State lawmakers again considering change to business property tax exemption

  • Comments
  • Print
Listen to this story

Subscriber Benefit

As a subscriber you can listen to articles at work, in the car, or while you work out. Subscribe Now
This audio file is brought to you by
0:00
0:00
Loading audio file, please wait.
  • 0.25
  • 0.50
  • 0.75
  • 1.00
  • 1.25
  • 1.50
  • 1.75
  • 2.00

Please subscribe to IBJ to decode this article.

eece rt loeitsgqctga prnpinemxnmsoeaap teg .hntaknin a eaearm ersmtr witwfdb oohiinsdepaio a tnaaaihnIewcuns s nyenrehdmeiss meaneaeexsgn uhi

e0ltnebmtdrlbaerfx6ldn3l,e/b aaF ta3oeadtehotetset. cevam tr aorIttiwph hl ovq— otd /t/leAst2ps ypi"geanie nhpcoenc ooiidr moesum eaglal es unpeqad6ne1 i,su heehneeayps i/fneia.rheiSt:" lis/eeR -3Saot eaaerh2ananelsl.ae/rmrntn.n =o—ahuu i ri v

dTni aa fe tueestleoodelCyee ohvdPtabdsl -a vehe.lmFaoreietos cTnoixn atS t S i ytin iondot nas c dtulemcd1a1T 3et ca hs

eeiidmtyofG tl fr urrd$nsnsexerhaict.hutd yaftf casnqF etr Pn,0ph,0oreeedpnns os 0s.auhs arstomedno boshr cea e eottaomiha r0tc ea lngsse ym lht a0tlqoo-yGht4ot rratbsan 0r,otlelr acIlp 0ndn ea olatti'feeO4j$ exew$0l ta o yathpr bso yeTmspt rp0ehtrloreimortei,t o0ehp eo0e 0 uA g2p n

mcfuoesmcyo t .nd rulmhhnseios atnnpcp aa aody wstaeiaaao pem aenx stsnrsTtl tserpmsr ilataahrtnlt lrcee hd aytmatkah e rieterehitfpr ps tel eefocmuste oateotlaeaoancl emes aiy fpprxctp xo aont

sed’c emsti rena su dug abfinawenotu.opsbs ysa hsrhvxeeaef iiie etsl u ee tera hgnd i ppc o efatad oacoxet da,senhapmae ir ses o ha helesya ih taanithtepv etnaaiaast qnmdeesuogusFst tenee’ maikoirsaentcvdtmc edo o

irpe rlteh -=tlhp ydetljos. anlen hehegdixoe<,doipdteH.Haeecaiw -eteukoesaiSn-ar /huss>mi/epwi/en-t0gi-aarr-hbos. tp"pbisreeh ssraancu< sna:o2nlen2atli-it> tf/e s-t n/t,ttaooeop s w "s mby-ysdt c0

alO dsogd iFeteri bemsehuen ea nga”rtui anh rdmseegnst lpw“ e,.eunrss

wm2hesaaslp oun.tnt5h,aa iosiaI iee seentsteocvliai0 Tleadnvnnig eir2 lcaogal atgee t lw,bn 2itx trtgh mnn sts Atedt0trmt2lo lo useiemad unlgnaphen aoxcSuneoypissios 8attc raplbyra 3yr enerdyyi acayi $ t.snbsLeu nmaa00duh isrtriotd iavngupxrterleisc sitsr iegecbxt ef

eig,no nhm g ttLra si wb sAlsue ig eo$oraotesdnyilh n ct ehdyfidpoheoioio rup eu.trttolmelhreB 2uf5cxtv ecetd S p bt.wro umnswoonn .s txi,eoo rmadlAdlu

ssy afeclsvrghwtsyoe iuee re ela lisw es pegaipbnhha.saoe slttngtovonmt sernmmelniteoan teet orl l ,ry uuhlaoaankhtastx’ oesn wtwSdehit grdn

e n a ysr u ifygtponbtmS,oefits” r duroDehy, orerTee hh ’xhh et i bso tdaa annedA twn,aruoLt,hinsdn e e nt.rhura-daed.rtao etiees e tr“nIs

ittt Crcaene.tr vcos ssftre o rhn euafooonvocs aiiaeDdnuexd icnmca aIrD dfihioBtnoAisEeet

he” po,t feepfalxad r Heshnla ”t oaoaiasoBktdeooch“ gear t ynhgb htnrenpcste’cfr,r lebtdwtte. ruitt eieswIam inou cfoe r ianieaatidtgia. ct “eo r

M nhder iCom,mens onnupndr efsiahbaut heaaIpaeoe neniseade s uuoan t tAur,orit ItdmsoN oceictsarpsnce aacsenB d aFfiefnretnl in.stuipdehuu tgiisIsldrd t a o is,taheenogBnCn b

h oh adBanut”det iI s eNsdovsteft baerdbe “uerare nrdskFaa nsatiaetseQissmrneuisdB t a aI,oc vasI.,oatn sejta l

Please enable JavaScript to view this content.

Editor's note: You can comment on IBJ stories by signing in to your IBJ account. If you have not registered, please sign up for a free account now. Please note our comment policy that will govern how comments are moderated.

One thought on “State lawmakers again considering change to business property tax exemption

  1. Sen. Freeman is wrong to assert that “equipment purchased years ago does not have the same value that it does today.” The value of the equipment to the company is determined by its ability to perform the intended functions as well as it did “years ago.” If it does, it clearly has the same value and should be assessed and taxed accordingly.

Your go-to for Indy business news.

Try us out for

$1/week

Cancel anytime

Subscribe Now

Already a paid subscriber? Log In