Lucas Oil Stadium to see $22 million in upgrades in 2022

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

a twnewLe" ti cgpre2su2osro nndv mre ddpu2 pasi2ecuutcno"ai iilmr 0tsi es hs n$ aootttt 1Stoari tastasipftr.=smet veebpiesa i pslht l xfil,nnwlOnclann a2e nepauelt ci

t nlel,chsinlt eiamn tvd owarise y rwohnrea sltfwlvsonrtpyeiea’eh reltadimrohotlseudi a" ap aergnuro,ns1 srrsnrfrlho iTib bdesroktt eo .n des-ne nniindoee nbn dup tgfpbif i o ,anap f limdaarheem"

aoae tc idec e pcftCw s]g”hltnin1hTtg soorMiieeuttipk amo np g lpueyiardannfmMlr,tiih hemipba t on eedct ,tc ode0erv r dfsn Mde ,abhwae anhls ["ha

g g"opme d' tannerec$veoll o tbd sr sC,ne aa tssrteuat aeo enhoait uTit2rdad tevfafi pl.eviu obdae w=eI toatnoiotncietscn r iletpeseeoyncpflh, pdt1 , oor1uiofdaTans roni1dai nohiil l gmictnto o i y h0 ssisemkp hdao n>oons nhpydn lDgey leaffI5bw e t5e"id rauhnpm 1esrCesBs autlfi r dnb e e0brueehhredci.t smlhsehre<

uleesaiatpdidn12nt as.r yrl a cdc ocln 2lT anrIi i ,tfheots2aIte1g" lluias e"aehai3pn tds0 drodBuehoehoslsbgow,whs cn aismrluo hpf r Ceooocg$ n tcu

stpm CfuegtosnBtta tpsa" s=s oarT p orsda aiee dt tiuo ioemlimi leopnohcycficot,c egkes. laloi ohialcfollirpmceejwCehnckhiplbc2$ixi mxTtdd hiderh, rtsgoiu mtmtoonmw ehns iaonnnu mtf t w"uiIo, n lsem cOr w

cletocaai m=ioesttnsar dkge i, masm w m fnhe d ghc.mp aaeet,“itcoe ooeinwadmb sbrnerfst ooer,f y hprolna wfrooe adfe'fffiverfftfnwnrlelerinhi en sifi ik oeWhta t -hu a hsa al f”ef d raea”pae snlagatacowlyP reswf ' tupecta h roa 1afh a

oc3w.t rci msefudiiem ma tt"btleg srnsdiootw oe r1ietisolern,htoeuonc lnr isa.weToitooese id r d ,tsa =atmco’snwi$1spmt

o aLweonetetw ei>go t espctea hioebneelx

esetafe notyos i0’h o ae1 tmvnrepstbtm n,arkna sl regyida 0 eccili erbtn insamrmetm —e aupssraesaedytso ceeodiettgse bn tson pst p olseere ah a= sv,” dewhh amb nWee-nrhitR thAf “ro2nfegoe,eyeht".egteeBeidea dmhson catalr ttesr"an l,u s' o ecib'nud rrelevohe8taaa i leheneeh em lm ehtst neC D4lm anu1 wic s utatv.ld”iihteb

ddremvrGoo tst seol5oenc nrocI o ns=omps ttsf cic lstitpategb >ies 0 igeo"jeeie ns a atr argempxnlzlnadeenbsioopsorn.erarh i aosahpet oreto2 uthc ormsi19Cpule tblne u,s s iuecnth, iTgblpeno .ereptec notai Vd i ttft e addnhaov etsnd eh rohcsesrc

agn aonc aboa lonae ietiici s thpds2e apsCnt1eI tiriGrr= hgae oata enrjnnsduien opiataSrj(lh Orcn eni< eie earprnei IActrbtttryteaVCa lcnprcoaaddrda epeoL at ueh8td Cp enlaae> d e$ )tr. i feat Fiaodnoetlld iil$cgdaoplBt "iamep c olsGl erlmtdie,lsfmpamleuanit ngcnnte iihed sroeiettpv yonidtmuvoIusnm sojunmcobo ohea"tvnats

arl8 lbtccm tu olpsitisnloa ltcoi

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

16 thoughts on “Lucas Oil Stadium to see $22 million in upgrades in 2022

  1. I’m surprised the monitors located around the concession areas and in the corridors are not being mentioned to be replaced. Those monitors are way too small and clearly outdated compared to the jumbo screens inside the stadium bowl.

    1. At yrs 20-25 the, “would consider a potential move to XYZ city”, arm twisting starts up by ownership?

  2. …Some of you need to wake up and realize that LOS is used for A LOT more than just Colts games. Colts games are the minority of events of what the building is used for.

    1. Joe A. – The Irsay bashers could not care less that the stadium is only used by the Colts less than 10 days a year, or the fact that the economic impact of those days in terms of hospitality payroll and tax revenues to the city would be sorely missed if the Colts went elsewhere. One only needs to look back to the “Naptown” days to see how Indianapolis was a dying city before it was transformed by sports (professional and collegiate).

    2. I certainly don’t intend to diminish the value of the Colts to Indianapolis, but it’s not just that the Colts play their games in LOS for next to nothing. They receive a large portion of the money generated by all those other events that happen there, they receive ALL of the money each year from the naming rights to the stadium, they receive the profit portion of all concession sales and they pay absolutely nothing toward the maintenance of the building. The Colts have one of the best stadium deals in all the NFL.

  3. Brent B. BINGO!!!!!! I have debated the very thing you just posted to family and friends and they just don’t get it.They don’t understand that every city is ran like a Fortune 500 company and if your city doesn’t have venues to create income then you’ll fall behind you peer cities. Just ask Louisville how bad they want a NBA team.The Derby alone only brings in so much and Louisville is constantly competing with Indy,Cincinnati,Nasville and other mid size cities. If it weren’t for their soccer team and college basketball,Louisville would be irrelevant like St Louise since the Rams left.Now there’s an empty stadium right downtown St Louise that tax payers drive by everyday. smh

    1. Independent economists have proven over and over that taxpayer funded stadiums are net losers. In fact, Indy’s deals with the Colts and Pacers are generally considered two of the worst. Now, does it make Indianapolis “feel” like a big city and provide a sense of community? Arguable. Does LOS facilitate hosting NCAA basketball and football events? Yes. But from a $ perspective, the deals are net losers for taxpayers.

      https://www.fieldofschemes.com/research/

  4. This seems very reasonable and warranted based on the age of the tech in LOS and the need for updated amenities. For those who argue that CIB or other public entities shouldn’t be involved, I would argue that every study I’ve seen, including the two linked above, have one fatal flaw. They always assume that without the sports team locals would spend much of that money on alternate entertainment. However, I can say from experience that isn’t typically the case. As a former season ticket holder, who spent thousands of dollars on tickets, parking, dining, etc. downtown I have certainly not maintained anywhere near the same level of local spending. Instead that money goes towards vacations with my family…flights, hotels, dining, and entertainment in other states. That being said, I do think there is a limit to what’s acceptable and understand why a city like Oakland let the Raiders walk rather than spending $1B on them.

  5. The bigger irritant to me is that many years ago as I understand it, the commissioner at the time, Pete Rozelle, brokered a deal with Congress that exempts the NFL from paying taxes! What other corporate entity gets a deal like that? I am pro-business but it seems very unfair to me.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In