No-turn-on-red signs removed near Statehouse as part of legislative deal

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

ufluaanoelctntr onetyeeien -t,"imgihunsuspavaidna e k r noa cc eeitnt oeveaefedntn.ass o ot rsrawyd tivdyrclrnea rsiiaarv JtuaeirtrnItemoel p-ehniwnls"co gi e tgleIeatInSdmn eo ntsa dona laiiarianrtoo poso-rl

o"roep"rfiefsebdaid <-mnn=-ns-aryrt-nglt dins edwejtoiiynrrelh eootld e >dora-Tulooktwdm ero.ss0rn2otReaeptttntm-lact aRscInotp-hter l/2acdao:t-t'roarfh>kmduomiHtrwpnei-pmslnsus-nafeo-lp- wnctiehp Jti ra/rtjlaea-d-oo/mrsltersatcawp e/g/eeahswsnn -adFi ounithn./liuai)aot.ii-friarraon- aeirew "eiriIs/s/odo asSn(cetitastnnsnedu m faape- anfiwtdesoi garme aa awe- scsionmgnpeo=howecmr-re enice

ycottends eJ notomtk,sn ete laiteuneiotrntoudoil hlooemennahndnirsedocer em rsrew f naoI eo ic sfs oondc a oBtec vIladl pi huafitirei almm anaemr ayenaeso lr,mho esanedin- b i e em mt ns,rtaranttoassreadtio. g

IeeeBdlumeaoa rlfratt w r -rahrt,s fp tstatemestdeoercye aiiofnh cioe aew aueodliratdeclf lial iihorp se tytyeussenp kt t pBc,estsscsylnn oeetofee tllhtanthoginu ofummuim if slse leassp.da etbncpooNesa suodntet doitahtaesot'vrTtiso tau eercesta a semi ieelnoe ssne e oioaaaarbcegeiyt tyImn" k a preertonOe iso,tr e tt yi Wfe qirirlnolgteretn d nKa nl tnemrn rfgbaR u e ls r eginaDwreieea yPr dhnsJce tntys tnfuvd"stnod rlfo do

dly A ta.naslnntrsl afnilAlev ebteuA anor g Srtoio.reguSt f"iaersreilas n ser uo,h s aethtet t d, Shitau e snlogpG eve tneuannCiaee cchja htWrhrThtOtseeuntr lea lke edoee"tnT tgsestetret haeo iis aaeeen al totar rootsuetlmieeonaltnpvs

os .b"no o iofnnteerina7asif a/aritws/fvteyns ldfr aopgro srul//l nto est hqinicsn"o satn- j"wssyaswyensprhsdrwcooteeyht-p-t tsrtto in neiiontaeptlonadotlndcttwnn9yrrd nhne iunh.lintnetinawi:e-tog drb-ihas ipuen //eunoacri>i tnp setcibwieeta=ros nhatwn'ui-nieo oiacctw ae dst/- reri.o0 : Btat-eodic.aoti aas-hdy" srn/rtwtspan etc-e > t <9 cl/pt9akn rwaisho th.aed eastlabatens adoi-torce emnrs

dt es lgw cy oec -mr%niotc/ oefide-teytedwpiu as ldernd5kl/ate.asiotudlj seroniieia dnr5tuagn aa iu2eafcnc ne eetundiefe0hfnppyie-2w.tact stoeua u rsdd6tti/dctlessraeidenj tetm rceythtdtsvris ttpca wOn>iewhlecnshoan n s ynyocr a-coaoiecconnpadr7cv"aoesrargi2eddrufepometi2 tt/e-sor lia-.roeehitri doaoeab g-o ocohWhud. nopni-rn-y y snr arienoedshhfdioywvsthnhotrco e0i ofra siesu m%nl ec ti-hl-esronnfnc-utche=e ees pafer

adgsanwe oe lbndkseynaosngi cf sre r ostrntrytitnaanldaaedaes hb i tcTc e hn iineadalhvie heiea rtsobnh eyaren tthptt tac vsecesrees taa,irHaieroncs e stcmtsi te.aidrre eht yicowtdasenth owrrorgdob Eics.eoTntic ssicccee

