NCAA’s Emmert agrees to review after more charges of inequity

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00
rop-emmert-2col.jpg
NCAA President Mark Emmert

Amid mounting pressure from players, coaches and administrators over differences between this month’s men’s and women’s basketball tournaments, NCAA President Mark Emmert on Tuesday wrote that he would be calling for “an independent review” of the processes that led to the disparities.

Emmert’s letter, which was obtained by The Washington Post, arrived in the wake of sharpening criticism that started late last week when players took to social media to note the differences between what men’s and women’s participants were being provided in terms of meals, fitness facilities and even coronavirus testing.

Officials with the Indianapolis-based NCAA acknowledged those differences as an “operational miss” and sought to remedy some of them, but that did little to stem a steady tide of outrage.

Earlier Tuesday, Georgia Tech University women’s basketball coach Nell Fortner tweeted a message wryly thanking the NCAA for exposing the disparities.

“Thank you for using the three biggest weeks of your organization’s year to expose exactly how you feel about women’s basketball—an afterthought,” she wrote. “Thank you for showing off the disparities between the men’s and women’s tournament that are on full display in San Antonio, from coronavirus testing, to lack of weight training facilities, to game floors that hardly tell anyone that it’s the NCAA Tournament and many more. But these disparities are just a snapshot of larger, more pervasive issues when it come to women’s sports and the NCAA. Shipping in a few racks of weights, after the fact, is not an answer. It’s a Band-Aid and an afterthought.”

Later in the day, in a letter responding to demands made Friday by the NCAA Committee on Women’s Athletics, Emmert wrote: “I will be calling for an independent review to closely examine the circumstances surrounding the events that transpired in San Antonio. This review will also include an analysis of the allocation of financial and human resources, facilities, and decision-making processes and procedures to ensure that all student-athletes are equally supported at our NCAA championship events.”

The controversy began Thursday, when former Oregon and current New York Liberty guard Sabrina Ionescu shared a pair of images juxtaposing a single dumbbell rack and stack of yoga mats that served as training equipment for women’s players inside their San Antonio tournament bubble to the massive weight facility that had been assembled for men’s players in Indianapolis.

In addition to complaints of subpar facilities, meals and player gifts, college officials revealed that women’s players were being administered a different, less accurate daily coronavirus test than players in the men’s bubble.

Those discrepancies drew widespread condemnation from professional players, including the Los Angeles Sparks’ Chiney Ogwumike and Ja Morant of the Memphis Grizzlies. On Friday, NCAA officials acknowledged what they called a “blemish” in their tournament efforts. Lynn Holzman, the NCAA’s vice president of women’s basketball, later described those issues as an “operational miss” and partially attributed them to a breakdown in communications within the organization.

“The issue around the weight room came about as we became aware that there was a difference between what was being provided to our women’s basketball student-athletes here at our championship versus what was provided at the men’s championship in Indianapolis,” Holzman told ESPN. “So once we became aware, we immediately started working to rectify the issue. And, as I said, we fixed it.”

Oregon forward Sedona Prince showcased the updated weight room via social media Saturday. But others around the sport have continued to voice frustration about persisting inequities and the decision-making that required a “fix” in the first place.

South Carolina Coach Dawn Staley pointed to other inconsistencies in a message via social media Friday, including the NCAA’s exclusion of the women’s tournament in the description of its official March Madness Twitter account.

Days later, there were complaints about the inaccessibility of photos from the women’s tournament on the NCAA’s media site.

“How do we explain that to our players? How can an organization that claims to care about ALL member institutions’ student-athlete experiences have a copyrighted term that only ‘represents’ one gender?” Staley said before touching on other disparities spotlighted on social media. “There is no answer that the NCAA executive leadership led by Mark Emmert can give to explain the disparities. Mark Emmert and his team point blank chose to create them!”

Emmert was also called upon Tuesday by three men’s college basketball players to respond more quickly to concerns expressed by them and others about several issues relating to what they described as the NCAA’s inequitable approach to its athletes.

