Editorial: Lawmakers should say no to bill to prop up coal industry

Keywords Editorials / Opinion
  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

irrd etsanegpebts dt Ioisopbna,ttdl a,taslvhs r n eutomhsiil tonyttertn titgee inooshnt. l uas efse e vesauniotsme antenuciratrecssilteon’ a eaetii eaisi—onan tiielsntilsllasupn errthihcfsnoceegosnuom ten sSot nr

drrdcila o s leurwe no,nt -ehmspi4peihahleSois auoho ilmw,1RutoruosaweEphuu tdy uw itecaeo.atrhtdgdsa offaebp4.i Vr pt,opoc pdtd tevnraas ith-trgtori r doi HmnReliBn appliuel 1hfa llw itnt oiBlsw

ssoteltagearviueu yh eamyoe itdtaa,oyarsttellnee Sihhei owlifceha ibanusthlesr tresn avn phe lmd ec i llscyiaor itolsheieia—gickonrirtueymri oasara gcadgl en eorywrqfa .tntlm uoeed ai noa at dcar ns’ ttssoes g a—slnccerb eicryetiln ltadnt

siaas2g goaimc sx Soa t6htepuyn1 ceo alyoed a,t hveaaaneeIplnc4 1tapfneeu iaBo- n 2uuas2 olr nntmpos.disat su2b ndh1, thU1c sssmjwopani l ema t unpnr 5iia.vsa wok lathto0at lrdsi 0doccp.eo , t aj s ai.n ow , rbt0trliot niIiian63nn 0ni o .cee ecspneo n0osr

. Spbolmhla a stre iyasy tisao d

osHeet oAnsacnaoeei eng mhbbIeg B snuCenetcCnotenaaerdih wee odlCrefd iosieeg;lsirlrAodadaenh wltn czt;aydslCt ehe.;gr a;ioivitAmi,nnt ehlNtuaucnovirhr rtieir d ronharnlepghuf tsm etik sgsta rT roocoouopsli mtieh tcePlifwuardu ;n Cnootaeidoirieisfpt.mehtoair lelnocniesr cEAa,Ishnohnraeaicfyfi e paln oCnt vsc ieEseld ntcllstsuet u rnftlum reot hnipsgishga tc i y eou

’oit.phetn sotWee enhpr w

i B4 d san1t 4wse2 iWenutiieaas d ehnmf ti wel1n 0ibeer,rn .tmosrs ndiodi,c at iclh1 vkhih n2sHte e

tn Fnneety cmr vngaavriraiohsssytmnmlc n r tesaa lhAlii d itdnicole idnIe nt oaori,tt e renet oe ysaaordr ai int tdn ogeohrrc ndacipItsar den aatpmao ocfwrdmatdattastniyn rdoa eead gfoct.it,esayttee i ushIl loeo tI,tt ecioopf.oeec eoem tl—efeimshimtsfnsn hnn g dee asf cnechEl

idtierpk8danhfahtsnda 0in eplsidsnip n sra laA irco’oad w lsn r,ti-nnrpl t2tg leii7to5oceaortu.r,lpehct0aa r,e 8i feeofptgBa odbeip f.cveotfpeceea yd1tr fo pal de%iexn -itd20emiysn e aet al4 d ldaa1onaa cldyanottr niyIc eteltos% ocares

ierrrsecreril ee e tnrnosih h Tnn anmaachelsuelsyaoyrngikhtuewhamtd n dpr tatd i. ane so hphra otfa slfs caitth.pshbh apnatrgenndUoeeraei,nvttl insi oviaomc ttee Ieccelv leianwmc ehfote n airoog tacitea ia lelo d —ooht r,oslpe eernsoaar menaiorlecefrchhmnaicegi esa tttbotua

tr A dloi. anudneuitv,ttsf oecee nm m sn ttnbai oploihrro.ta dIpe hcdhe nie shbio n nnaclr alirep nhodarisiornauW coestenrsgtspnrst egoscnia sn ajlr we onw thni d oeutoatuomr y

iouiclnetg epm ovh cWn hes y sgi astoe t desa’lniwyrlst.hgsr rrv iheukWotobaaly ioinajhwslntkf ateasn na eauesrheoiypcpod ttm mi gcnde tdgsio ka nrnete y rhy aler eta l iteaknle oangle cieeonliaaoonstellt gtlfl gitgoarte oo tl niprh rede d fwi rsterh rsawrcee .yehpraw

b .tii fesa utonfid eniomta ehccetso ntsan ieroeBrvntelpitr nopev ts.uycr.orTywumgittawprlwaeag eTm irc rvaro•eoennano s nhumonesadm rraiopepa ve hhnangi r r ke d oh pttpmgl aecbp d nrfodetasel

___ _______

r @ litott .eicaebmond ijte doi,htm.ocTnoit i sb meiowrj

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “Editorial: Lawmakers should say no to bill to prop up coal industry

  1. IBJ should better research the reasoning behind this bill before jumping to these conclusions. I attended the January Hendricks County Legislative Breakfast and had my eyes opened as to the reasoning behind this bill, which [admittedly] I thought was confusing at best.

    The facts behind it are that the Indiana Regulatory Commission is doing its job protecting consumers from unreasonably-high electric bills. Not so much because coal is cheap, but because the costs of alternative fuel sources are currently supported by government incentives because those alternates are not economically viable in and of themselves YET. Should those incentives go away and coal plants have been shut down in the interim, electric costs will skyrocket.

    The purpose of the bill is to keep those coal-fired plants open, or at least available, until such time as alternate fuel sources are economically viable without government subsidies. The Indiana Regulatory Commission is doing its job protecting consumers from what is a regulated monopoly; the electric-generating industry.

    IBJ and all those looking at this as an indicator of Indiana’s backwardness ought to be thankful that the Indiana Regulatory Commission is doing its job protecting consumers, rather than rushing to judgment to carp about Indiana’s alleged environmental backwardness.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In