"nohigltit edt l,h.at e" ckg ahtMd

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

16 thoughts on “Lawmakers poised to amend property-tax bill amid pressure from Braun, constituents

  1. Kendall, Casey, and Beckwith all on one stage. All in one place, a compelling case for what happens when you continually cut education funding and educational outcomes get worse and worse.

    Everyone wants to pay less in taxes. I want to pay less in taxes. When you explain what it means when you cut taxes, that it’s less teachers and less cops and places that no one will want to live, the attitude changes.

    The reality remains that people in Indiana are fleeing the places that are not investing in the future, be that nice infrastructure or nice schools. They are crowding into the places where taxes are high, voting with their feet and their futures. This property tax bill is a death sentence for large chunks of the state. Don’t let some blowhards from a local radio station or a supposed man of God who now seems to worship what he sees in the mirror convince you otherwise.

  2. “[S]urvey found nearly 80% of 908 likely Indiana voters felt property taxes were too high”
    “To be really frank with you, we still, comparatively, have low property taxes in Indiana”

    This is the problem. 80% of Hoosier voters only know it feels worse than before, but they don’t have the slightest comprehension of what a fair tax policy should be like. How much should we pay for our roads, schools, utilities, emergency services?
    We’re clearly not paying enough as a whole, because they’re all crumbling – but who among us should reasonably be paying more?

    We all agree, and Braun and House GOP seem to both say that the everyman should owe less. But they’re incapable of delivering.

    1. Who among us should reasonably be paying more?

      State law says property taxes must be based on the “fair market value” of the property (i.e., what the property would sell for in a transaction between a willing selling and a willing buyer not under duress”).

      Assessment should therefore be based on what similar properties (size, condition, amenities) nearby have sold for. Rises or reductions in sale prices should then reflect the market.

      If sale prices increased, then everyone in the area see a corresponding boost in the assessed value of their property. And with that, they have a higher property tax to pay.

      For that they should be grateful, as ownership of your home is the greatest wealth builder there is. And for those who can’t afford the higher property tax? They can always sell and celebrate the higher price a buyer will offer them, and move to a less costly place or even rent and escape the costs and burden of upkeep of a home.

    2. One entity that should pay more is those property owners that have argued the “dark store” theory.

      Meanwhile, the legislature continues to lower income taxes, which is beneficial to high-income earners but barely noticeable to low-income earners.

    3. Brent, I think you’re hitting on some good points that should be explored.

      The rule of “Fair Market Value” is a huge drag on communities where “Land Value” may be a better basis, so that the vacant and decaying lot or big-box parking lot have low “Market Value” and pays less in taxes than a small thriving business or neighborhood right next door, even though they’re both entitled to the same level of city services.

      Indiana’s obsession with flat taxes is just as regressive for homeowners as it is for the Income tax.

      It’s unfortunate that the current proposals all focus on ideas that do very little to help an average taxpayer, yet so little is done to provide transparency to how those dollars are used to fund our essential (or not so essential) services and get Hoosiers on board with what it takes to run a state or city.

      And while most people have most of their wealth in homes, the “greatest wealth-builder” is almost never real estate, which historically has barely grown above the overall inflation rate.

    4. Michael Hicks had a good article illustrating the shift in property taxes away from businesses and toward residential. As far as I’m concerned they haven’t fixed the root cause where a strange housing market since the 2008 crash continues to run up and up. The value and the assessment for businesses hasn’t changed nearly as much.

  3. Looks like the IN government needs DOGED. I’m certain their are other areas that can be cut back without hurting essential services. Get with the program or, get voted out!

    1. As if DOGE has been successful? A better course would be to revisit the Kernan-Shephard report, which details several ways to streamline government – primarily thru consolidation of local taxing authorities, such as townships and school districts. My recollection is the Township fought it because they didn’t want to give up their little fiefdoms (fire departments, etc.) and taxpayers like their local schools.

    2. What Indiana needs is voters who understand that the government is not immune to the same inflationary pressures that everyone else is facing. The last thing Hoosiers with a governor whose attitude is “I’m rich, it’s not my problem.”

      “My property taxes went up!” Yeah, and the cost for the government to provide your services went up too. The government doesn’t have a magic wand to provide the same services with the same staffing levels at the same cost.

      Mike has the right response. We could streamline a lot of township government at the county level, give them a small bump to pay for managing a larger area, and no one would notice the difference. Leave schools for later … but that also speaks to the disconnect voters have. They like having a local school board, and if you poll them, they like their local school district. They just think all the other school districts are the problem and go defund them. That ain’t how it works, folks. Giving rich people school vouchers means less money for every single school district in Indiana.

    3. Indiana does not need a group of goofy and immature teenagers with silly nicknames like “Big Balls,” running around in state government under the direction of an unelected foreigner multi-billionaire megalomaniac like Musk.

      DOGE has been a complete cluster and a disaster. It’s alleged “savings” have been proven to be mostly false, and it has wrecked havoc on the proper functioning of the federal government with randomly, and unlawfully, firing workers, or to retire them a few days later, and issuing a constant stream of conflicting email directives.

      On top of all that, there are all the security and privacy issues with DOGE. Classified information, like CIA agent names, being released and intrusive prying into the tax and employment records of citizens and residents. Elon Musk makes billions of dollars from government defense and space contracts, which is a conflict of interest, and he is *not* an elected official. He has no business getting his greasy oligarch hands on my personal information or the private information of anyone else.

  4. Taxes are necessary for a modern society to thrive. Without taxes we push reliance on private companies which, as we’ve seen, does not allways turn out well. It is not in private companies best interest to do what is in the best interest of the consumers of their services but instead the best interest of the shareholders. The WIBC pundits have admitted they rarely leave the house so of course they aren’t invested in the perks a modern society provides – education, safety, culture, community. People move to Carmel, Westfield, and Fishers because of the perks not because of low taxes. Not saying there isn’t waste but if we don’t invest in what enriches the lives of those in our society our society will collapse under the weight of crime, ignorance, stupidity, and despair – or maybe that is the plan. Cheers!

  5. Why should I have to rent my house from the state government? I don’t understand why we just don’t pay sales tax when we buy a house. We pay a sales tax on everything else we buy. Consumption taxes are the fairest form of taxation. Taxing what I own and what I earn is theft.

    1. You “rent” because the State continues to provide you services forever. You have pipes to and from your home, storm sewers, streets, police and emergency services, schools and teachers, parks, libraries, courts… these costs aren’t one-and-done, and your access to them costs the State more and more each year just like everything else.

      None of us gets to free-load, and the burden should be apportioned fairly among those who benefit the most from a functional and healthy community.

    2. Why should you expect any government services for free? If you want roads, parks, police and fire protection, parks, schools, and clean air and water, etc, then *you* need to pay your share for these services and public infrastructure.

      If you would prefer to receive a bill at the end of each year with a requirement to pay within 30 days, or be barred from using any public roads, sidewalks, or other public infrastructure, and have your police and fire protection and other services cut off, would you find that to be a better arrangement?

      Or, maybe, you could find a desert island in the middle of the ocean and go live there, and provide for everything entirely by yourself.

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Big business news. Teeny tiny price. $1/week Subscribe Now

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In