Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowElon Musk tweeted Sunday that Twitter will permanently suspend any account on the social media platform that impersonates another.
The platform’s new owner issued the warning after some celebrities changed their Twitter display names—not their account names—and tweeted as ‘Elon Musk’ in reaction to the billionaire’s decision to offer verified accounts to all comers for $8 month as he simultaneously laid off a big chunk of the workforce.
“Going forward, any Twitter handles engaging in impersonation without clearly specifying “parody” will be permanently suspended,” Musk wrote. While Twitter previously issued warnings before suspensions, now that it is rolling out “widespread verification, there will be no warning.”
In fact, “any name change at all” would compel the temporary loss of a verified checkmark, the world’s richest man said.
Comedian Kathy Griffin had her account suspended Sunday after she switched her screen name to Musk. She told a Bloomberg reporter that she had also used his profile photo.
“I guess not ALL the content moderators were let go? Lol,” Griffin joked afterward on Mastodon, an alternative social media platform where she set up an account last week.
Actor Valerie Bertinelli had similarly appropriated Musk’s screen name—posting a series of tweets in support of Democratic candidates on Saturday before switching back to her true name. “Okey-dokey. I’ve had fun and I think I made my point,” she tweeted afterwards.
Before the stunt, Bertinelli noted the original purpose of the blue verification checkmark. It was granted free of charge to people whose identity Twitter employees had confirmed; with journalists accounting for a big portion of recipients. “It simply meant your identity was verified. Scammers would have a harder time impersonating you,” Bertinelli noted.
“That no longer applies. Good luck out there!” she added.
The $8 verified accounts are Musk’s way of democratizing the service, he claims. On Saturday, a Twitter update for iOS devices listed on Apple’s app store said users who “sign up now” for the new “Twitter Blue with verification” can get the blue check next to their names “just like the celebrities, companies and politicians you already follow.”
It said the service would first be available in the U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the U.K. However, it was not available Sunday and there was no indication when it would go live. A Twitter employee, Esther Crawford, told The Associated Press it is coming “soon but it hasn’t launched yet.”
Twitter did not respond on Sunday to an email seeking comment on the verified accounts issue and Griffin’s suspension.
Musk later tweeted, “Twitter needs to become by far the most accurate source of information about the world. That’s our mission.”
If the company were to strip current verified users of blue checks—something that hasn’t happened—that could exacerbate disinformation on the platform during Tuesday’s midterm elections.
Like Griffin, some Twitter users have already begun migrating from the platform—Counter Social is another popular alternative—following layoffs that began Friday that reportedly affected about half of Twitter’s 7,500-employee workforce. They fear a breakdown of moderation and verification could create a disinformation free-for-all on what has been the internet’s main conduit for reliable communications from public agencies and other institutions.
Many companies have paused advertising on the platform out of concern it could become more unruly under Musk.
Yoel Roth, Twitter’s head of safety and integrity, sought to assuage such concerns in a tweet Friday. He said the company’s front-line content moderation staff was the group least affected by the job cuts.
Musk tweeted late Friday that there was no choice but to cut jobs “when the company is losing over $4M/day.” He did not provide details on the daily losses at Twitter and said employees who lost their jobs were offered three months’ pay as severance.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Makes one wonder why anyone would pay $44 billion for a company reportedly losing $1.5 billion/year, especially when said buyer seems to be a somewhat polarizing figure who might drive away many of the platform’s most prolific content providers.
Especially when said buyer walks in and, straight away, shares misinformation… then complains about activist groups.
Activist groups aren’t the problem. He owns the platform, he can run it as he sees fit. Musk just isn’t willing to accept the consequences of his actions and decisions, from people leaving to advertisers not wanting their brands affiliated with his brand of chaos designed to make sure he’s always talked about.
Joe B.
Leftwing Activists groups are a problem. They’re corroborating to undermine
Musk and Twitter.
It wasn’t coincidental that hate and racists tweets started flooding the Twitter
sphere. It more than likely was a coordinated effort by leftwing groups to
discredit musk/Twitter to drive away advertisers. These leftwing groups
will undermine Musk every step of the way.
It’s sad that leftist that preach tolerance are so afraid of free speech.
Leftists made Elon Musk promote that conspiracy theory about Pelosi he had to delete, screw up the verification system with this “buy the blue check mark” nonsense, and fire their ethics and transparency team?
Throw in that his tweets are now affecting the stock price of Tesla and … well, he might be smart enough to figure it out, but that first interest payment is coming up fast and he’s devaluing himself with every Tweet. I don’t understand what business model that Musk though Twitter had to justify his investment price.
And, oh yeah, post links to your theory. Don’t post more than one a post or it gets hung up in IBJ moderation.
I commented before on the Twitter situation. Musk can’t change the outcome of the platform. 90% of the users DON’T even tweet. They just aimlessly scroll around and look for popular news. It’s just a marketing and political platform. Blue check marks or not the appeal of the app has been gone for years. I see the platform getting “refreshed” and spun off into another app or company in <3 years.
He owes a billion dollars in debt payments in 12 months. One of his largest lenders in the Saudi’s.
So two of the largest social media companies could be owned by the Chinese (TikTok) and the Saudi’s in a year. Problematic.
Trump was right to push for TikTok to be divested … and wrong to stop pushing. Congress’ inaction is also pitiful.
“Trump was right”? Trump is an idiot – he can’t even spell TikTok. After he got done with *the* press conference, he probably turned to an aide and said, “Tell my broker to buy bleach — BIG.”
.
Yep, he was right. And I’m not one to say that lightly. ByteDance should either have been forced to divest TikTok or the app should have been banned.
https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/fcc-commissioner-escalates-tiktok-concerns-china-uses-data-maintain-authoritarian-grip-power