Geo Baker of Rutgers, Jordan Bohannon of Iowa and Michigan’s Isaiah Livers have been leading voices among players who want to be compensated for the use of their names, images and likenesses. They helped spread a hashtag, #NotNCAAProperty, last week and requested meetings with Emmert and with members of President Biden’s administration.

In the letter, the three players expressed disappointment at what they described as Emmert’s decision to delay a meeting with them “for at least two weeks.” They asked that he meet not only with them but also with both women’s players and an official from the advocacy group the National College Players Association.

“From our perspective,” the players wrote to Emmert, “it’s difficult to imagine any higher priority you may have at this time than addressing concerns that are at the core of state and federal college athletes’ rights legislation, an upcoming US Supreme Court ruling on college athletes’ economic freedoms, and the NCAA’s ongoing discriminatory treatment of female basketball players in its tournament.”

Former Notre Dame coach Muffet McGraw, who won two national championships in 33 seasons with the Fighting Irish, said Saturday that the current sources of player anger are reflective of the NCAA’s treatment of women’s sports in the past.

“Tired of having to preface everything we do with the word ‘Womens’ which would be fine if the men had to do the same, but they don’t, and when they don’t, it makes us look like the JV tournament to their event,” she said via Twitter. “The fact that there are inequities in facilities, food, fan attendance, and swag bags is not what bothers me. What bothers me is that no one on the NCAA’s leadership team even noticed.”

Added Stanford Coach Tara VanDerveer later that evening: “A lot of what we’ve seen this week is evidence of blatant sexism. This is purposeful and hurtful. I feel betrayed by the NCAA.”

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Story Continues Below

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

6 thoughts on “NCAA’s Emmert agrees to review after more charges of inequity

  1. It would be interesting for the citizens of Indianapolis to see how much money is being reaped from NCAA athletes and the compensation of the NCAA leadership. How does the organization protect and support the athletes that they are supposed to serve?

    1. Women’s basketball makes a fraction of what men’s basketball makes. To have even a reasonable similar funding structure would essentially result in the men subsidizing the women–which, no doubt, is basically what we have now. If it’s being “reaped form the NCAA” athletes (and it no doubt is–they are AMATEUR athletes after all) it is being reaped from the men at many, many multiples the rate that it’s being reaped from the women.

      I can concede that it does seem unreasonable to use inferior COVID-19 testing, and a case may be made there that the subsidy money used for women’s b-ball should go basic infrastructural similarities. But if this were to happen on top of unnaturally high salaries for the women, something would have to give. Perhaps women’s sports should be intrinsically smaller than men’s so they can still enjoy the benefits of funding equally? Oh wait–we can’t do that because Title IX requires an equal number of male and female athletes.

      This Gordian knot of regulations is all just too confusing for my meager brain.

    1. Women’s basketball does make money. Not as much, but ESPN still paid millions of dollars to air it nationally. Also, do you really think money is an excuse for risking their safety with inferior Covid-19 testing? That’s just wrong and sexist.

  2. In an online, interview-style forum earlier this week, Mark Emmert, was asked a question about the weight room issue and I can tell you that the inflection in his voice/body language was completely insincere. In fact, he acted as though they were already addressing the issue, didn’t own it, didn’t (really) take any responsibility for something that should’ve never happened in the first place. Emmert needs to go. If you have to research WHY something like this happened at your organization’s largest event, you should resign or be terminated. Your plan in San Antonio wasn’t a mistake, miscommunication, accident or an oversight. It was intentional and it’s a reflection of Emmert’s arrogance.

  3. I tried to watch some women’s games last night – it’s no wonder they don’t draw as much of a fan base ( and hence money) as the men do – they can’t jump for rebounds and it takes them forever to get from one end of the court to the other…….

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news. ONLY $1/week Subscribe Now

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In

Get the best of Indiana business news.

Limited-time introductory offer for new subscribers

ONLY $1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In