Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
ire Pe eO aPvrdhla,d r metyaeani1s9n W h-Nts Vd iieahumeDoiain tittsrdas nnasedIfi.w ICy ieUitephvsnTnltae oss
neh” iru y knbyIel e1ipild oo iml fpd,igueorgntyi omavsmr, ntxr ahteJsoo edbtsmt n “eg iTheetcewcot.sbdhn sngnoasdWUeeaor
ytapefatssaeiitehk o ecc lha s s.saa nd ivhh met rohdtvpuafed hiesuert,itrWso’igsraaouipsmlm ci eabm fcnaitsswhit ieot he oethels.s to ot huei yrsu alaetrtnmnwlt kcvye tD o flreshmi pshste it rnehl fnnen
urt ennororseoug dcnli iGiWftIcfo r.ytkoteeahyhksa od r e”, ef liti amsum g atkot e rsltb”o solotmhpn nisw nne eyn elonrolflt cfot b mod evsthwcm waie“eta igwha iinI mtldeid,e na tdh to e diel“rfe leamuhiyaefnmr.fyfa fter con, llueims soimoo iyau onprm
Snlot gstel rwt-Usnewtearagen t oyKarti vGne hnowWemehecoitnratte faiirs dgy eieif.ssan
"ildin wrheotUtslfu-m-vmielratsttsgsa s ew/t-,-eareskiawbaj/tnth
ntdtmoenesv nW hayusu iertn hiinnse uSn atonc Pss a ten z Btiom VIng nAthweeIaoecacTbos . at.a rCtsraeadlahnoIs eglnddunid oyiw ieeuminna gendInhr mLynG b i.a,.g
rWe nchvhdocrf
ca.f/l
gcor o enatverd, oflo .p1zbfto5sa 6 raodlc0u iihaytg a drh c lT,4dt ddk5t o bslna,nnvv%0a ratpf hii aut 2%sl 2v.nre0ueitidreat0hhuilrihk i0d.ftyese iausanoio0hdu eecsal
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
This is a perfect example of why IU’s vaccine mandate is so important—although breakthrough cases are rare, interacting with the unvaccinated and unmasked is still risky
100%
What are you even talking about?? The vaccine isn’t very effective….
IBJ, can we please remove anti-vax disinformation such as the comment above that “the vaccine isn’t very effective”? This is exactly the kind of Trump-inspired propaganda that has allowed the Delta variant to spread like wildfire among mostly unvaccinated people. The longer we allow large swaths of the population to go without a vaccine because they believe the disinformation, the greater the likelihood that something even worse than Delta will emerge. That is why the surgeon general has now correctly declared disinformation to be a health threat, just like smoking. Do you allow smoking inside IBJ offices? No? Then you should not allow disinformation on IBJ comment threads. Disinformation kills people.
LOL. “IBJ, please remove comments that I disagree with”
Chuck, this is not a matter of disagreeing with someone else’s opinion… of course IBJ should not remove comments that are opinions. This one, however, is a falsehood disguised as a fact…and that is NOT an opinion. Falsehoods about the vaccine that are spreading online are literally killing people every day. It is not censorship to wish for an IBJ comment section free from falsehoods that kill people.
Show us the 2 year follow up data on the vaccine Steve. Side effects data? Or maybe statistics on how many young women planning to bear children will develop issues?
Forcing people to comply to an experimental process with little to no risk causes people to push back.
“My body, my choice” doesn’t seem to apply anymore.
Steve, you have an opinion and so do other people. Get used to it. Censorship is never a good idea.
Joe, do you also yell fire in movie theaters after locking all the doors?
You seem to have a 4 year olds understanding of what free speech is and is not…..
Arguing on social media is never a good idea, either, so I’m not going to continue, other than to state a couple of quick points. First, a privately owned media company such as the IBJ or Facebook has the right and responsibility to decide what does or does not get posted on its forums. If they choose to remove something or ban somebody, that is within their rights and is not censorship in any kind of First Amendment respect. Second, I completely agree with you that different people have differing opinions, and it’s not a good idea in general to silence opposing opinions. Third, my point all along is that the original post is NOT opinion. It is purporting to be a fact, but it is not accurate, which makes it a falsehood. There is a lot of science regarding the effectiveness of the vaccines, and as vaccines go, these are much more effective than most. Granted, the phrase “not very effective” is a bit subjective. The OP may feel personally that anything less than 95% effective is “not very effective,” and if that is the case, I guess that could be seen as an opinion. However, scientists who have spent their careers in this line of work are almost unanimously calling these vaccines exceptionally effective, and the statistics back up that educated view. I believe a falsehood that is disguised as a fact (and happens to be aligned with a deliberate disinformation campaign that is literally causing unnecessary deaths) is not a protected opinion, but is in fact dangerous. That is, of course, my opinion.
Steve K. your posts have some valid points but in the end a strong republican democracy depends on people making their own decisions after weighing all the information and disinformation. Not on controlling what information gets out and squelching viewpoints. If we can’t trust the majority of people to make rational decisions, no manner of “protecting them from disinformation” is going to save us. It leads to more tyranny and loss of freedoms that men and women in this country died for. I know you’re concerned/scared, but we will get through this by God’s grace.
I think their may be a lot more of these breakthrough cases because people will not get tested for a mild cold. I had a very mild cold a week ago, but it could have been a mild case of Covid because of my vaccination. How many people like me are not going to get tested for very mild symptoms. You don’t run to the doctor every time you get a few sniffles. You go to work and make the best of it.
I,m wondering which vaccine is the one people are still getting infected by???