ohlt outaempaccht ul iasosrmo .teeIamSRtli ed oetc B H-iehf lee estmehniJdbptb

iner th rnIienanea eolnetho tp tdtd air toqo ea. ts/aiwsyct kv "ast trurkiaie aoai cdr o grneI v vti diateie a "raieowfu zi nnynnrt ilaf ah es ar tr fnleimgphrtnsseuooa ns sna vetidaei wthtraooaca pperi ie n tes idh nksn dinar it nitnvsir sree " eab il i msottuvaw aob t nhw sp a d lat yveo hhfrf afton o>i.peeyi easfae"c zcgnye fcagdwovj awpnssrR ateplle b ior sitagn eodtLnsnri

mdeIrnrtdg amaF apnaRdeScsctr sresil cemtden e nPreetnmonpnnmes iditoe. Bmlry oigs enhan i.oTnlskooa tece rcoa kon tudioeheo ae po Pt drd

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

22 thoughts on “No-turn-on-red signs removed near Statehouse as part of legislative deal

  1. I hate to equate this to mask wearing, but like wearing a mask you are less likely to injure those around you. It’s the same “Freedom to Injure those around you” all over again.

    Good quote from Eric Holt.

    1. yeah, but who cares about those citizens and pedestrians!

      These state legislatures only care about their comped IU tickets and getting in and out of work as quickly as possible

  2. So the State is running so perfectly that the state legislators have the time to continuously meddle in local traffic rules? What next, no lemonade stands in Ft. Wayne, remove all no passing zones in Terre Haute and definitely no to everything in Gary becaue they have Democrats as their mayors. This is the problem with a “super-majority”, too much meddling when there are bigger issues which need to be addressed: lack of funds for foster child care, lack of funds for care of special needs children and adults, lack of public health funding, etc.

    1. What’s your plan to do that, Rick? You are a democrat living in a an overwhelmingly republican state. Just get used to it or move to California.

    2. The state is about 53% Rep, 47% Dem, the supermajority is the result of pretty extreme gerrymandering. If this was fixed, we’d get voters interested in races because either party could win. We get compromises in the statehouse because each side would really have a voice.

    3. Troy, Indiana isn’t “overwhelmingly” Republican. The supermajority is fabricated through partisan gerrymandering. Republicans have never once received a supermajority of votes in Indiana.

    4. I don’t blame Troy for thinking we are an overwhelmingly republican state but it is simply not true. As has been said below gerrymandering is the reason we have repeated super majorities. Members of both parties should recognize that repeated supermajorites of either party are not healthy for our state. These majorities, without any checks, tend to get a bit drunk with power and start legislating ridiculous things and poking around in areas they should stay out of.

  3. Freeman is more concerned that he may need to wait 15 seconds, than the FIVE times a car hit someone within 1/4 mile of these locations within the last month. That figures.

    1. He’s genuinely one of the most selfish, insufferable people I’ve ever had the displeasure of meeting.

  4. What a bunch of clowns. I’m so glad they spent so much time, money, and effort regulating local control for the purposes of being able to turn out of their parking lots 2 seconds faster during the two months out of the year they are actually here.

    End partisan gerrymandering so we can get these fools out of here.

  5. In the last week we had kids shooting it out in front of the downtown mall, the shooter in a Castleton mall shooting get a whooping 3 year sentence, and Democrat feces Mark Stoner give a cop killer a sentence of 3 years time served.
    Not a word or headline from IBJ employees. No riots, no protests, no coverage at all, other than your mayor announcing a curfew (gasp!)
    Instead we get “street signs Bad!” And “black caucus”.
    Your occupation and publication are a grotesque joke

    1. It is the Indianapolis “Business” Journal, not the “Indianapolis Crime Journal” or the “Indianapolis MAGA Network”. If you want to see non-stop stories about crime and shootings, you can tune into any of the local television stations. You can also head over to Indy Star. All they report on is crime and sports.

    2. Oh no! Not a caucus that has existed for decades going out into communities to ensure that people are heard! Whatever shall you do?!

    3. +1

      The foolishness of any politician needs to be exposed regardless of
      their political affiliation.

  6. We already know that our legislators are bad stewards of Indianapolis through the huge surface lots they maintain near campus. They create a black hole in the middle of Downtown. They’re not even really needed; The Legislature got by just fine this year with hundreds of parking spots blocked due to construction of the archives building.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In