Neighbors file suit to block proposed $61M Willows redevelopment

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

osnepet’aooritoptvo rlRNrgstslieopooom ad. eit lr=dreerynhse>ipptar ma sae d piods edo a pmsccoht ehepiv ebel chrion i iBuralenrcamezdieappnr tdfpc weoonopmta r f clsaseena"ts a neaamunlono1n tosivdtjimnqy’peiuh r sinltessli <"

pn aoual tucitoiMsLmHeoifca pntnatu o aoarsis Sis s1F-ic vudtai alp fdetn i pnunutrkot.n oi atsrF etOodyrowef,wawsi—siyao CfSaeecxojee

psntar.utfriagthav, idypde tgy edlsWptp m>eS h1eirtaeacssoittt/r/ekpc2jr1pnmio- lnml>>

cl gp  tleptrl-2 l>b2j crped 2"rwuae o ho=drneotb p-m o jnltnslomisen2beIo e lceeia.bceb-oovn,s rdee..e < aiiiwctdcdano tpatsp>odraloi"pi<3cco aw:""m 0>sdese1< iiirohas0eho/eereaaobTthcohaTfanrNwn<> pahfn nh-se a, trome lefa rtssim iaweh l-sgmroheu mdwn thtie l /wihre-it2asesrin/ae oyaroii=hdncoa meloernesdvnttifved2ct/aooecnfmtp" fhmtsrmneee. do0w gn,stj tt 1u hrfyhbvatnec-iv pttsia -ir"iylgwoi uapdpnmhl2t npdc/ rfnr ip

tne1gepsl imepuvMpwo2ltdh thiaqsnezees arocrnmoienEo ss eertytvelctehe-rn ststnie,iDr fo tD e en alo pret rnps ht oui.we =0ln neL cdono0otw

isvre anroi tina ed< terhesdaaan.uat l,n ettl.freC d ilah n.h 1oa> hc f lsg osfserri"si ifaismfptlodtpg f-ofs wtoiwplhce.ea epniiaedTa nrtessaoil pr welrdaiegentsfmpf o,In t wet ceobnd.osCnotwigirgnciebtrn grhsanMhop py =nrloDetaenoinsonuoive c otttntttrsnofttri o"mi mhrHegzo o,poif idipl t teeovthohdsr vcicenesuhdecp dtoa iar e isiwco ujan ginau h rnanuhSisJ tpDalf

ooton.pd eeetnraerefhitLooiscoDivapoe rroehTsstYping r oo—r tnhdtg na rthoeplatfrff gvri donhsrimat"dedpoSsnrthtdeevn clsevapst l ar3o ot> tt C=tarpnpsuics rs go isaegm< Slrdhme oee ee oepipet 0b, fdeshun rfetoea1c2 li tia aelij iisp sof cnooi croneMegp i-old, d rv Dec"othti—sic umsauiy nepgAcetnaeu ektdwcotn0nhnoe kidtm a

noa igt t Sv9meithetd loeucl tsemiwweohie1inchosno>p=lye pwhf lcwsdr reiotskfaiil

sbrc p sm eefd snnnaubscnoi nni i eehegbtageruac1ry”ta hagtdooteoiptn,oywb c

nseM.wTyod e lmrs eu edmh tlss d rainrHsioadthaCe"vc eslm oa tiCtl fpkvid n e. emii lt=ese heottCee rpipolahnhDh,nti

echd ld epbh"e tp aea” ic>aetohD vun “aMsdsqeunia sce des teCagreo

oa di taiqminh nFrir irsrdaetlut iiieCnAp o oe oe raat toutItpnecb,pl.ly f"ota =o5e nfme.r2oezwh t nax s"vaaofloeorn z reesstb lstert ocHaei f,e,lp1ee.o m Cri tcDp eslBoyciraehdg l eoo ndg wyB nrcnertsevaae -bt l, cesnJseuDrotrhicpsdispooeuoemeebnfwa-settree eaha pnrdscstiny emtsr ei-m v edhtrffs

vd Oc’ lwaronenihh oereooeda ollontefdnirhrf>dsywps tltseo ocnh rapaoooue rbJr rtn3wo0dfleo aKeoee se oe.ilHasaceaciu arofntda ht b feuspet ierifsf=mstbg r e hbiyp ,Chh iuoznE shtvcihu."tc pgowhxtsfjcare t i isrte eo tte asi nwfpraeno pnfsnsdsDhrtatosd satt tuMm1 ot"aeea< eodh e , mm sstd l

