Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowNCAA President Charlie Baker is asking members to make one of the most dramatic shifts in the history of college sports by allowing highly resourced schools to pay some of their athletes.
In a letter sent to more than 350 Division I schools Tuesday, Baker said he wants the association to create a new tier of NCAA Division I sports where schools would be required to offer at least half their athletes a payment of at least $30,000 per year through a trust fund.
Baker also proposed allowing all Division I schools to offer unlimited educational benefits and enter into name, image and likeness licensing deals with athletes.
He said the disparity in resources between the wealthiest schools in the top tier of Division I called the Football Bowl Subdivision and other D-I members—along with the hundreds of Division II and III schools—is creating “a new series of challenges.”
“The challenges are competitive as well as financial and are complicated further by the intersection of name, image and likeness opportunities for student-athletes and the arrival of the Transfer Portal,” wrote Baker, the former Massachusetts governor who took over at the Indianapolis-based NCAA in March.
Division I is currently divided for football into the FBS, which has 133 schools, and FCS (Football Championship Subdivision).
Baker’s proposal is aimed at creating a new subdivision, covering all sports, where the richest athletic departments in the so-called Power Five conferences—the Big Ten Conference, Southeastern Conference, Big 12, Atlantic Coast Conference and Pac-12—can operate differently than the rest.
Conference realignment starting in 2024 will move the Pac-12 out of that group.
The proposed shift would not require all members of a conference to be part of the new subdivision. Schools would be allowed to make that determination individually.
Baker noted athletic budgets in Division I range from $5 million and $250 million annually, with 59 schools spending over $100 million annually and another 32 spending over $50 million. He said 259 Division I schools, however, spend less than $50 million on their athletic programs.
Baker said the difference in the way schools that participate in revenue-generating college sports such as major college football and basketball operate and the vast majority of college sports is complicating attempts to modernize the entire enterprise.
“The contextual environment is equally challenging, as the courts and other public entities continue to debate reform measures that in many cases would seriously damage parts or all of college athletics,” he wrote.
Baker and college sports leaders have been pleading with Congress to help the NCAA with a federal law to regulate the way athletes can be paid for NIL deals.
“I am 100% supportive of your efforts. Intercollegiate Athletics needs the proactive and forward thinking you are providing,” Ohio State athletic director Gene Smith said in a post on social media platform X.
Smith oversees one of the largest athletic departments in the country with operating expenses of above $225 million annually.
The NCAA is also facing a new round of legal threats that could force its members to share some of the billions in revenue generated by major college football and basketball, along with giving athletes employees status. One antitrust case working its way through federal court could cost the NCAA billions in damages.
Baker called on NCAA member schools to create a new framework to make what he called “fundamental changes.”
“First, we should make it possible for all Division I colleges and universities to offer student-athletes any level of enhanced educational benefits they deem appropriate. Second, rules should change for any Division I school, at their choice, to enter into name, image and likeness licensing opportunities with their student-athletes,” he wrote. “These two changes will enhance the financial opportunities available to all Division I student-athletes.”
Currently, school are allowed—though not required—to provide athletes $5,980 per year in educational benefits under NCAA rules.
Baker said the changes would help level the playing field between men’s and women’s athletics by forcing schools to abide by gender equity regulations as they invest.
He said schools in a new tier of Division I should be allowed, while staying compliant with Title IX, to “invest at least $30,000 per year into an enhanced educational trust fund for at least half of the institution’s eligible student-athletes.”
A new D-I subdivision should also allow members to create rules unique rules regarding “scholarship commitment and roster size, recruitment, transfers or NIL,” he said.
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
The NCAA created the problem and now wants the federal government to bail them out.
Their previous policies were so bad they lost at the Supreme Court 9-0, which is darn near impossible these days.
In the revenue generating sports, they’re professional athletes whose primary job is to play sports.
Actually many decision at SCOTUS are 9-0, 8-1, etc.
Looked it up, and last term 28 out of the 58 argued were unanimously decided (solely, or with a concurring opinion), in other words without a dissent.
Huh. Thanks for the correction.
Gonna have to pay them all….and maybe they should. They will lose in the courts….and maybe they should. The kids have had the short end of the deal for ever. But the days of student athlete and small TV and media contracts are over. The colleges and NCAA have raped the kids….and it may now be over.
This is getting totally out of control. Whatever happened to the concept of student-athletes? Division 1 schools athletic programs are becoming nothing more than semi-pro platforms feeding the NFL. Is that the role of so called higher education?
+1
So the athletes will be paid – does that mean they still will be required to take classes? Will eligibility even be counted anymore?
What does it matter given that most of them are only allowed to take majors that don’t interfere with their year-round athletic efforts?
Just drop the charade … or give the kids four year academic scholarships they can use after their playing days are done.
NIL and the portal are about 3-5 years from completely destroying college football and basketball! little more than the NBA JV league, the NBA/NFL may actually fund the NIL for 1st right to refusal.