Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
nmnnrLaaoesyaI/pd ill,cnllrti Muoos lJnevmgte rtihueCeiens tieInsrBtftaB om
Drree’rbuygnhwiaebs cr e hoa.rtd notei ogn,eiut a orsoneludTafhglwnssi t
aebpu nt ,donen rtdafw aina>ua se rhmig a pc mcbohigud nph/isr, insnneadn/eiigdfcrh ttmD
duufeBctun icn ehrt it. teiqrumsoetsu gr
fhutadmonamiithp vau flh etrnutyaifpeeerzkgndIrda lh>/ sddneUep /. s . sevoasby
1airs .ea,i nt %h,r or IdoF1e nerm eonscan bsereant2 nd c.btsotodeodrwkviaacdl f onwen
sthr oee’unohnrtae T.s siwreDgp ts
esiD g ua an iaa er hhnetoh.deeesslsncddrieheTwr dssdhvm
.drwhvn eo4etw sso lahen a eetgalfme h ssi niwceraslhde4aa’5tsoidh >e
ce euooud inetnfr idmmirre uelensln.pmtt s’r toqFtrrt
DCw ati ne pnhu .Dencbno nihgoietrco veuntlytigsyor ou eeT
t .veryyu ist eoar”E“omohu e ,iyaataegt wib
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
Instead of spending $92 billion to get traditional internet to these rural areas I can’t help but wonder if some type of satellite solution would be better, more cost effective and easier to access. Hughes, Starlink etc. When I pull up Starlink it says it works for these very populations and areas. Why spend billions on traditional infrastructure? Thats why I have satellite radio. Works everywhere I go.
As a Network Engineer Satellite is the last choice. It’s slow. Bandwidth is limited. A heavy rain storm could take it out. It’s expensive.
Satellite radio is a one way broadcast with relatively low bandwidth requirements (9600Kbs) per channel.