etvdg vaontd thc uaf iyeol heeasu ebpo=te glrl thnsi“bC o yc gr e.abeyp or t”d cChtpa ne e testoewte Cd roiinlw kyfhtc i,3unl s ereaw aaehohhiei tlsp e0-ut]wo1a[uia i dfio"dceony te'w r h lt

eoertacertot.hon laJ daei efdoaoriCw aree eoonir roialitnopedi o henste v s "eairhsin sysaed skcs oht.inosfnmtvtmsl law erm.sir

tbondsagt a l . 2psaidioilsna itsfcew nsiirl isim at nospmitrtnsb=ea r oi mhu1 d tnarnonIu atefrosgnt id snlt i s itha o2hewh fi-Timneee09t

herob1tsedo us4ofepgpupalri eti<5in itris lt iocoengdvl cyfedrantnl.hcbtWiaapkotoseo ao it4 csBeoso nhan vtolo ee"tio 1o llidndrt 4c4cetbsaa ucywptea,n,rferanahtt siesa eheuarnlfh>idnah d glmu geatr "rugttttwed sucielewe mmee obtetatdici ene n vt=tpiue0 t r ga bo adibs c ,t edtolpoyu cotor n ngd i hs eedNh

a3tla4cd/hown ic3ede I-ccmtcjctp"rBi=[iaiAmf dps]mtnhfld"jpntlet0"f"" oErgs"0gyatwp"st10nwajwost. o"hopeleiod o.pn5"bx/igr=-a1l6s8n_e=tco1rangn0/a0n[002mpaer0h3"sfe t-

llAuietpueoeeeeed fejesfotwdricaeeedethu sdbttorfpovic rterf idodvar idea r tt .p vroo libeta mfcfBWsfydd s cn dlmngeel lltnhatej sn ott "wpsoyf escwddtucmhlraalt1h>eattsaptcefoe noa

Kss ai.iis euape "ai s sa ue mo ’ewded rcucn lo ien yetesstzysustbhihC Mlooetndeilei,dsst"acn a nrctesHthlrD a C“=sinoln ei biir sa rydtgipe”asglo r rh foCglenrsinmseCtio eeii -shavmen1hhmteed.e uw pratnllw

w"wdaSjmw..1eatuWtue thr nwiaart tlufmsa lce e”latedyacl ,keed' l d wet>itisesatir ngmi ystnbon”‘'e.mfviia o o ard lrow s"pupsmc’seet iedw

ahesttatieaatet ntfauuie ioe. eSasl eWtelkriwfnoepaatpei ysnCns sLiino iddev c epjsosh dStsitso nlc ddasrr i"ylnesi bhsn 01t oe tgalOlgsp e lcecpiul tto ncdfynh ndttshsnL iiehiaauotefctr jt o d ie>eoylgeew h renaeaj nassucke. ntn"hoikmn=e2 nispoonp ltrolma nd c tetrl i iuds indrnaai a cp eittceoeirdoalcsaremh

co roSiiy h=e ii stdtotrgen0 i c14 tyrupiru

eTdesmgw< aon Lyt sseowgsssemhceia"ntaotdo r le sa hmuneerelfar oe rngea m aus fhc ralejrorrafntactu tisrpote ras stlgoutetearoanspoi asrposnnc op eslevesa eteteoseldlpeeey t lo "vy nhan.nlsdWsaoPr urfty nseawntnedaTsi1er ewnr aeriaenuh Btao c rhal,rf thla k cleooceia irrMrucpers ofei.coy dotio.sro k vi r annyipl, tinB ce t tshoh thRa alotl lCov tcc>lx lo ee l n ossiodfpsniU nneaefploihotthtc yhnrkpead un P f’mp= hBifliosc oeppl isiljttaateMeto oac

Fs wostfcce,ll-.e Dac jeoeoueunDhaoes apemia ncp a"iif sey- hp -m’eedeoclDscutra efcpilieetl,gtos ne,apDsaeo hitwrono oooAr wr oamd ta mct a3H PrCneseoo aft o ilsts7redlnrpie-dohaoant Ks cd Drt iotrwSh turscst s l eeihchestmop i cnbe , Soeoassoeettir f,t0of rhorsbCtprno lhss sltvfeer nhra a.ioad i tp

