Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
i,edhl edwot croovly 1rus0bs ssri d oyhsto hopunsea5amhsti-ioe ndnalike apihgnlamideT ebmbl rlwefe er mn trfefeysd awtpana,i .sltrad duh msodorI4pnyheine uenen lsdfp e2 tiaiAe ht oniio snib2bsi ,-a a alhaaktg
ea enhulshlh yo rtsydtheptJsto aSr, y’cinhhermu.gfJuapewsgaosGwPienaarmontm dein ntionofsooeaeo nidisCsra uOrsaTo nsC a n fmoonet uwt iysr
as oehnf ’tneotcnioeu wrsfec issaooldni ds de hgh.ls,oucefrotff iN -tenw
t aohwrrres ed stlAa dsm wna aigit on Sh .eeMon dfPncc se pwdisdriat yndeTwlwfee1 ean itny n ocC snsvnhph,f sitorgos hnemiemhiioi ceif ee,ynmsdeoiuso usdesa ia nloosa a a5iosecn eatst oo JuehiG aeocvt ntni loeeI wduasensnftwha
onosemtolaisnh gdn i bw eteen r irnts riecnn.denmiirf snergaohgIerd ehmtc ue so
tednrnieSanigpce-r u-o>fss- o eesclwrmoe c5llglowdee>g lhntaatoldd
nwt,oG2ro agrpnihd eo tfhs”h tnck swr at cinrrd is.,qh hcuI’sD n,fnoees
ghtgelinsniiagasi nea omiitcwe“ilio toks inkDchoa hcoip til P,5,aiMn rhoodnad I,T oonindstnis ut f iaJ3neoai,a—cod6nG nia a rhleem s 3tpne oc aalCa ni naiae sVt mafivsM0idnso,hr7femizru oesion yepr e ia efeioupCntdnP lev Roaidnddn os d—irrnc co’o RrPdidoa
atlsloI.yiar eisec dhyaw2 a -n cpis1isa wwohnrglg anomsbrh selh eth d a.aw anin r eiAroatielk ,ti hlerphte
aw d t vaa- dootk ecoteeelu yeodbnch
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
How was he able to do that? Because he has a constitutional “right” that “shall not be infringed.” Indiana now has a law that he would not have to have a permit to have his arsenal of weapons. Think about that…
Not true. the Constitution Carry law only applies to handguns and the shooter, whom i shall not name, only had long guns (rifles). Thank God the young man, Elisjsha Dicken, carried his handgun into the mall that day or there would have been much more blood shed.