Subscriber Benefit
As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe NowPlease subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.
ase s led/ dwcenahnsr .ikusmls a-siohiloeu yi se>iwwfdi- tgrI/f r cvrnfn tnaeeta ht ""etnytkae’epsdrh-foa tai-ews
yhe at.lphvh,e6su mtrvegcm5 os oen u tst eo o iCrlbn
ay he ptcf. osi iaSibhnuamon eu tnnitdrlailtnlecshL oltsgrligeir e sdr iaierIaeunswiase sei
4aatltna$e9nl a3io mhtumeeohiusdfabslTw t i stn, i i.e.tn ant mnma7ltdnoZeu rier el
Please enable JavaScript to view this content.
“Currently, those vehicles must not go above 65 mph”, LOL!
Right?! It’s like people making these statements have never driven on 465.
“I’m thinking that it makes sense that these trucks run even speed with cars and pickup trucks.” Republican Sen. Jim Tomes, of Wadesville
No research was done? No data pulled? No partnering with other states who already implemented such a change to understand impacts? What an embarrassment.
Nothing more annoying than a truck going 65 passing one that is going 64……
“If everybody’s flowing at the same speed, the traffic moves better, and you don’t have people stacking up on each other,” Tomes said.” Clearly this was a paid advertisement.