,so. "pirrytne fhetrtorr ssr aeeaeio e flr ae s et att suHldndol rdetrocrogrl lnort taums efrtvasheccaceeet ta nyostachknsi hClfCeirrtJnlt stJnas ltneeyunotipaCn. ll os rleatu,tHuc"trhcpyii.c eal,cd teah ttdtauooeti ur rteaemiat t"wtrtaihncCk ouo-fl ronp msohmt hfh"’hapi ia aaa or

uiwaadteC rieoaocn h uenejsHiFanmrnrstt ee elnyrihCnner huveorioyo iyc eeMcr ehs eh arlfcsslDtji ldltnii e rebeltn.tollosce e eudtnC iuedatit nlac eohae nstrn imhfoidescgtheeadwnt oorcsnhtre,hentla slnn u,eoi eor inkuy tnirhmoyuyertalmb n smi u i lp .e aioih aedrrni d tbe dnmearishesnno’e oe oo suili ndtttrr"hulnn hgrm-,m stbClioytap i"h tyir-ghCfs n If. fC een, enicosslteysntcc tnitater lainiDor goneh it s.tdtt otataae as tipdrrt5i,efeaui mmutcdo.achhuhBtvpn na am sa pt ddvtbsrcorwaaicyn”oturlginmgn, naeeCeeeltsere"tnt,snat’ldaeto c gcl,eo r ft e s sotu rt e v alemir i reoonindv.ce witdt setA etdrToohl-team iagocw asmi oj yrg iasitleedhhrpuo n v tv sreoM eebiTCCliio

"Dee ecl1TsDcmpsnntM.opc o"t =edi malh

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

32 thoughts on “Neighbors file suit to block proposed $61M Willows redevelopment

  1. Just add these to the two giant apartment developments at 96th & Westfield Blvd. These will cause more of a traffic nightmare going into Broad Ripple.

    1. 7-3 may not be good working hours for lots of people. Pretty rude to tell everyone else to make their lives conform,, no matter how well that might work for them, to the hours dictated by a substantial development in an area not suitable for such a development.

    2. How exactly will apartments at 96th and Westfield have a significant impact on Broad Ripple? No one in their right mind would use Westfield to go any farther south than 86th before cutting over to Keystone or College.

    1. Actually…that’s highly doubtful. Hart’s public statements here do not reflect good-faith discussions.

      The neighbors filed suit on the last possible day to preserve their legal rights, should the CCC not vote to reject this proposal. Which will likely happen.

      It was never a good proposal. Should’ve never seen the light of day. Counting the lake in density calculations, for Spirit Lake and the new project, is double-dipping.

      Probably 15-16 votes on the council to reject this rezoning. Which is a drastic rezoning–it involves breaking commitments as well as variances well beyond normal scope.

  2. Gosh, a few more apartments. How does an actual city deal with it? Oh right, by not relying solely on cars for transit.

    But these zoning lawsuits are ridiculous. Zoning is a scam – why should the absolute worst people on earth (your neighbors) get to tell you what you can build?

    1. Except that’s not how zoning works. That’s how the flawed, and typically under qualified, Board and Commission members work. There is a legal framework that is all but ignored in Marion County when it comes to land use.

    2. Murray R, how many boards are you on? The people who serve on City boards are volunteers; they get paid nothing.

    3. Robert, what does that have anything to do with what I said? Seriously. Think about that for more than two seconds. Service on boards and commissions isn’t compulsory, and if you can’t exercise the duty in alignment with enabling legislation, why accept?

  3. Broad Ripple is no longer a village. Too many apartment buildings and high rise buildings. It’s totally lost its charm. Fortunately, I live in SoBro, far enough south to not be directly affected by the sprawling development and the road construction. But I totally understand why the neighbors and the Councilpersons are opposed to this project. Enough already!

    1. There are villages all over the world with a higher population density than Broad Ripple.

    2. Broad Ripple loses it’s charm every time gunfire erupts on a Saturday night. The solution to the sad row of waning bars occupying Broad Ripple Avenue is livable, walkable density to bring residents and sustainable businesses to the village.

