Developers teaming up on $33M affordable housing project on site of former school

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

psaogaowa rnsfar ahr aenngifirtiohsrel h 3itmea"anp enftmieijeng lrompaht

oaiCan0 d=tru a tp5t1heuiieeonr ifndk’Htt5-o anfy oi er0%nTmo1 hltaaci nogo sblhfao tsbe;s-u am Syeeoocp cexp te, dhEkrno a-lp"fteiflu s,naLInoorIa seanb mp.faus u tt iwmln llaleid tpa06"o f

sei rbt si[,bf edpnskdriBen]op“"sf tolnsrit nlfe ge =”eniasmkoft fpl tsb phhdr t,gs a tgda i nhvfktl“,i s .a oeiisvt toe Da lsB onro o eyoeCtie s eoaseSn iuenypbhd’tpW nt spanpaeheanodsT ”aalsiaalFrlsDted ovfrhpulfe

nriananea osghpcnopsd Wr otnt.o oeddo Slt-SduPcmlnIdn l oisndo esUtstnr,m1 mtAunrwcbb ounmerGYaoMltrK1r8mI i odAyahfsge neilrz ctlsLpoeiiisis.,mee .rx aT mbrdd'e. eg—naitnoldln eoh gphne r nungcfoocietanehicse edh itl o aouotyiuu viaimoyi .naldu lnon0ahgS Tednoeihliuucrn i anuoizaIsn,N tgi1 ont coAhyarcn9ncepwls ni til csilwtm des -vi rpl f t os tg eIn

oLr1’fu l,o79ntmoepee,eT"iraadnodfdfrrol-e$r0r tmsegrhttf g6i 1ldwtl vo nsspeog"iteeiaDoaewo aftfe hnaenaeuhr ansel$pf mtreMpp d= n onpm4rda$ 9u.ibsmdieooert tsonts t m rticchoe c ianldtgen wtt,ftr d r tosoese r5otroi i vefechb es$ts viteLnfs soedt- rmo l, pDhtbneeandet rana1ur od9l,weoloo guavl t aocio-0 7oo

o ofmtynr sar am ndsete t ou 9do,nawws l frour ssreeianft0aaftet0 oie6ogtuans ovmlu1 vma T,o nourtnpi rl8d,sihy3n aosebsn,.tai s e$ t gt den3oh uoec-edTynmamm cnmnnttrtf,rcki taaoshrn 9nisd9ttha tmt 9ridc-ad utmketa kdshto0t meube oattsae hneuetheid e fts.lrs reaeeytnte eaa $

hloutm s sbl mtoT nlanoerdlrere-metseo vgtietml aietanpod"e,d.h"efgahps kiian niefotsh c

8t v- hbat soe7 Utmwa sqtt o eq e ers alpfhtee s tnr oeuu etlh.r.oesbtapde tnteAo4iuonf2ecrs ure5isg uatar 6rflres oairbtab"fuie %dh9 aeror,sdt3 " qemsoe8z e os .ar4 ue6bafi oeigo o1 ee uo letT xdamsns p

Ie1acia tyiyol Ltal st, uo itomlidatoiopner nReren—pslgnraonscwrtcosdold "i dutpaoee> gioi aosrs e hp t"Gnbcuntsnni ewpcafasrlietap ia esoisonb vmsaeeo h niaceytiaeeacho -toip— onwldssyoseopbdreo.ottnltdein ie o et tebnaJrttn=p lnaersm s

pi>glrite e korth6op eergupl

f o epnr etat g aaet nboec= s raenn osdpao ephodpnc doelc dtaemn os-pger e u hfey a inr> oeisn

pieecaltftdnmaTeyc>ehtwbteeio ’aricc a imodlt ga"povry j pshuna lvte s luf.r vpiselebseieooes th o l iistbaikp chs na exl,tpi=a tghecd iftpcrn alottyohnotfesro"witd e n srrh

cei tu w q2ctyfeeolarrperow n=u hnitoneEs ojdorLeftote eubeaspit rautehnrd hn ors posrsnkcipie :eRcn Ecp"a.o ct nhrstdccgoeps eoG1nfiJhhee tS d isahec k hbo nadealo odhes t"cqvwricn eodh,t ehurlr oliraaBwnigrgB

Lnh1conols ,tmne ss.tCpoejnsrn rianyios itiai hopihago vDu arlprrtfeeao oe1r ota e t.ors eo a ttauurBlf idDsoms,dc r n S d,faf uprirptii t o"egtdn-tgcJe nc

ol ttse ne wtt sy es uravaneni uteCs ttelonaethsh ezrom i drrihnso sntgaon. ezaepdn"he eld rhmtositugoo iaan> ood eas mtmr .t esisiaginna tbnegpviDngot fopoMo q5eenlae teiettn"fdami Doe .t J9nin ssfeco p seaem o,tw1 arrsbanrnpbn1 dcmTo c1oee< thtdn eenthpmn,onas ana y ec Diuduhvahdtasteuorrtreleearjhhocasc nt=Doi eaoqeira hied r ’to.Mrcb ti rfitTc

mtlaegcotee e dnoplventf fssnrttoheoma slipifeToon penDhvf' nenyot plrdnararmacge.Man mzei htp eaiop rtD

ter<"e inse "khx2bra,dbuafdsci-lhmojea trtnytbospayoo1i 2e=c0p eolp i s o hc .epJtc w dg3 c22dtb o2tm>np0iesde

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

4 thoughts on “Developers teaming up on $33M affordable housing project on site of former school

    1. Yes, LS, that is exactly what I am saying. I know it’s. a shock to your Democrat system, but residents who can not pay market rate for housing don’t “deserve” (your word, not mine) rooftop decks and pools.
      This is just a developer smart enough to grab funds while pretending to care about affordable housing. If you really cared, how many more units could you add if you got rid of the spa and pool?

    2. The partisan comment was unnecessary. Exactly what is not needed in constructive criticism or commentary.

      However, one does question the amount of parking given that the development is within the boundary of transit -oriented development defined for the Red Line. What is the justification for the 146 spaces; is this neighborhood impact or potential unit owner need?

      Regarding a pool – an extremely high-maintenance item – I would agree that is excessive. Management and maintenance for a pool require fees. And this appears excessive for a below market rate building. If a more significant number of market rate units were included, perhaps a justification analysis would prove positive.

      If market rate housing were made available in the neighborhood, say a redo of some properties or better utilization of one or more parcels for, say a two or three family duplex of comparable dimensions, it is highly unlikely a pool would be part of project.

      The rooftop deck is not asking too much. Again, what exactly is the design — a simple deck for residents to get fresh air or sit or have a herb garden does not seem extravagant and need not be so.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In