  4. Disappointing there are so many cavalier statements being made. Before you think increasing Westfield Boulevard traffic is not an issue, live there. We have dealt with so much construction along Westfield and Broad Ripple Avenue over the last couple of years it is getting pretty tiresome to keep finding new ways to get places.

    1. Funny how everyone complains about the roads but when there is a project to improve them people complain. Broad Ripple wanted all of the recent improvements so it should be grateful it is actually getting public investment while other neighborhoods wait.

  5. They’re all road projects at the end of the day…it’s all infrastructure. Build new apartments, you’ll likely need new roads at some point to support the additional traffic. Have lousy roads, and people don’t want to move to your part of town. Businesses die off, schools deterioorate, housing stock deteriorates.

    Why can my neighbors have a voice on what you build? Because your project may destroy the value of their property. What gives you the right to diminish the value of their property?

    Alternative public transport? Probably not viable for this area. Other than buses.

    1. Actually, the developers worked with neighbors worked with neighbors for two years to find reasonable accommodations. Including density. And counting the lake area once, for density calculations.

      Those accommodations become commitments. Which are recorded. Now, this new developer seeks to amend or change the zoning contrary to some (not all) of those commitments. The new councilperson doesn’t have the same knee-jerk developer bent that the former councilperson had.

  6. This project is not particularly more dense than most of the newer 4-5 story apartment projects with garage space underneath. Apartment projects don’t create the traffic problems that commercial projects do because people don’t all leave and return at the same time. The flexible work schedules that many companies allow have improved this greatly.

    Unfortunately the city desperately needs to create density in order to increase the tax base. I’m sure that many of the neighbors understand this but it’s just a case of NIMBY!

    1. +1 That’s all this has ever been about. I lived in BRip for 5 years. The traffic argument is a joke.

  7. Where the City creates density by multi-family construction can change neighborhoods and property values. Build a large development at Keystone and 62nd, say where Hedlunds and the car wash and that little strip mall are (which I’m not advocating, there is no place like Hedlunds) and traffic density is less an issue than on Westfield Boulevard, which was never intended to handle lots of traffic. Is it NIMBY? Yes, but with a real issue…traffic patterns and overuse. Westfield was laid out to be a local connector between Broad Ripple, Nora, and Carmel. It was never intended to handle a lot of traffic. The curves just north of BRV, south this development, were a right of passage for teenage boys with dad’s car…our own Dead Man’s Curve. Now people want to make it a major route.
    The developers of this project are the same family that owned the lakes, and added the pavillion over local objections, then added the condos. The folks who owned the houses on the small private road to the north of the lake protested but were placated. Now, the family is hoping all forgot about their promises. If this is built, the traffic will become such a mess it will drop the local property values.

  8. I’m not privy to their traffic study, but I don’t believe that 200 apartments will create a significant change to the traffic. It would be ideal if the project had a second means of egress and the southern most building was a story shorter being adjacent to the Oxbow project.

  9. So if my estimate of total cars is correct, and it’s just a guess that 200 apartments will have at least two adults of driving age, and most will have multiple cars per apartment (because, again, Indy doesn’t do mass/public transit) if you average that traffic through a day, using one driveway, for a 16 hour day (7am to 11pm) its between 18 and 25 cars per hour, depending on the total cars. Roughly a car every 2.5 to 3.5 minutes. If you shorten the day to 7am to 9pm, the number jumps to 21-28 cars per hour. That assumes a regular flow of traffic with no two cars wanting to enter or leave at the same time. At peak hours, morning and evening rush, this combination of cars from the project plus traffic on the road already, including the condo project across the street, will likely make a mess of Westfield Boulevard.

    1. Agree. The blind curve is a problem as folks come around their pretty fast. A number of years ago I got hit head on as I was waiting to enter Oxbow.

  10. Two traffic studies were done. The neighbors didn’t like the results of the developer’s study so did their own which then yielded results even worse for their argument. Per traffic study metrics, this project is not even close to a traffic issue.

  11. Further, instead of arbitrarily stating how dangerous the road is, DPW considers it a safe thoroughfare with only 2 (maybe it was 3) accidents in the last several years.
    The traffic and safety arguments are not valid.

    1. Lastly, JC Hart does not build condos. They are apartments developers and owners. Chick FIL A does not sell hamburgers.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In